Global analysis of experimental constraints on a possible Higgs-like particle with mass ∼ 125 GeV

1. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Combined search for the standard model Higgs boson using up to 4.9 fb ⁻¹ of pp collision data at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 49 [arXiv:1202.1408] [INSPIRE].

   ADS  Google Scholar 

2. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Combined results of searches for the standard model Higgs boson in pp collisions at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 26 [arXiv:1202.1488] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

3. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for the standard model Higgs boson in the decay channel H → ZZ → 4 leptons in pp collisions at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111804, [arXiv:1202.1997] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

4. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for the Standard Model Higgs boson in the decay channel H-¿ZZ(*)-¿4l with 4.8 fb-1 of pp collision data at sqrt(s) = 7 TeV with ATLAS, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 383 [arXiv:1202.1415] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

5. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying to bottom quarks in pp collisions at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 284 [arXiv:1202.4195] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

6. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the standard model Higgs boson produced in association with a vector boson and decaying to a b-quark pair using up to 4.7 fb ⁻¹ of pp collision data at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV with the ATLAS detector at the LHC, ATLAS-CONF-2012-015 (2012).

7. CMS Collaboration, A search using multivariate techniques for a standard model Higgs boson decaying into two photons, PAS-HIG-12-001 (2012).

8. ATLAS collaboration, G. Aad et al., Search for the standard model Higgs boson in the diphoton decay channel with 4.9 fb ⁻¹ of pp collisions at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV with ATLAS, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 111803 [arXiv:1202.1414] [INSPIRE].

   Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

9. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the standard model Higgs boson in the H → WW → ℓνℓν decay mode with 4.7 fb ⁻¹ of ATLAS data at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2012-012 (2012).

10. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying to a W pair in the fully leptonic final state in pp collisions at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 91 [arXiv:1202.1489] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

11. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying to tau pairs in pp collisions at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 713 (2012) 68 [arXiv:1202.4083] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

12. ATLAS collaboration, Search for the standard model Higgs boson in the H → τ ⁺ τ ⁻ decay mode with 4.7 fb ⁻¹ of ATLAS data at 7 TeV, ATLAS-CONF-2012-014 (2012).

13. CMS collaboration, Search for neutral Higgs bosons decaying into τ leptons in the dimuon channel with CMS in ppcollisions at 7 TeV, PAS-HIG-12-007 (2012).

14. CMS collaboration, Search for WH to 3 leptons, PAS-HIG-11-034 (2011).

15. CMS collaboration, Search for WH in final states with electrons, muons, taus, PAS-HIG-12-006 (2012).

16. CMS collaboration, S. Chatrchyan et al., Search for the standard model Higgs boson decaying into two photons in pp collisions at \( \sqrt {s} = 7 \) TeV, Phys. Lett. B 710 (2012) 403 [arXiv:1202.1487] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

17. TEVNPH, CDF, D0 collaboration, Combined CDF and D0 search for standard model Higgs boson production with up to 10.0 fb ⁻¹ of data, arXiv:1203.3774 [INSPIRE].

18. F. Englert and R. Brout, Broken symmetry and the mass of gauge vector mesons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 321 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

19. P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries and the masses of gauge bosons, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 508 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

20. P.W. Higgs, Broken symmetries, massless particles and gauge fields, Phys. Lett. 12 (1964) 132 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

21. G. Guralnik, C. Hagen and T. Kibble, Global conservation laws and massless particles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 13 (1964) 585 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

22. P.W. Higgs, Spontaneous symmetry breakdown without massless bosons, Phys. Rev. 145 (1966) 1156 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

23. T. Kibble, Symmetry breaking in non-abelian gauge theories, Phys. Rev. 155 (1967) 1554 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

24. J. Ellis and D.S. Hwang, Does the ‘Higgs’ have spin zero?, arXiv:1202.6660 [INSPIRE].

25. D. Carmi, A. Falkowski, E. Kuflik and T. Volansky, Interpreting LHC Higgs results from natural new physics perspective, arXiv:1202.3144 [INSPIRE].

26. M. Dührssen et al., Extracting Higgs boson couplings from CERN LHC data, Phys. Rev. D 70 (2004) 113009 [hep-ph/0406323] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

27. R. Lafaye, T. Plehn, M. Rauch, D. Zerwas and M. Dührssen, Measuring the Higgs sector, JHEP 08 (2009) 009 [arXiv:0904.3866] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

28. G. Giudice, C. Grojean, A. Pomarol and R. Rattazzi, The strongly-interacting light Higgs, JHEP 06 (2007) 045 [hep-ph/0703164] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

29. R. Contino, C. Grojean, M. Moretti, F. Piccinini and R. Rattazzi, Strong double Higgs production at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2010) 089 [arXiv:1002.1011] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

30. R. Contino, The Higgs as a composite Nambu-Goldstone boson, arXiv:1005.4269 [INSPIRE].

31. R. Grober and M. Muhlleitner, Composite Higgs boson pair production at the LHC, JHEP 06 (2011) 020 [arXiv:1012.1562] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

32. A. Azatov, R. Contino and J. Galloway, Model-independent bounds on a light Higgs, JHEP 04 (2012) 127 [arXiv:1202.3415] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

33. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean, M. Muhlleitner and M. Trott, Fingerprinting Higgs suspects at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2012) 097 [arXiv:1202.3697] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

34. P.P. Giardino, K. Kannike, M. Raidal and A. Strumia, Reconstructing Higgs boson properties from the LHC and Tevatron data, arXiv:1203.4254 [INSPIRE].

35. T. Li, X. Wan, Y.-k. Wang and S.-h. Zhu, Constraints on the universal varying Yukawa couplings: from SM-like to fermiophobic, arXiv:1203.5083 [INSPIRE].

36. M. Rauch, Determination of Higgs-boson couplings (SFitter), arXiv:1203.6826 [INSPIRE].

37. XLVIIth Rencontres de Moriond , March 4–10, La Thuile, Italy (2012).

38. W.D. Goldberger, B. Grinstein and W. Skiba, Distinguishing the Higgs boson from the dilaton at the Large Hadron Collider, Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2008) 111802 [arXiv:0708.1463] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

39. J. Fan, W.D. Goldberger, A. Ross and W. Skiba, Standard model couplings and collider signatures of a light scalar, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 035017 [arXiv:0803.2040] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

40. L. Vecchi, Phenomenology of a light scalar: the dilaton, Phys. Rev. D 82 (2010) 076009 [arXiv:1002.1721] [INSPIRE]

    ADS  Google Scholar 

41. B. Grinstein and P. Uttayarat, A very light dilaton, JHEP 07 (2011) 038 [arXiv:1105.2370] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

42. V. Barger, M. Ishida and W.-Y. Keung, Dilaton at the LHC, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 015024 [arXiv:1111.2580] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

43. B. Coleppa, T. Gregoire and H.E. Logan, Dilaton constraints and LHC prospects, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 055001 [arXiv:1111.3276] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

44. B.A. Campbell, J. Ellis and K.A. Olive, Phenomenology and cosmology of an electroweak pseudo-dilaton and electroweak baryons, JHEP 03 (2012) 026 [arXiv:1111.4495] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

45. K. Yamawaki, M. Bando and K.-i. Matumoto, Scale invariant technicolor model and a technidilaton, Phys. Rev. Lett. 56 (1986) 1335 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

46. M. Bando, K.-i. Matumoto and K. Yamawaki, Technidilaton, Phys. Lett. B 178 (1986) 308 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

47. D.D. Dietrich, F. Sannino and K. Tuominen, Light composite Higgs from higher representations versus electroweak precision measurements: predictions for CERN LHC, Phys. Rev. D 72 (2005) 055001 [hep-ph/0505059] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

48. K. Yamawaki, Conformal Higgs, or techni-dilaton- composite Higgs near conformality, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 25 (2010) 5128 [arXiv:1008.1834] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

49. M. Hashimoto and K. Yamawaki, Techni-dilaton at conformal edge, Phys. Rev. D 83 (2011) 015008 [arXiv:1009.5482] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

50. A. Delgado, K. Lane and A. Martin, A light scalar in low-scale technicolor, Phys. Lett. B 696 (2011) 482 [arXiv:1011.0745] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

51. O. Antipin, M. Mojaza and F. Sannino, Light dilaton at fixed points and ultra light scale super Yang-Mills, Phys. Lett. B 712 (2012) 119 [arXiv:1107.2932] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

52. S. Matsuzaki and K. Yamawaki, Techni-dilaton signatures at LHC, Prog. Theor. Phys. 127 (2012) 209 [arXiv:1109.5448] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

53. D.B. Kaplan and H. Georgi, SU(2) × U(1) breaking by vacuum misalignment, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 183 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

54. D.B. Kaplan, H. Georgi and S. Dimopoulos, Composite Higgs scalars, Phys. Lett. B 136 (1984) 187 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

55. C. Csáki, J. Hubisz and S.J. Lee, Radion phenomenology in realistic warped space models, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 125015 [arXiv:0705.3844] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

56. H. de Sandes and R. Rosenfeld, Radion-Higgs mixing effects on bounds from LHC Higgs searches, Phys. Rev. D 85 (2012) 053003 [arXiv:1111.2006] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

57. K. Cheung and T.-C. Yuan, Could the excess seen at 124–126 GeV be due to the Randall-Sundrum radion?, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (2012) 141602 [arXiv:1112.4146] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

58. K. Agashe, R. Contino and A. Pomarol, The minimal composite Higgs model, Nucl. Phys. B 719 (2005) 165 [hep-ph/0412089] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

59. K. Agashe and R. Contino, The minimal composite Higgs model and electroweak precision tests, Nucl. Phys. B 742 (2006) 59 [hep-ph/0510164] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

60. R. Barbieri, B. Bellazzini, V.S. Rychkov and A. Varagnolo, The Higgs boson from an extended symmetry, Phys. Rev. D 76 (2007) 115008 [arXiv:0706.0432] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

61. C. Anastasiou, E. Furlan and J. Santiago, Realistic composite Higgs models, Phys. Rev. D 79 (2009) 075003 [arXiv:0901.2117] [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

62. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean and M. Muhlleitner, Composite Higgs search at the LHC, JHEP 05 (2010) 065 [arXiv:1003.3251] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

63. J. Espinosa, C. Grojean and M. Muhlleitner, Composite Higgs under LHC experimental scrutiny, arXiv:1202.1286 [INSPIRE].

64. R. Rattazzi, EWSB after the first hints of a Higgs, talk at the ETH Zurich workshop “Higgs searches confronts theory”, Januray 9–11, Zurich, Switzerland (2012).

65. E. Gabrielli, B. Mele and M. Raidal, Has a fermiophobic Higgs boson been detected at the LHC?, arXiv:1202.1796 [INSPIRE].

66. G. Cacciapaglia, C. Csáki, G. Marandella and J. Terning, The gaugephobic Higgs, JHEP 02 (2007) 036 [hep-ph/0611358] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

67. S. Weinberg, Nonlinear realizations of chiral symmetry, Phys. Rev. 166 (1968) 1568 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

68. S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 1, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2239 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

69. C.G. Callan Jr., S.R. Coleman, J. Wess and B. Zumino, Structure of phenomenological Lagrangians. 2, Phys. Rev. 177 (1969) 2247 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

70. A. Salam and J. Strathdee, Nonlinear realizations. 2. Conformal symmetry, Phys. Rev. 184 (1969) 1760 [INSPIRE].

    Article  MathSciNet  ADS  Google Scholar 

71. J.R. Ellis, Aspects of conformal symmetry and chirality, Nucl. Phys. B 22 (1970) 478 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

72. T. Appelquist and C.W. Bernard, Strongly interacting Higgs bosons, Phys. Rev. D 22 (1980) 200 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

73. J.R. Ellis, M.K. Gaillard and D.V. Nanopoulos, A phenomenological profile of the Higgs boson, Nucl. Phys. B 106 (1976) 292 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

74. R. Crewther, Nonperturbative evaluation of the anomalies in low-energy theorems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 28 (1972) 1421 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

75. M.S. Chanowitz and J.R. Ellis, Canonical anomalies and broken scale invariance, Phys. Lett. B 40 (1972) 397 [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

76. M.S. Chanowitz and J.R. Ellis, Canonical trace anomalies, Phys. Rev. D 7 (1973) 2490 [INSPIRE].

    ADS  Google Scholar 

77. S. Kraml et al., Searches for new physics: Les Houches recommendations for the presentation of LHC results, Eur. Phys. J. C 72 (2012) 1976 [arXiv:1203.2489] [INSPIRE].

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references