Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Multi-colour FISH on preoperative renal tumour biopsies to confirm the diagnosis of uncertain renal masses

  • Topic Paper
  • Published:
World Journal of Urology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

In some cases with uncertain renal tumour lesions, it would be helpful to perform biopsies for the preoperative differential diagnosis. In our study, we evaluated the benefit of multi-colour interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (M-FISH) on fine-needle core biopsies in uncertain renal masses.

Methods

We prospectively performed three ultrasound-guided percutaneous biopsies in 25 patients with indeterminate renal masses preoperatively. Histopathology was performed on two remaining cores samples. M-FISH was performed on one core for chromosomes 1, 2, 6, 9, 7, 17, the loci 3p24pter, and 3p13p14. After interphase FISH evaluation, we classified tumours and compared the results with histopathological findings.

Results

16 were classified as renal malignancies: 14 (56%) clear cell renal cell carcinomas (RCCs), 1 papillary RCCs (4%), and 1 “adenocarcinoma” (4%). Seven patients (28%) had a benign tumour, i.e. 6 (24%) were oncocytomas and 1 was classified as leiomyoma (4%). In two cases (8%), no renal neoplasms were found. In 19 out of 21 cases (90.5%), the preoperative diagnostic fine-needle biopsy matched the final histological findings. The combination of histopathological examination and M-FISH leads to a higher (95.5 vs. 90.5%) diagnostic fidelity as histology alone.

Conclusions

Ultrasound-guided percutaneous renal tumour biopsy is an accurate and safety method for the histopathologic evaluation of uncertain renal masses. The M-FISH represents a new highly sensitive and specific method to confirm histopathological classification in less than 24 h which can be used in routine laboratory diagnosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Receveur AO, Couturier J, Molinie V, Vieillefond A, Desangles F, Guillaud-Bataille M, Danglot G, Coullin P, Bernheim A (2005) Characterization of quantitative chromosomal abnormalities in renal cell carcinomas by interphase four-color fluorescence in situ hybridization. Cancer Genet Cytogenet 158:110–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Richter F, Kasabian NG, Irwin RJ Jr, Watson RA, Lang EK (2000) Accuracy of diagnosis by guided biopsy of renal mass lesions classified indeterminate by imaging studies. Urology 55:348–352

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Shannon BA, Cohen RJ, de Bruto H, Davies RJ (2008) The value of preoperative needle core biopsy for diagnosing benign lesions among small, incidentally detected renal masses. J Urol 180:1257–1261 (discussion 1261)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Amin MB, Corless CL, Renshaw AA, Tickoo SK, Kubus J, Schultz DS (1997) Papillary (chromophil) renal cell carcinoma. Histomorphologic characteristics and evaluation of conventional pathologic prognostic parameters in 62 cases. Am J Surg Pathol 21:621–635

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Zincke H, Weaver AL, Blute ML (2003) Comparisons of outcome and prognostic features among histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 27:612–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sanjmyatav J, Rubtsov N, Starke H, Schubert J, Hindermann W, Junker K (2005) Identification of tumor entities of renal cell carcinoma using interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization. J Urol 174:731–735

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Lopez-Beltran A, Scarpelli M, Montironi R, Kirkali Z (2006) 2004 WHO classification of the renal tumors of the adults. Eur Urol 49:798–805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Junker K, Weirich G, Amin MB, Moravek P, Hindermann W, Schubert J (2003) Genetic subtyping of renal cell carcinoma by comparative genomic hybridization. Recent Results Cancer Res 162:169–175

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Reichelt O, Gajda M, Chyhrai A, Wunderlich H, Junker K, Schubert J (2007) Ultrasound-guided biopsy of homogenous solid renal masses. Eur Urol 52:1421–1426

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Remzi M, Katzenbeisser D, Waldert M, Klingler HC, Susani M, Memarsadeghi M, Heinz-Peer G, Haitel A, Herwig R, Marberger M (2007) Renal tumour size measured radiologically before surgery is an unreliable variable for predicting histopathological features: benign tumours are not necessarily small. BJU Int 99:1002–1006

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Frank I, Blute ML, Cheville JC, Lohse CM, Weaver AL, Zincke H (2003) Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size. J Urol 170:2217–2220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Volpe A, Terrone C, Scarpa RM (2009) The current role of percutaneous needle biopsies of renal tumours. Arch Ital Urol Androl 81:107–112

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kunkle DA, Egleston BL, Uzzo RG (2008) Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma—a meta-analysis and review. J Urol 179:1227–1233 (discussion 1233–1224)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Wunderlich H, Hindermann W, Al Mustafa AM, Reichelt O, Junker K, Schubert J (2005) The accuracy of 250 fine needle biopsies of renal tumors. J Urol 174:44–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Herts BR, Baker ME (1995) The current role of percutaneous biopsy in the evaluation of renal masses. Semin Urol Oncol 13:254–261

