Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

In vitro investigations of internal fixation systems of the upper cervical spine

II. Stability of posterior atlanto-axial fixation techniques

  • Original Articles
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Résumé

L'instabilité C1-C2 est le plus souvent traitée chirurgicalement. Selon l'indication, peuvent être proposées soit une ostéosynthèse par vissage direct de l'odontoïde, soit une arthrodèse C1-C2. Dans cette étude expérimentale in vitro, on a comparé au plan biomécanique, les trois différentes techniques d'arthrodèse atlanto-axoïdiennes, selon Gallie, Brooks et Magerl. 16 segments C1-C2 présentant des fractures de type II et III ont été testés in vitro dans des conditions bien définies. On a appliqué des moments de flexion et d'extension, des forces de cisaillement antérieur et postérieur et des moments de torsion vers la droite et vers la gauche, et l'on a analysé la mobilité de C1-C2. Les résultats de cette investigation ont clairement démontré que les segments traités par la technique de Magerl avec des vis transarticulaires, présentaient la plus grande rigidité, en comparaison des méthodes de cerclage de Brooks et de Gallie. Ces différences étaient plus évidentes dans le cas du cisaillement postérieur et de la torsion. Dans ces conditions de contrainte, le rapport de rigidité Magerl/Brooks/Gallie était de 10/2/1. Des différences significatives de déformation plastique ont été retrouvées entre les différentes fixations C1-C2 au cours des premiers cycles de mise en charge et décharge, qui renseignent sur la relation entre la stabilité primaire et à long terme.

Summary

Unstable C1-C2 segments are generally treated surgically. Depending on the indication a direct screw fixation of the odontoid or a C1-C2 arthrodesis is a possible technique. In this experimental in vitro study the three different atlantoaxial fusion techniques by Gallie, Brooks, and Magerl were compared biomechanically. Sixteen human C1-C2 segments with odontoid fractures of type II and III were investigated under standardized conditions. Flexion and extension moments, anterior, and posterior shear forces, left and right torsional moments were applied, and the motion of C1 relative to C2 was determined. The results of this investigation show clearly that the segments treated with the technique by Magerl with transarticular screws achieved the highest stiffness, compared to the wiring methods of Brooks and Gallie. These differences were most evident for posterior shear forces and for torsional moments. For these load conditions the ratio of stiffness Magerl: Brooks: Gallie was about 10:2:1. Significant differences for the plastic deformation of the differently fixed C1-C2 segments were found within the first few load/unload cycles, which give information about the relationship between primary and long-term stability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

References

  1. Boehler J (1982) Anterior stabilization for acute fractures and non-unions of the dens. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 64:18–24

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boehler J (1986) Operative treatment of injuries to cervical spine. Orthop Rev 15:58–59

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brooks AL, Jenkins EB (1978) Atlanto-axial arthrodesis by the wedge compression method. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 60:279–284

    Google Scholar 

  4. Clark CR, White AA (1985) Fractures of the dens. A multicenter study. J Bone Joint Surg [Am] 67:1340–1348

    Google Scholar 

  5. Crisco JJ, Panjabi MM, Oda T, Grob D, Dvorak J (1991) Bone graft translation of four upper cervical spine fixation techniques in a caderveric model. J Orthop Res 9:835–846

    Google Scholar 

  6. Etter CH, Coscia M, Ganz R, Aebi M (1989) Die Schrauben-osteosynthese von Densfrakturen. Operationstechnische Aspekte und Ergebnisse. Unfallchirugie 92:220–226

    Google Scholar 

  7. Fried LC (1973) Atlanto-axial fracture dislocations. Failure of posterior C1 to C2 fusion. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 55:490–496

    Google Scholar 

  8. Gallie WE (1939) Fractures and dislocations of the cervical spine. Am J Surg 46:495–499

    Google Scholar 

  9. Glynn MK, Sheehan (1983) JM Fusion of the cervical spine for instability. Clin Orthop 179:97–101

    Google Scholar 

  10. Grob D, Magerl F (1987) Operative Stabilisierung bei Frakturen von C1 and C2. Orthopäde 16:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  11. Grob D, Dvorak J, Panjabi M, Hayek J (1991) Die dorsale atlanto-axiale Verschraubung. Orthopäde 20:154–162

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grob D, Jeanneret B, Aebi M, Markwalder T-M (1991) Atlanto-acial fusion with transarticular screw fixation. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 73:972–976

    Google Scholar 

  13. Grob D, Crisco JJ, Panjabi MM, Wang P, Dvorak J (1992) Biomechanical evaluation of four different posterior atlanto-axial fixation techniques. Spine 17:480–490

    Google Scholar 

  14. Grob D, Jeanneret B, Aebi M, Markwalder T (1992) Complication of the atlanto-axial fusion with transarticular screw-fixation. Cervical Spine Research Society, 3rd Common Meeting, Athens 25–28 June, p 119

  15. Hanson P, Montesano PX, Sharkey N, Rauschning W (1991) Anatomic and biomechanical assessment of transarticular screw fixation for atlanto-axial instability. Spine 16:1141–1145

    Google Scholar 

  16. Harvell JC Jr, Hanley EN Jr (1988) Immediate post-operative stability of the atlanto-axial articulation: a biomechanical study comparing simple midline wiring, the Gallie and the Brooks Procedures. Proceedings 16th Annual Meeting Cervical Spine Research Society, November–December, pp 108–109

  17. Knörringer P (1984) Zur Behandlung frischer Frakturen des Dens axis durch Kompressionsschraubenosteosynthese. Neurochirurgia 27:68–72

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lesoin F, Autricque A, Franz K, Jomin M, Villette L (1987) Transcervical approach and screw fixation for upper cervicalspine pathology. Surg Neurol 27:459–465

    Google Scholar 

  19. Magerl F, Seemann P-S (1987) Stable posterior fusion of the atlas and axis by transarticular scree fixation. In: Kehr P, Weildner A (eds) Cervical spine 1, Strasbourg 1985, Springer, Vienna, pp 322–327

    Google Scholar 

  20. McGraw RW, Rusch RM (1973) Atlanto-axial arthrodesis. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 55:482–489

    Google Scholar 

  21. Simmons EH, Du Toit G Jr (1978) Lateral atlantoaxial arthrodesis. Orthop Clin Am 9:1101–1114

    Google Scholar 

  22. Smith MD, Kotzar GMS, Yoo J, Bohlmann H (1989) A biomechanical analysis of atlanto-axial stabilization methods using a bovine model. Presented at the Cervical Spine Society, Seventeenth Annual Meeting, New Orleans, Dec. 5–8, p 6

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wilke, H.J., Fischer, K., Kugler, A. et al. In vitro investigations of internal fixation systems of the upper cervical spine. Eur Spine J 1, 191–199 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301312

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00301312

Mots-clés

Key words

Navigation