Hardware and software requirements for a picture archiving and communication system’s diagnostic workstations

1. Huang HK, Kangarloo H, Cho PS, et al: Planning a totally digital radiology department. Am J Roentgenol 154:635–639, 1990

   CAS  Google Scholar 

2. Goeringer F: Medical diagnostic imaging support systems for military medicine. SPIE Medical Imaging V 1444: 340–350, 1991

   Google Scholar 

3. Haynor DR, Weghorst S, Saarinen AO, et al: Clinical evaluation of PACS workstations-methodology and results. SPIE Medical Imaging IV 1234:408–417, 1990

   Google Scholar 

4. Haynor DR, Kim Y: Digital radiology system requirements document. Center for imaging system optimization, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, 1991

   Google Scholar 

5. MDIS: Performance Work Statement of the Medical Diagnostic Imaging Support System. US Army Eng Div, Huntsville, AL, No. DACA87-90-R-0058, 1990

   Google Scholar 

6. Arenson RL, Chakraborty DP, Seshadri SB, et al: The digital imaging workstation. Radiology 176:303–315, 1990

   CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

7. Pizer SM, Beard DV: Medical image work stations: functions and implementation. J Digital Imaging 2:189–93, 1989

   Google Scholar 

8. Proceedings of the SPIE Conferences on Medical Imaging: Society of Photo-optical Instrumentation Engineers, Bellingham, WA, 1982–1992

9. Levin K, Horii S, Mun SK, et al: Analysis of data assembling activities for radiologists and its implications for clinical acceptance of PACS. SPIE Medical Imaging 1234: 670–675, 1990

   Google Scholar 

10. Fisher P, Grover B, Brauer G, et al: Digital image display station performance requirements based on physician experience with a prototype system. J Digital Imaging 2:150–155, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

11. Roger E, Goldberg M, Dillon RF: Image organization and navigation strategies for a radiological work station. J Digital Imaging 2:229–244, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

12. Haynor DR, Saarinen AO: The old study and the correlative study: Implications for PACS. SPIE Medical Imaging III 1093:10–12, 1989

    Google Scholar 

13. Hedgcock MW, Levitt T, Karshat W, et al: Database requirements for PACS: SPIE Medical Imaging IV 1234:588–592, 1990

    Google Scholar 

14. Sheng OR, Wang H, Garcia HC: IRES-Image retrieval expert system. SPIE Medical Imaging IV 1234:832–841, 1990

    Google Scholar 

15. D Beard: Designing a radiology workstation: a focus on navigation during the interpretation task. J Digital Imaging 3:152–163, 1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

16. Saarinen AO, Wilson MC, Iverson SC, et al: PACS economics and the referring physician. SPIE Medical Imaging 1234:806–816, 1990

    Google Scholar 

17. Arenson RL, Seshadri SB, Kundel HL, et al: Clinical evaluation of a medical image management system for chest images. Am J Roentgenol 150:55–59, 1988

    CAS  Google Scholar 

18. Beard D, Parrish D, Stevenson D: A cost analysis of film image management and four PACS based on different network protocols. J Digital Imaging 3:108–118, 1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

19. National Electrical Manufacturers Association: Digital imaging and communication. ACR-NEMA Standards Publication, No. 300-1985, 1985, and No. 300-1988, 1988

20. Keller PA: Cathode-ray tube displays for medical imaging. J Digital Imaging 3:15–25, 1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

21. Cox GG, Cook LT, McMillan JH, et al: Chest radiography: comparison of high-resolution digital displays with conventional and digital film. Radiology 176:771–776, 1990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

22. Slasky BS, Gur D, Good WF, et al: Receiver operating characteristic analysis of chest image interpretation with conventional, laser-printed, and high-resolution workstation images. Radiology 174:775–780, 1990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

23. Murphey MD, Bramble JM, Cook LT, et al: Nondisplaced fractures: spatial resolution requirements for detection with digital skeletal imaging. Radiology 174:865–870, 1990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

24. Wegryn SA, Piraino DW, Richmond BJ, et al: Comparison of digital and conventional musculoskeletal radiography: an observer performance study. Radiology 175:225–228, 1990

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

25. Murphey MD: Digital skeletal radiography: spatial resolution requirements for detection of subperiosteal resorption. Am J Roengtenol 152:541–546, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

26. Murphey MD, Huang HK, Siegel EL, et al: Clinical experience in the use of photostimulable phosphor radiographic systems. Invest Radiol 26:590–597, 1991

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27. Gross GW, Ehrlich SM, Wang Y: Diagnostic quality of portable abdominal radiographs in neonates with necrotizing enterocolitis. Am J Roentgenol 154:779–783, 1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

28. Erdekian VV, Trombetta SP: Display systems for medical imaging. SPIE Medical Imaging V 1444:151–158, 1991

    Google Scholar 

29. Roehrig H, Blume H, Ji TL, Browne M: Performance tests and quality control of cathode ray tube displays. J Digital Imaging 3:134–145, 1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

30. Beard D, Cromartie R, Creasy J, et al: Experiment comparing image-locating on film and the FILM-PLANE workstation. SPIE Medical Imaging II 914:933–937, 1988

    Google Scholar 

31. Horii S, Horii H, Mun SK, et al: Environmental designs for reading from imaging workstations: ergonomic and architectural features. J Digital Imaging 2:156–162, 1989

    CAS  Google Scholar 

32. Ohhashi A, Yamada S, Haruki K, et al: Automatic adjustment of display window (gray-level) for MR images using a neural network. SPIE Medical Imaging V 1444:63–74, 1991

    Google Scholar 

33. Murphey MD, Bramble JM, Cox GC, et al: Experience in the use of an image-processing workstation for a photostimulabel phosphor radiographic system. J Digital Imaging 3:60–65, 1990

    CAS  Google Scholar 

34. MacMahon H, Doi K, Chan HP, et al: Computeraided diagnosis in chest radiology. J Thorac Imaging 5:67–76, 1990

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

35. Swett HA, Fisher PR, Cohn AI, et al: Expert system-controlled image display. Radiology 172:487–493, 1989

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

36. Piraino D, Richmond B, Schluchter M, et al: Radiology image interpretation system: modified observer performance study of an image interpretation expert system. J Digital Imaging 4:94–101, 1991

    CAS  Google Scholar 

37. Apicella PL, Blaine GJ, Jost RG: A prototype of a high-resolution computerized radiology teaching file. J Digital Imaging 4:43–50, 1991

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references