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Neuzillet Y, Lechevallier E, Andre M, Daniel L, Coulange C (2004) Accuracy and clinical role of fine needle percutaneous biopsy with computerized tomography guidance of small (less than 4.0 cm) renal masses. J Urol 171:1802–1805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lechevallier E, Andre M, Barriol D, Daniel L, Eghazarian C, De Fromont M, Rossi D, Coulange C (2000) Fine-needle percutaneous biopsy of renal masses with helical ct guidance. Radiology 216:506–510

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Remzi M, Marberger M (2009) Renal tumor biopsies for evaluation of small renal tumors: why, in whom, and how? Eur Urol 55:359–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Wood BJ, Khan MA, McGovern F, Harisinghani M, Hahn PF, Mueller PR (1999) Imaging guided biopsy of renal masses. Indications, accuracy and impact on clinical management. J Urol 161:1470–1474

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barriol D, Lechevallier E, Andre M, Daniel L, Ortega JC, Rossi D, Coulange C (2000) CT-guided percutaneous fine needle biopsy of solid tumors of the kidney. Prog Urol 10:1145–1151

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Eshed I, Elias S, Sidi AA (2004) Diagnostic value of CT-guided biopsy of indeterminate renal masses. Clin Radiol 59:262–267

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Storkel S (1999) Epithelial tumors of the kidney. Pathological subtyping and cytogenetic correlation. Urologe A 38:425–432

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Barocas DA, Rohan SM, Kao J, Gurevich RD, Del Pizzo JJ, Vaughan ED Jr, Akhtar M, Chen YT, Scherr DS (2006) Diagnosis of renal tumors on needle biopsy specimens by histological and molecular analysis. J Urol 176:1957–1962

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Kovacs G, Akhtar M, Beckwith BJ, Bugert P, Cooper CS, Delahunt B, Eble JN, Fleming S, Ljungberg B, Medeiros LJ, Moch H, Reuter VE, Ritz E, Roos G, Schmidt D, Srigley JR, Storkel S, van den Berg E, Zbar B (1997) The Heidelberg classification of renal cell tumours. J Pathol 183:131–133

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Grady B, Goharderakhshan R, Chang J, Ribeiro-Filho LA, Perinchery G, Franks J, Presti J, Carroll P, Dahiya R (2001) Frequently deleted loci on chromosome 9 may harbor several tumor suppressor genes in human renal cell carcinoma. J Urol 166:1088–1092

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Herbers J, Schullerus D, Muller H, Kenck C, Chudek J, Weimer J, Bugert P, Kovacs G (1997) Significance of chromosome arm 14q loss in nonpapillary renal cell carcinomas. Genes Chromosom Cancer 19:29–35

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Renshaw AA, Lee KR, Madge R, Granter SR (1997) Accuracy of fine needle aspiration in distinguishing subtypes of renal cell carcinoma. Acta Cytol 41:987–994

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Glukhova L, Goguel AF, Chudoba I, Angevin E, Pavon C, Terrier-Lacombe MJ, Meddeb M, Escudier B, Bernheim A (1998) Overrepresentation of 7q31 and 17q in renal cell carcinomas. Genes Chromosom Cancer 22:171–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Kovacs G (1999) Renal oncocytoma—cytogenetic study? Orv Hetil 140:2325

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Nagy A, Buzogany I, Kovacs G (2004) Microsatellite allelotyping differentiates chromophobe renal cell carcinomas from renal oncocytomas and identifies new genetic changes. Histopathology 44:542–546

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Iqbal MA, Akhtar M, Ulmer C, Al-Dayel F, Paterson MC (2000) Fish analysis in chromophobe renal-cell carcinoma. Diagn Cytopathol 22:3–6

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest statement

There is no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Urology, University Hospitals, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Lessingstrasse 1, 07743, Jena, Germany

    Aliaksei Chyhrai, Jimsgene Sanjmyatav, Heiko Wunderlich, Thomas Steiner, Enis Tanović & Kerstin Junker

  2. Department of Pathology, University Hospitals, Friedrich-Schiller University Jena, Jena, Germany

    Mieczyslaw Gajda

  3. Department of Urology, Martin-Luther-University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany

    Olaf Reichelt

Authors
  1. Aliaksei Chyhrai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jimsgene Sanjmyatav
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mieczyslaw Gajda
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Olaf Reichelt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Heiko Wunderlich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Thomas Steiner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Enis Tanović
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Kerstin Junker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aliaksei Chyhrai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chyhrai, A., Sanjmyatav, J., Gajda, M. et al. Multi-colour FISH on preoperative renal tumour biopsies to confirm the diagnosis of uncertain renal masses. World J Urol 28, 269–274 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0551-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00345-010-0551-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation