Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content

Advertisement

Springer Nature Link
Log in

Using artificial neural networks for the prediction of dimensional error on inclined surfaces manufactured by ball-end milling

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Industrial demand for models and simulation tools that can predict dimensional errors in manufacturing processes is vigorous. One example of these processes is ball-end finishing of inclined surfaces, which is a very complex task, due to the high number of variables that may influence dimensional errors during a cutting process and their different nature. This work firstly analyses the potential of semiempirical models to address the ball-end milling finishing, to conclude that these models are unable to process and to replicate the full range of milling strategies and slope combinations. Secondly, it goes on to analyse the possibilities of artificial neural networks as a means of overcoming this limitation. Two types of neural networks, multilayer perceptron (MLP) and radial basis functions (RBF), are tested. The results show that RBFs predict better than MLPs in all cases, achieving a precision of 1.83 μm in root mean squared error (RMSE) and a correlation coefficient of 0.897 with a 10 × 10 cross-validation scheme. Their training and tuning times are also 2.5 times shorter in all cases. Finally, the use of 3D figures, generated from the best RBF model, yields interesting industrial results in the field of process engineering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.

References

  1. Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2003) Predicting surface roughness in machining: a review. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(8):833–844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandrasekaran M, Muralidhar M, Krishna C, Dixit U (2010) Application of soft computing techniques in machining performance prediction and optimization: a literature review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(5):445–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Correa M, Bielza C, Ramirez MDJ, Alique JR (2008) A Bayesian network model for surface roughness prediction in the machining process. Int J Syst Sci 39(12):1181–1192

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Martellotti ME (1941) An analysis of the milling process. Trans ASME 63:667

    Google Scholar 

  5. Quintana G, Ribatallada J, Ciurana Q (2010) Surface roughness generation and material removal rate in ball-end milling operations. Mater Manuf Process 25(6):386–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Arizmendi M, Fernández J, Gil A, Veiga F (2009) Effect of tool setting error on the topography of surfaces machined by peripheral milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49(1):36–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. López de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA, Arana JL (2002) Improving the surface finish in high speed milling of stamping dies. J Mater Process Technol 123(2):292–302

  8. Quintana G, Bustillo A, Ciurana J (2012) Prediction, monitoring and control of surface roughness in high-torque milling machine operations. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 25(12):1129–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Beggan C, Woulfe M, Young P, Byrne G (1999) Using acoustic emission to predict surface quality. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(10):737–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Vivancos J, Luis CJ, Ortiz JA, González HA (2005) Analysis of factors affecting the high-speed side milling of hardened die steels. J Mater Process Technol 162-163(SPEC. ISS):696–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Díez-Pastor JF, Bustillo A, Quintana G, García-Osorio C (2012) Boosting projections to improve surface roughness prediction in high-torque milling operations. Soft Comput 16(8):1427–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Choudhury SK, Bartarya G (2003) Role of temperature and surface finish in predicting tool wear using neural network and design of experiments. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 43(7):747–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thangavel P, Selladurai V (2008) An experimental investigation on the effect of turning parameters on surface roughness. Int J Manuf Res 3(3):285–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ho W, Tsai J, Lin B, Chou J (2009) Adaptive network-based fuzzy inference system for prediction of surface roughness in end milling process using hybrid Taguchi-genetic learning algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 36(2 PART 2):3216–3222

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Benardos PG, Vosniakos GC (2002) Prediction of surface roughness in CNC face milling using neural networks and Taguchi’s design of experiments. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 18(5-6):343–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Brezocnik M, Kovacic M (2003) Integrated genetic programming and genetic algorithm approach to predict surface roughness. Mater Manuf Process 18(3):475–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozel T, Karpat Y (2005) Predictive modeling of surface roughness and tool wear in hard turning using regression and neural networks. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(4-5):467–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Bustillo A, Correa M (2012) Using artificial intelligence to predict surface roughness in deep drilling of steel components. J Intell Manuf 23(5):1893–1902

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Dhokia VG, Kumar S, Vichare P, Newman ST (2008) An intelligent approach for the prediction of surface roughness in ball-end machining of polypropylene. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 24(6):835–842

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Vapnik V (2000) The nature of statistical learning theory. Springer Science & Business Media

  21. Drucker H, Burges CJ, Kaufman L, Smola A, Vapnik V (1997) Support vector regression machines. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 9:155–161

    Google Scholar 

  22. Suykens JA, Vandewalle J (1999) Least squares support vector machine classifiers. Neural Process Lett 9(3):293–300

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Lela B, Bajić D, Jozić S (2009) Regression analysis, support vector machines, and Bayesian neural network approaches to modeling surface roughness in face milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42(11-12):1082–1088

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gan B, Huang YJ, Zheng GX (2010) Prediction of surface roughness profiles for milling process with fractal parameters based on LS-SVM. Adv Mater Res 97:1186–1193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Quintana G, Garcia-Romeu ML, Ciurana J (2011) Surface roughness monitoring application based on artificial neural networks for ball-end milling operations. J Intell Manuf 22(4):607–617

  26. Grzenda M, Bustillo A (2013) The evolutionary development of roughness prediction models. Appl Soft Comput 13(5):2913–2922

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yıldız AR (2013) A new hybrid artificial bee colony algorithm for robust optimal design and manufacturing. Appl Soft Comput 13(5):2906–2912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yıldız AR (2009) A novel particle swarm optimization approach for product design and manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40(5-6):617–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. El-Mounayri H, Dugla Z, Deng H (2003) Prediction of surface roughness in end milling using swarm intelligence. In Swarm Intelligence Symposium, SIS'03. Proceedings of the 2003 I.E. pp 220–227

  30. Yıldız AR, Solanki KN (2012) Multi-objective optimization of vehicle crashworthiness using a new particle swarm based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59(1-4):367–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yang XS, Deb S (2009) Cuckoo search via Lévy flights. In nature & biologically inspired computing. NaBIC 2009. World Congress on, IEEE, pp 210–214

  32. Yıldız AR (2013) Cuckoo search algorithm for the selection of optimal machining parameters in milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64(1-4):55–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Chiou JP, Wang FS (1999) Hybrid method of evolutionary algorithms for static and dynamic optimization problems with application to a fed-batch fermentation process. Comput Chem Eng 23(9):1277–1291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Yıldız AR, Ozturk F (2006) Hybrid enhanced genetic algorithm to select optimal machining parameters in turning operation. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manuf 220(12):2041–2053

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Öztürk N, Yıldız AR, Kaya N, Öztürk F (2006) Neuro-genetic design optimization framework to support the integrated robust design optimization process in CE. Concurr Eng 14(1):5–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Yıldız AR (2012) A comparative study of population-based optimization algorithms for turning operations. Inf Sci 210:81–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Bustillo A, Díez-Pastor JF, Quintana G, García-Osorio C (2011) Avoiding neural network fine tuning by using ensemble learning: application to ball-end milling operations. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 57(5-8):521–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. López de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA, Salgado MA (2004) Effects of tool deflection in the high-speed milling of inclined surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 24:9–10

  39. López de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Sánchez JA, Salgado MA (2007) Toolpath selection based on the minimum deflection cutting forces in the programming of complex surfaces milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:388–400

  40. Salgado M, López de Lacalle LN, Lamikiz A, Muñoa M, Sánchez JA (2005) Evaluation of the stiffness chain on the deflection of end-mills under cutting forces. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:727–739

  41. Quiza R, Figueira L, Davim JP (2008) Comparing statistical models and artificial neural networks on predicting the tool wear in hard machining D2 AISI steel. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37(7-8):641–648

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Ezugwu EO, Arthur SJ, Hines EL (1995) Tool-wear prediction using artificial neural networks. J Mater Process Technol 49(3):255–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Li X, Nee AYC (1996) Monitoring cutting conditions for tool scheduling in CNC machining. Manuf Syst 25(4):377–383

    Google Scholar 

  44. Srinivasa P, Nagabhushana TN, Rao PR (2002) Flank wear estimation in face milling based on radial basis function neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 20(4):241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ezugwu EO, Fadare DA, Bonney J, Da Silva RB, Sales WF (2005) Modelling the correlation between cutting and process parameters in high-speed machining of Inconel 718 alloy using an artificial neural network. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45(12):1375–1385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rosenblatt F (1958) The perceptron: a probabilistic model for information storage and organization in the brain. Psychol Rev 65(6):386

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  47. Liu X, Bowyer KW, Hall LO (2004) Decision trees work better than feed-forward back-prop neural nets for a specific class of problems. In Systems, Man and Cybernetics, IEEE International Conference on 6:5969–5974

  48. Hornik K, Stinchcombe M, White H (1989) Multilayer feedforward networks are universal approximators. Neural Netw 2(5):359–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Yegnanarayana B (2009) Artificial neural networks. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.

  50. Bloch G, Denoeux T (2003) Neural networks for process control and optimization: two industrial applications. ISA Trans 42(1):39–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Cybenko G (1989) Approximation by superpositions of a sigmoidal function. Math Control Signals Syst 2(4):303–314

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  52. Broomhead DS, Lowe D (1988) Multivariable functional interpolation and adaptative networks. Complex Syst 2:321–355

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  53. Leonard JA, Kramer MA (1991) Radial basis function networks for classifying process faults. Control Syst IEEE 11(3):31–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Hall M, Frank E, Holmes G, Pfahringer B, Reutemann P, Witten IH (2009) The WEKA data mining software: an update. ACM SIGKDD Explor Newsl 11(1):10–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Cho S, Binsaeid S, Asfour S (2010) Design of multisensor fusion-based tool condition monitoring system in end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 46(5-8):681–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Bustillo A, Ukar E, Rodriguez JJ, Lamikiz A (2011) Modelling of process parameters in laser polishing of steel components using ensembles of regression trees. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 24(8):735–747

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Arthur D, Vassilvitskii, S (2007) k-means++: The advantages of careful seeding. In proceedings of the eighteenth annual ACM-SIAM symposium on discrete algorithms, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, pp 1027–1035

  58. Cameron AC, Windmeijer FA (1997) An R-squared measure of goodness of fit for some common nonlinear regression models. J Econ 77(2):329–342

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  59. Kanungo DP, Sharma S, Pain A (2014) Artificial neural network (ANN) and regression tree (CART) applications for the indirect estimation of unsaturated soil shear strength parameters. Front Earth Sci 8(3):439–456

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Civil Engineering, University of Burgos, Burgos, Spain

    Álvar Arnaiz-González & Andres Bustillo

  2. Department of Mechanical Engineering, ETSI of Bilbao, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Leioa, Vizcaya, Spain

    Asier Fernández-Valdivielso & Luis Norberto López de Lacalle

Authors
  1. Álvar Arnaiz-González
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Asier Fernández-Valdivielso
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Andres Bustillo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luis Norberto López de Lacalle
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres Bustillo.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arnaiz-González, Á., Fernández-Valdivielso, A., Bustillo, A. et al. Using artificial neural networks for the prediction of dimensional error on inclined surfaces manufactured by ball-end milling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 83, 847–859 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7543-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-015-7543-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation