Abstract
Low stiffness and special stiffness properties limit the application of industrial robots in sophisticated manufacturing. The subject of the paper is to investigate the influence of robot stiffness properties on machining quality in drilling application. It is found that unidirectional thrust force could induce three-directional deformation of robot which will directly lead to hole defects during drilling procedure. Firstly, starting from the special characteristics of the robot, the key role of the preload pressing force is pointed out. Equivalent stiffness model under pre-load pressing force is established and stiffness promotion coefficient is defined to evaluate the effects of pressing force quantitatively. The matching criterion of robot drilling posture and thrust force is proposed, and the optimized value of pressing force can be predicted under the condition of stable machining. Limitation on hole diameter and roundness of robot drilling is evaluated too. By applying pre-load pressing force, the stiffness of robot drilling plane is markedly improved, and the drilling stability and hole diameter accuracy are also enhanced. Finally, the proposed method is verified by drilling experiments.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Schneider U, Drust M, Ansaloni M, Lehmann C, Pellicciari M, Leali F, Gunnink JW, Verl A (2016) Improving robotic machining accuracy through experimental error investigation and modular compensation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 85(1–4):3–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6021-2
Chen YH, Dong FH (2013) Robot machining: recent development and future research issues. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 66(9–12):1489–1497. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4433-4
International Federation of Robotics, Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Robotics and Automation Society (2013) 2013 44th international symposium on robotics (ISR 2013) Seoul, South Korea, 24–26 October 2013. IEEE, Piscataway
Wang GF, Dong HY, Guo YJ, Ke YL (2016) Dynamic cutting force modeling and experimental study of industrial robotic boring. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 86(1–4):179–190. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-8166-z
Choi J, Min S, Dornfeld D A, Alam M, Tzong T (2003) Modeling of inter-layer gap formation in Drilling of a Multi-Layered Material. In: Proc. 6th CIRP workshop on modeling of machining, McMaster University, Hamilton, pp.36-41
Slavkovic NR, Milutinovic DS, Glavonjic MM (2014) A method for off-line compensation of cutting force-induced errors in robotic machining by tool path modification. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70(9–12):2083–2096. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5421-z
Pan ZX, Zhang H, Zhu ZQ, Wang JJ (2006) Chatter analysis of robotic machining process. J Mater Process Technol 173(3):301–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2005.11.033
Cordes M, Hintze W (2017) Offline simulation of path deviation due to joint compliance and hysteresis for robot machining. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90(1–4):1075–1083. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9461-z
Zhang H, Wang JJ, Zhang G, Gan ZX, Pan ZX, Cui HL, Zhu ZQ (2005) Machining with flexible manipulator: toward improving robotic machining performance. Ieee Asme Int C Adv:1127–1132. https://doi.org/10.1109/Aim.2005.1511161
Abele E, Schützer K, Bauer J et al (2012) Tool path adaption based on optical measurement data for milling with industrial robots. Prod Eng Res Dev 6(4–5):459–465. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-012-0383-9
Abele E, Weigold M, Rothenbucher S (2007) Modeling and identification of an industrial robot for machining applications. Cirp Ann Manuf Technol 56(1):387–390. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.090
Vosniakos GC, Matsas E (2010) Improving feasibility of robotic milling through robot placement optimisation. Robot Cim-Int Manuf 26(5):517–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2010.04.001
Zaeh MF, Roesch O (2014) Improvement of the machining accuracy of milling robots. Prod Eng 8(6):737–744. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-014-0558-7
Furtado LFF, Villani E, Trabasso LG, Suterio R (2017) A method to improve the use of 6-dof robots as machine tools. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 92(5–8):2487–2502. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-017-0336-8
DeVlieg R, Sitton K, Feikert E, Inman J (2002) ONCE (one sided cell end effector) robotic drilling system. SAE 2002 Automated Fastening Conference & Exposion, Chester, ENGLA. SAE technical papers 2002-01-2626. https://doi.org/10.4271/2002-01-2626
Hempstead B, DeVlieg R, Mistry R, Sheridan M (2001) Drill and drive end effector. SAE 2001 Automated Fastening Conference & Exposition, Seattle, WA, USA. SAE technical papers 2001-01-2576. https://doi.org/10.4271/2001-01-2576
Devlieg R (2011) High-accuracy robotic drilling/milling of 737 inboard flaps. SAE Int J of Aerosp 4(2):1373–1379. https://doi.org/10.4271/2011-01-2733
Melkote SN, Newton TR, Hellstern C, Morehouse JB, Turner S (2010) Interfacial Burr Formation in Drilling of Stacked Aerospace Materials. Burrs - Analysis, Control and Removal: 89−+, Springer-Verlag, Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-00568-8_10
Jie L (2013) The formation and effect of interlayer gap in dry drilling of stacked metal materials. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5–8):1263–1272. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5112-9
Gao YH, Wu D, Nan CG, Ma XU, Dong YF, Chen K (2015) The interlayer gap and non-coaxiality in stack drilling. Int J Mach Tool Manu 99:68–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.09.007
Guo YJ, Dong HY, Wang GF, Ke YL (2016) Vibration analysis and suppression in robotic boring process. Int J Mach Tool Manu 101:102–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2015.11.011
Dumas C, Caro S, Garnier S, Furet B (2011) Joint stiffness identification of six-revolute industrial serial robots. Robot Cim-Int Manuf 27(4):881–888. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2011.02.003
Chen S, Kao I (2000) Conservative congruence transformation for joint and Cartesian stiffness matrices of robot hands and fingers. Int J Robot Res 19(9):835–847. https://doi.org/10.1002/rob.20047
Bu Y, Liao WH, Tian W, Zhang J, Zhang L (2017) Stiffness analysis and optimization in robotic drilling application. Precis Eng 49:388–400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2017.04.001
Olsson T, Haage M, Kihlman H, Johansson R, Nilsson K, Robertsson A, Bjorkman M, Isaksson R, Ossbahr G, Brogardh T (2010) Cost-efficient drilling using industrial robots with high-bandwidth force feedback. Robot Cim-Int Manuf 26(1):24–38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2009.01.002
Thomson WT, Dahleh MD (1998) Theory of vibration with applications, 5th edn. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River
Lauderbaugh LK (2009) Analysis of the effects of process parameters on exit burrs in drilling using a combined simulation and experimental approach. J Mater Process Technol 209(4):1909–1919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2008.04.062
Chang SSF, Bone GM (2010) Burr height model for vibration assisted drilling of aluminum 6061-T6. Precis Eng 34(3):369–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.precisioneng.2009.09.002
Garnier S, Subrin K, Waiyagan K (2017) Modelling of robotic drilling. Procedia CIRP 58:416–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2017.03.246
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by “the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NO.51575273)”, “Funding of Jiangsu Innovation Program for Graduate Education (NO.KYLX15_0294)”, “the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities” and “the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (No. NP2018303)”
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, J., Liao, W., Bu, Y. et al. Stiffness properties analysis and enhancement in robotic drilling application. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 106, 5539–5558 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05011-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-020-05011-8