Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Foreign patenting activity in some of the world major patent systems is being compared between countries and industries and is found to be, with a few notable exceptions, relatively unbiased. Furthermore, a brief dynamic analysis of the foreign patenting activity in the USA of a number of OECD-countries in 41 industrial sectors in terms of ‘Revealed Technological Advantage’ indices suggests that foreign patent data might provide a very useful addition to the arsenal of Science and Technology Output Indicators.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. H. ZUCKERMAN, R. B. MILLER (Eds.), Science Indicators: Implications for Research and Policy,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) Nos 5-6.

  2. OECD, Committee for Scientific and Technological Policy,Preliminary Report of the Results of the Conference on Science and Technology Indicators, Paris, 1981, mimeo.

  3. J. SCHMOOKLER,Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass. 1966.

    Google Scholar 

  4. F. M. SCHERER, Industrial Market Structure, Opportunity and the Output of Patented Inventions,American Economic Review, 55 (1965), December.

  5. N. ROSENBERG,Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1976.

    Google Scholar 

  6. V. WALSH, J. TOWNSEND, Trends in Invention and Innovation in the Chemical Industry, Report to the U.K. Social Science Research Council, Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, 1980, mimeo.

  7. J. CLARK, C. FREEMAN, L. SOETE, Long Waves, Inventions and Innovations,Futures, 13 (1981) No. 4, August.

  8. C. FREEMAN, J. CLARK, L. SOETE,Unemployment and Technical Innovation: A Study of Long Waves and Economic Development, Frances Pinter, London, 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  9. L. SOETE, Firm Size and Inventive Activity: the Evidence Reconsidered,European Economic Review, 12 (1979).

  10. L. SOETE, The Measurement of Inventive Activity and its Relation to Firm Size, Paper prepared for the 6th Conference of the EARIE, Paris, September 9–12, 1979, mimeo.

  11. W. S. COMANOR, F. M. SCHERER, Patent Statistics as a Measure of Technical Change,Journal of Political Economy, 77 (1969) December.

  12. OECD,Mise au point d'indicateurs pour la mesure de l'output des activités de R-D: Premiers résultats et plan des futurs travaux, Comité de la Politique Scientifique et Technologique, SPT (79) 26, Paris, 22nd Novembre 1979, mimeo.

  13. P. MARSTRAND,Patterns of Change in Biotechnology, SPRU Occasional Paper No. 15, June 1981.

  14. U.S. Science Indicators (1976), Report of the National Science Board 1977, National Science Foundation.

  15. R. MCCULLOCH, International Indicators of Science and Technology: How does the U.S. compare?,Scientometrics, 2 (1980) Nos 5-6.

  16. L. SOETE,Inventive Activity, Industrial Organisation and International Trade, University of Sussex, D. Phil. Thesis, June, 1978.

  17. K. PAVITT, L. SOETE, Innovative Activities and Export Shares: Some Comparisons Between Industries and Countries, in: K. PAVITT (Ed.),Technical Innovation and British Economic Performance, Macmillan, London, 1980.

    Google Scholar 

  18. L. SOETE, The Impact of Technological Innovation on International Trade Patterns: the Evidence Reconsidered, Paper presented at OECD Science and Technology Indicators Conference, STIC/80-33, Paris, September 15–19, 1980.

  19. L. SOETE, A General Test of Technological Gap Trade Theory,Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv, 117 (1981) Heft 4.

  20. K. PAVITT, L. SOETE, International Differences in Economic Growth and the International Location of Innovation, in: H. GIERSCH (Ed.),Emerging Technologies: Consequences for Economic Growth, Structural Change and Employment in Advanced Open Economies, J.C.B. Mohr, Tubingen 1982.

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. de SOLLA PRICE, The Analysis of Scientometric Matrices for Policy Implications,Scientometrics, 3 (1981) No. 1.

  22. U.S. Science Indicators (1978), Report of the National Science Board 1979, National Science Foundation.

  23. Office of Technology Assessment and Forecast, U.S. Patent and Trademark office,Indicators of Patent Output of U.S. Industry, IV, U.S. Patenting 55 SIC Product Fields (1963–79), prepared for Science Indicators Unit, National Science Foundation, August 1980.

  24. World Intellectual Property Organisation (WIPO),Industrial Property Statistics 1978–79, Geneva, 1981.

  25. H. GREVINK, H. KRONZ,Evolution of Patent Filing Activities in the EEC, Commission of the European Communities, EUR 6574 e, 1979.

  26. H. GREVINK, H. KRONZ,Evolution of Patent Filing Activities in the USA, Commission of the European Communities, EUR 6575 e, 1980.

  27. L. SOETE, S. WYATT, Domestic and Foreign Patenting in the USA and the EEC, OECD Workshop on Patent and Innovation Statistics, DSTI/SPR/82.29, Paris, May. 24, 1982.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Science Policy Research Unit, University of Sussex, Falmer, BN1 9RF, Brighton, (UK)

    L. G. Soete & Sally M. E. Wyatt

Authors
  1. L. G. Soete
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Sally M. E. Wyatt
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Soete, L.G., Wyatt, S.M.E. The use of foreign patenting as an internationally comparable science and technology output indicator. Scientometrics 5, 31–54 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097176

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02097176

Keywords

Search

Navigation