Abstract
Frequently when patient and study identification information (patient name, patient identification, date of birth, sex, and accession number) are manually entered at a modality, typographical errors occur that have to be corrected before the acquired images can be matched to the proper patient and study on a picture archiving and communication system (PACS). The Digital Imaging and Communication in Medicine (DICOM) Modality Worklist service alleviates these problems by automatically transferring this data from the radiology information system (RIS) to the image acquisition modality. The technologist then does not have to manually re-enter the data to place it into the image files. With modality worklist, precise patient and study data are obtained and placed into the image headers with no typographical errors. When the images are sent to the PACS, they match the corresponding patient and study records, and are immediately incorporated into the electronic patient record. While modality worklist does replace the manual keying of the data and virtually eliminates typographical problems, it introduces a new source of human error: the incorrect selection of the patient and/or study from the computerized worklist, and the resultant mislabeling of the images. When these mislabeled images are sent to the PACS, they are immediately associated with the wrong patient and/or study, where they potentially may cause serious harm. The goal of this report is to raise awareness to this problem, to identify the major causes of these errors, and to offer some practical suggestions on how to minimize them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.References
Kuzmak PM, Dayhoff RE: The Department of Veterans Affairs Integration of Imaging into the Healthcare Enterprise using the VistA Hospital Information System and Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine. J Digit Imaging 11: 53–64, 1998
Dayhoff RE, Kuzmak PM, Kirin G, et al: Providing a Complete Online Multimedia Patient Record. Proceeding of the Fall 1999 AMIA Conference, Washington, DC, November 1999
Kuzmak PM, Dayhoff RE: Multidisciplinary HIS DICOM Interfaces, Medical Imaging 2000: PACS design and evaluation: Engineering and clinical issues. Proc SPIE 3980:35–43, 2000
Oosterwijk H, Csipo D, Kuzmak PM, et al: Modality Interface DICOM Conformance Requirements, Version 1.2. http://www.va.gov/oa&mm/busopp/formats.htm, September 7, 1999 p
HIMSS & RSNA, Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise, IHE Technical Framework, Revision 3.0. http://www.RSNA. org/IHE, April 26, 1999
Digital Imaging Communication in Medicine (DICOM), NEMA Standards Publication PS 3. Washington, DC, National Electrical Manufacturers Association, 1999
Reiner B, Siegel E, Kuzmak P, et al: Transmission failure rate for CT exams in a filmless imaging department. J Digit Imaging 13:79–82, 2000 (suppl 1)
Gale ME, Gale DR: DICOM modality worklist: An essential component in a PACS environment. J Digit Imaging 13: 101–108, 2000
Pagan J: Reconciling radiology examinations or house-keeping of radiology data. Jackson, MS, Department of Radiology, Sonny Montgomery VA Medical Center, personal communication
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This is a US government work. There are no restrictions on its use.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kuzmak, P.M., Dayhoff, R.E. Minimizing Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (DICOM) Modality Worklist patient/study selection errors. Journal of Digital Imaging 14 (Suppl 1), 153–157 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190323
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03190323