Abstract
Discussed several issues related to psychological empowerment. The thesis of this paper is that the development of a universal and global measure of psychological empowerment may not be a feasible or appropriate goal. I begin by distinguishing between empowerment processes and outcomes. Underlying assumptions are discussed including the notion that empowerment differs across people, contexts, and times. A nomological network that includes intrapersonal, interactional, and behavioral components is also presented. Two examples of psychological empowerment for voluntary service organization members and members of a mutual help organization are described to help illustrate differences in the specific variables that may be used to measure psychological empowerment in different populations and settings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Balcazar, F. E., Seekins, T., Fawcett, S. B., & Hopkins, B. L., (1990). Empowering people with physical disabilities through advocacy skills training.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 281–296.
Grown, L. D. (1993). Social change through collective reflection with Asian nongovernmental development organizations.Human Relations, 46, 249–273.
Carr, T. H., Dixon, M. C., & Ogles, R. M. (1976). Perceptions of community life which distinguish between participants and nonparticipants in a neighborhood self-help organization.American Journal of Community Psychology, 4, 357–366.
Chavis, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 55–81.
Chekcoway, B., & Doyle, M. (1980). Community organizing lessons for health care consumers.Journal of Health Politics, Policy, and Law, 5, 213–226.
Chesler, M. A. (1991). Participatory action research with self-help groups: An alternative paradigm for inquiry and action.American Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 757–768.
Coopersmith, S. (1967).The antecedents of self-esteem. San Francisco: Freeman.
Cornell Empowerment Group. (1989). Empowerment and family support.Networking Bulletin, 1, 1–23.
Cottrell, L. S., Jr. (1983). The competent community. In R. Warren & L. Lyon (Eds.),New perspectives on the American community (pp. 398–432). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.
Cronbach, L. J., & Meehl, P. E. (1955). Construct validity in psychological tests,Psychological Bulletin, 52, 281–302.
Denney, W. M. (1979). Participant citizenship in a marginal group: Union membership of California farm workers.American Journal of Political Science, 23, 330–337.
Elden, M., & Chisolm, R. F. (Eds.) (1993). Emerging varieties of action research: Introduction to the special issue.Human Relations, 46, 121–142.
Fairweather, G. W., Sanders, D. H., & Torntzky, L. G., (1969).Community life for the mentally ill: An alternative to alternate care. Chicago, IL: Aldine.
Fish, J. (1973).Black power/white control: The struggle of the Woodlawn Organization in Chicago. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Florin, P., & Wandersman, A. (1984). Cognitive social learning and participation in community development.American Journal of Community Psychology, 12, 689–708.
Freire, P. (1973).Education for critical consciousness. New York: Seabury.
Gruber, J., & Trickett, E. J. (1987). Can we empower others? The paradox of empowerment in the governing of an alternative public school.American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 353–371.
Hall, R. H. (Ed.) (1992). Participatory research, Part I.American Sociologist, 23 (Whole issue).
Harter, S. (1990). Causes, correlates, and the functional role of global self-worth: A life-span perspective. In R. J. Sternberg & J. Kolligan, Jr. (Eds.).Competence considered (pp. 67–97). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Iscoe, I. (1974). Community Psychology and the compenent community.American Psychologist, 29, 607–613.
Kelly, J. G. (1971). Qualities for the community psychologist.American Psychologist, 26, 897–903.
Kelly, J. G. (1988). A guide to conducting prevention research in the community: First steps.Prevention in Human Services, 6, 1–174.
Kieffer, C. H. (1984). Citizen empowerment: A developmental perspective.Prevention in Human Services, 3, 9–36.
Langer, E. J. (1979). The illusion of incompetence. In L. V. Perlmutter & R. A. Monty (Eds.),Choice and perceived control (pp. 301–313). Hillsdale, NJ: Erbaum.
Maton, K. E., & Salem, D. A. (1995). Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case study approach.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23,
McGrath, J. E. (1982). Dilemmatics: The study of research choices and dilemmas. In J. E. McGrath, J. Martin, & R. A. Kulka (Eds.),Judgment calls in research (pp. 69–102). Beverly Hills: Sage.
Mechanic, D. (1991, February).Adolescents at risk: New directions. Paper presented at the annual Conference on Health Policy, Cornell University Medical College.
O'Sullivan, M. J., Waugh, N., & Espeland, W. (1984). The Fort McDowell Yavapai: From pawns to powerbrokers.Prevention in Human Services, 3, 73–97.
Paulhus, D. (1983). Sphere-specific measures of perceived control.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44, 1253–1265.
Perkins, D. D., Florin, P., Rich, R. C., Wandersman, A., & Chavis, D. M. (1990). Participation and the social and physical environment of residential blocks: Crime and community context.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 83–116.
Piven, F. F., & Cloward, R. A. (1977).Poor people's movements: Why they succeed, how they fail. New York: Vintage.
Prestby, J. E., Wandersman, A., Florin, P., Rich, R., & Chavis, D. M. (1990). Benefits, costs, incentive management, and participations in voluntary organization: A means to understanding and promoting empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 117–149.
Rappaport, J. (1981). In praise of paradox: A social policy of empowerment over prevention.American Journal of Community Psychology, 9, 1–25.
Rappaport, J. (1984). Studies in empowerment: Introduction to the issue.Prevention in Human Services, 3, 1–7.
Rappaport, J. (1987). Terms of empowerment/exemplars of prevention: Toward a theory for community psychology.American Journal of Community Psychology, 15, 121–148.
Rappaport, J. (1990). Research methods and the empowerment social agenda. In P. Tolan, C. Keys, F. Chertok, & L. Jason (Eds.),Researching community psychology: Integrating theories and methodologies (pp. 51–63). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Rappaport, J., Reischl, T. M., & Zimmerman, M. A. (1991). Mutual help mechanisms in the empowerment of former mental patients. In D. Saleebey (Ed.),The strengths perspective in social work practice: Power in the people. White Plains, NY: Longman.
Rich, R. C., Edelstein, M., Hallman, W. K., & Wandersman, A. H. (1995). Citizen participation and empowerment: The case of local environmental hazards.American Journal of Community Psychology, 23, 657–676.
Roesch, R., & Golding, S. L. (1980).Competency to stand trial. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
Stone, R. A., & Levine, A. G. (1985). Reactions to collective stress: Correlates of active citizen participation.Prevention in Human Services, 4, 153–177.
Strecher, V. T., DeVellis, B. M., Becker, M. H., & Rosenstock, I. M. (1986). The role of self-efficacy in achieving health behavior change.Health Education Quarterly, 13, 73–92.
Sue, S., & Zane, N. (1980). Learned helplessness theory and community psychology. In M. S. Gibbs, J. R. Lachenmeyer, & J. Sigal (Eds.).Community Psychology: Theoretical and empirical approaches (pp. 121–143). New York: Gardner.
Whyte, W. F. (1991).Participatory action research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
Yeich, S., & Levine, R. (1992). Participatory research's contribution to a conceptualization of empowerment.Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 1894–1908.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1990a). Taking aim on empowerment research: On the distinction between psychological and individual conceptions.American Journal of Community Psychology, 18, 169–177.
Zimmerman, M. A. (1990b). Toward a theory of learned hopefulness: A structural model analysis of participation and empowerment.Journal of Research in Personality, 24, 71–86.
Zimmerman, M. A. (in press). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.),The handbook of community psychology, New York: Plenum Press.
Zimmerman, M. A., Israel, B. A., Schulz, A., & Checkoway, B. (1992). Further explorations in empowerment theory: An empirical analysis of psychological empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 20, 707–727.
Zimmerman, M. A., Ramirez, J., Suarez, E., de la Rosa, G., & Castro, M. A. (1994).Empowering processes: An example from an HIV/AIDS prevention project for Mexican homosexual men. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Public health Association, Washington, DC.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Rappaport, J. (1988). Citizen participation, perceived control, and psychological empowerment.American Journal of Community Psychology, 16, 725–750.
Zimmerman, M. A., & Zahniser, J. H. (1991). Refinements of sphere-specific measures of perceived control: Development of a socio-political control scale.Journal of Community Psychology, 19, 189–204.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
I thank Deborah A. Salem for her thoughtful comments on earlier drafts of this paper and for her persistence in pushing me to strengthen the ideas presented. I also thank Douglas Perkins, Julian Rappaport, David Altman, and James G. Kelly for their very helpful comments. They helped me articulate my ideas more carefully and clearly.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zimmerman, M.A. Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. Am J Commun Psychol 23, 581–599 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983