Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Opacity Generalised to Transition Systems

  • Conference paper
Formal Aspects in Security and Trust (FAST 2005)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNSC,volume 3866))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

Recently, opacity has proved a promising technique for describing security properties. Much of the work has been couched in terms of Petri nets. Here, we extend the notion of opacity to the model of labelled transition systems and generalise opacity in order to better represent concepts from the literature on information flow. In particular, we establish links between opacity and the information flow concepts of anonymity and non-inference. We also investigate ways of verifying opacity when working with Petri nets. Our work is illustrated by an example modelling requirements upon a simple voting system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abadi, M., Cortier, V.: Deciding Knowledge in Security Protocols under Equational Theories. In: Díaz, J., Karhumäki, J., Lepistö, A., Sannella, D. (eds.) ICALP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3142, pp. 46–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  2. Abadi, M., Rogaway, P.: Reconciling two Views of Cryptography (The computational soundness of formal encryption). In: Watanabe, O., Hagiya, M., Ito, T., van Leeuwen, J., Mosses, P.D. (eds.) TCS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1872, p. 3. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bieber, P.: A Logic of Communication in a Hostile Environment. In: CSFW (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bryans, J.W., Koutny, M., Ryan, P.Y.A.: Modelling Opacity using Petri Nets. ENTCS 121 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bryans, J.W., Koutny, M., Ryan, P.Y.A.: Modelling Dynamic Opacity using Petri Nets with Silent Actions. In: FAST (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Bryans, J.W., Koutny, M., Mazaré, L., Ryan, P.Y.A.: Opacity Generalised to Transition Systems. CS-TR 868, University of Newcastle (2004), http://www.cs.ncl.ac.uk/research/pubs/trs/abstract.php?number=868

  7. Dolev, D., Yao, A.C.: On the Security of Public Key Protocols. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 29 (1983)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning about Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Finkel, A.: The Minimal Coverability Graph for Petri Nets. In: Rozenberg, G. (ed.) APN 1993. LNCS, vol. 674. Springer, Heidelberg (1993)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Focardi, R., Gorrieri, R.: A Taxonomy of Trace-Based Security Properties for CCS. In: CSFW (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Focardi, R., Gorrieri, R.: Classification of Security Properties: Information flow. In: Focardi, R., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) FOSAD 2000. LNCS, vol. 2171, p. 331. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Glasgow, J., Macewen, G., Panangaden, P.: A Logic for Reasoning about Security. ACM Transactions on Computer Systems 10 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Lakhnech, Y., Mazaré, L.: Probabilistic Opacity for a Passive Adversary and its Application to Chaum’s Voting Scheme. Verimag Technical Report 2005-04 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Halpern, J.Y., O’Neill, K.: Anonymity and Information Hiding in Multiagent Systems. In: CSFW (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Jacquemard, F., Rusinowitch, M., Vigneron, L.: Compiling and Verifying Security Protocols. In: Parigot, M., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2000. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 1955, pp. 131–160. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Mazaré, L.: Using Unification For Opacity Properties. In: WITS (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Moser, L.: A Logic of Knowledge and Belief for Reasoning about Security. In: CSFW (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nabialek, W., Niewiadomski, A., Penczek, W., Polórla, A., Szreter, M.: Verics 2004: A Model Checker of Real-Time and Multi-agent Systems. In: CS&P (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  19. O’Halloran, C.: A Calculus of Information Flow. In: ESORICS (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Raimondi, F., Lomuscio, A.: Verification of Multiagent Systems via Ordered Binary Decision Diagrams: an Algorithm and its Implementation. TR-04-01, King’s College (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reisig, W., Rozenberg, G. (eds.) APN 1998. LNCS, vol.1491,1492. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Ryan, P.Y.A.: Mathematical Models of Computer Security. In: Focardi, R., Gorrieri, R. (eds.) FOSAD 2000. LNCS, vol. 2171, p. 1. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  23. Schneider, S., Sidiropoulos, A.: CSP and Anonymity. In: ESORICS (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  24. van Otterloo, S., van der Hoek, W., Woolridge, M.: Model Checking a Knowledge Exchange Scenario. In: IJCAI (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Time Petri Net Analyzer (2004), http://www.laas.fr/tina/

  26. van der Hoek, W., Lomuscio, A.: A Logic for Ignorance. ENTCS 85 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2006 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bryans, J.W., Koutny, M., Mazaré, L., Ryan, P.Y.A. (2006). Opacity Generalised to Transition Systems. In: Dimitrakos, T., Martinelli, F., Ryan, P.Y.A., Schneider, S. (eds) Formal Aspects in Security and Trust. FAST 2005. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 3866. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/11679219_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/11679219_7

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-32628-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-32629-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics