Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Proposing two new metaheuristic algorithms of ALO-MLP and SHO-MLP in predicting bearing capacity of circular footing located on horizontal multilayer soil

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, for the issue of shallow circular footing’s bearing capacity (also shown as Fult), we used the merits of artificial neural network (ANN), while optimized it by two metaheuristic algorithms (i.e., ant lion optimization (ALO) and the spotted hyena optimizer (SHO)). Several studies demonstrated that ANNs have significant results in terms of predicting the soil’s bearing capacity. Nevertheless, most models of ANN learning consist of different disadvantages. Accordantly, we focused on the application of two hybrid models of ALO–MLP and SHO–MLP for predicting the Fult placed in layered soils. Moreover, we performed an Extensive Finite Element (FE) modeling on 16 sets of soil layer (soft soil placed onto stronger soil and vice versa) considering a database that consists of 703 testing and 2810 training datasets for preparing the training and testing datasets. The independent variables in terms of ALO and SHO algorithms have been optimized by taking into account a trial and error process. The input data layers consisted of (i) upper layer foundation/thickness width (h/B) ratio, (ii) bottom and topsoil layer properties (for example, six of the most important properties of soil), (iii) vertical settlement (s), (iv) footing width (B), where the main target was taken Fult. According to RMSE and R2, values of (0.996 and 0.034) and (0.994 and 0.044) are obtained for training dataset and values of (0.994 and 0.040) and (0.991 and 0.050) are found for the testing dataset of proposed SHO–MLP and ALO–MLP best-fit prediction network structures, respectively. This proves higher reliability of the proposed hybrid model of SHO–MLP in approximating shallow circular footing bearing capacity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Asadi A, Moayedi H, Huat BB, Parsaie A, Taha MR (2011) Artificial neural networks approach for electrochemical resistivity of highly organic soil. Int J Electrochem Sci 6:1135–1145

    Google Scholar 

  2. Muthusamy S, Manickam LP, Murugesan V, Muthukumaran C, Pugazhendhi A (2019) Pectin extraction from Helianthus annuus (sunflower) heads using RSM and ANN modelling by a genetic algorithm approach. Int J Biol Macromol 124:750–758

    Google Scholar 

  3. Meyerhof GG, Hanna AM (1978) Ultimate bearing capacity of foundations on layered soils under inclined load. Can Geotech J 15:565–572

    Google Scholar 

  4. Latifi N, Marto A, Eisazadeh A (2016) Experimental investigations on behaviour of strip footing placed on chemically stabilised backfills and flexible retaining walls. Arab J Sci Eng 41:4115–4126

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chakraborty A, Goswami D (2017) Prediction of slope stability using multiple linear regression (MLR) and artificial neural network (ANN). Arab J Geosci 10:11

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bowles LE (1996) Foundation analysis and design. McGraw-hill, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  7. Moayedi H, Mosallanezhad M, Nazir R (2017) Evaluation of maintained load test (MLT) and pile driving analyzer (PDA) in measuring bearing capacity of driven reinforced concrete piles. Soil Mech Found Eng 54:150–154

    Google Scholar 

  8. Moayedi H, Armaghani DJ (2018) Optimizing an ANN model with ICA for estimating bearing capacity of driven pile in cohesionless soil. Eng Comput 34:347–356

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moayedi H, Nazir R, Ghareh S, Sobhanmanesh A, Tan YC (2018) Performance analysis of a piled raft foundation system of varying pile lengths in controlling angular distortion. Soil Mech Found Eng 55:265–269

    Google Scholar 

  10. Momeni E, Armaghani DJ, Fatemi SA, Nazir R (2018) Prediction of bearing capacity of thin-walled foundation: a simulation approach. Eng Comput 34:319–327

    Google Scholar 

  11. Das BM (2008) Principles of Foundation Engineering, 8th edn. McGraw-Hill Book Co., Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moayedi H, Hayati S (2018) Modelling and optimization of ultimate bearing capacity of strip footing near a slope by soft computing methods. Appl Soft Comput 66:208–219

    Google Scholar 

  13. Gao W, Karbasi M, Derakhsh AM, Jalili A (2019) Development of a novel soft-computing framework for the simulation aims: a case study. Eng Comput 35:315–322

    Google Scholar 

  14. Latifi N, Vahedifard F, Ghazanfari E, Horpibulsuk S, Marto A, Williams J (2017) Sustainable improvement of clays using low-carbon nontraditional additive. Int J Geomech 18:04017162

    Google Scholar 

  15. Uncuoglu E (2015) The bearing capacity of square footings on a sand layer overlying clay. Geomech Eng 9:287–311

    Google Scholar 

  16. Dhiman G, Kumar V (2018) Multi-objective spotted hyena optimizer: a Multi-objective optimization algorithm for engineering problems. Knowl-Based Syst 150:175–197

    Google Scholar 

  17. McCulloch W, Pitts W (1943) A logical calculus of the ideas immanent in nervous activity. Bull Math Biophys 5:115–133

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Hebb D (1949) The organization of behavior: a neurophysiological approach. Wiley, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  19. Pham BT, Prakash I, Bui DT (2018) Spatial prediction of landslides using a hybrid machine learning approach based on random subspace and classification and regression trees. Geomorphology 303:256–270

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gao W, Wu H, Siddiqui MK, Baig AQ (2018) Study of biological networks using graph theory. Saudi J Biol Sci 25:1212–1219

    Google Scholar 

  21. Tien BT, nhu NH, Hong ND (2018) Prediction of soil compression coefficient for urban housing project using novel integration machine learning approach of swarm intelligence and Multi-layer Perceptron Neural Network. Adv Eng Inform 38:593–604

    Google Scholar 

  22. Gao W, Guirao JLG, Basavanagoud B, Wu J (2018) Partial multi-dividing ontology learning algorithm. Inf Sci 467:35–58

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Gao W, Dimitrov D, Abdo H (2018) Tight independent set neighborhood union condition for fractional critical deleted graphs and ID deleted graphs. Discret Contin Dyn Syst 12:711–721

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Gao W, Guirao JLG, Abdel-Aty M, Xi W (2019) An independent set degree condition for fractional critical deleted graphs. Discret Contin Dyn Syst 12:877–886

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Gao W, Wang W, Dimitrov D, Wang Y (2018) Nano properties analysis via fourth multiplicative ABC indicator calculating. Arab J Chem 11:793–801

    Google Scholar 

  26. Nguyen H, Bui X-N (2018) Predicting blast-induced air overpressure: A robust artificial intelligence system based on artificial neural networks and random forest. Nat Resour Res 28:893–907

    Google Scholar 

  27. Gao W, Karbasi M, Hasanipanah M, Zhang X, Guo J (2018) Developing GPR model for forecasting the rock fragmentation in surface mines. Eng Comput 34:339–345

    Google Scholar 

  28. Mirjalili S (2015) The ant lion optimizer. Adv Eng Softw 83:80–98

    Google Scholar 

  29. Kose U (2018) An ant-lion optimizer-trained artificial neural network system for chaotic electroencephalogram (EEG) prediction. Appl Sci 8:1613

    Google Scholar 

  30. Mirjalili S, Jangir P, Saremi S (2017) Multi-objective ant lion optimizer: a multi-objective optimization algorithm for solving engineering problems. Appl Intell 46:79–95

    Google Scholar 

  31. Luo Q, Li J, Zhou Y (2019) Spotted hyena optimizer with lateral inhibition for image matching. Multimed Tools Appl 78:34277–34296

    Google Scholar 

  32. Jia H, Li J, Song W, Peng X, Lang C, Li Y (2019) Spotted hyena optimization algorithm with simulated annealing for feature selection. IEEE Access 7:71943–71962

    Google Scholar 

  33. Kaur A, Kaur S, Dhiman G (2018) A quantum method for dynamic nonlinear programming technique using Schrödinger equation and Monte Carlo approach. Mod Phys Lett B 32:1850374

    Google Scholar 

  34. Fan JY, Jiang DY, Liu W, Wu F, Chen J, Daemen JJK (2019) Discontinuous fatigue of salt rock with low-stress intervals. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 115(3):77–86

    Google Scholar 

  35. Chen J, Lu D, Liu W, Fan JY, Jiang DY, Yi L et al (2019) Stability study and optimization design of small-spacing two-well (SSTW) salt caverns for natural gas storages. J Energy Storage. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2019.101131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang Z, Jiang D, Liu W, Chen J, Li E, Fan J et al (2019) Study on the mechanism of roof collapse and leakage of horizontal cavern in thinly bedded salt rocks. Environ Earth Sci 78(10):292

    Google Scholar 

  37. Qiao W, Huang K, Azimi M, Han S (2019) A novel hybrid prediction model for hourly gas consumption in supply side based on improved whale optimization algorithm and relevance vector machine. IEEE Access 7:88218–88230

    Google Scholar 

  38. Mosallanezhad M, Moayedi H (2017) Comparison Analysis of Bearing Capacity Approaches for the Strip Footing on Layered Soils. Arab J Sci Eng 42:3711–3722

    Google Scholar 

  39. Hou J, Zhang MX, Dai ZH, Li JZ, Zeng FF (2017) Bearing capacity of strip foundations in horizontal-vertical reinforced soils. Geotext Geomembr 45:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  40. Anvari SM, Shooshpasha I (2016) Influence of size of granulated rubber on bearing capacity of fine-grained sand. Arab J Geosci 9:12

    Google Scholar 

  41. Noorzad R, Manavirad E (2014) Bearing capacity of two close strip footings on soft clay reinforced with geotextile. Arab J Geosci 7:623–639

    Google Scholar 

  42. Vundavilli PR, Pratihar DK (2009) Soft computing-based gait planners for a dynamically balanced biped robot negotiating sloping surfaces. Appl Soft Comput 9:191–208

    Google Scholar 

  43. dos Santos CM, Escobedo JF, Teramoto ÉT, da Silva SHMG (2016) Assessment of ANN and SVM models for estimating normal direct irradiation (Hb). Energy Convers Manag 126:826–836

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Financial support from the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No.FRF-TP-18-015A3) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hossein Moayedi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Corresponding author at: Ton Duc Thang University, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, W., Moayedi, H., Nguyen, H. et al. Proposing two new metaheuristic algorithms of ALO-MLP and SHO-MLP in predicting bearing capacity of circular footing located on horizontal multilayer soil. Engineering with Computers 37, 1537–1547 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00897-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-019-00897-9

Keywords

Navigation