Abstract
Complex system development and information integration at the conceptual layer raises the requirement to be able to declare intermodel assertions between entities in models that may, or may not, be represented in the same modelling language. This is compounded by the fact that semantically equivalent notions may have been represented with a different element, such as an attribute or class. We first investigate such occurrences in six ICOM projects and 40 models with 33 schema matchings. While equivalence and subsumption are in the overwhelming majority, this extends mainly to different types of attributes, and therewith requiring non-1:1 mappings. We present a solution that bridges these semantic gaps. To facilitate implementation, the mappings and transformations are declared in ATL. This avails of a common, and logic-based, metamodel to aid verification of the links. This is currently being implemented as proof-of-concept in the ICOM tool.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Atzeni, P., Cappellari, P., Torlone, R., Bernstein, P.A., Gianforme, G.: Model-independent schema translation. VLDB J. 17(6), 1347–1370 (2008)
Atzeni, P., Gianforme, G., Cappellari, P.: Data model descriptions and translation signatures in a multi-model framework. AMAI 63, 1–29 (2012)
Baudry, B., Ghosh, S., Fleurey, F., France, R., Le Traon, Y., Mottu, J.M.: Barriers to systematic model transformation testing. Comm. ACM 53(6), 139–143 (2010)
Grau, B.C., Parsia, B., Sirin, E.: Combining OWL ontologies using \(\varepsilon \)-connections. J. Web Sem. 4(1), 40–59 (2006)
Falbo, R.A., Guizzardi, G., Gangemi, A., Presutti, V.: Ontology patterns: clarifying concepts and terminology. In: Proceedings of OSWP 2013 (2013)
Fillottrani, P.R., Keet, C.M.: Conceptual model interoperability: a metamodel-driven approach. In: Bikakis, A., Fodor, P., Roman, D. (eds.) RuleML 2014. LNCS, vol. 8620, pp. 52–66. Springer, Heidelberg (2014)
Fillottrani, P.R., Franconi, E., Tessaris, S.: The ICOM 3.0 intelligent conceptual modelling tool and methodology. Semant. Web J. 3(3), 293–306 (2012)
Fillottrani, P.R., Keet, C.M.: A design for coordinated and logics-mediated conceptual modelling. In: Proceedings of DL 2016, (in print). CEUR-WS, pp. 22–25, Cape Town, South Africa, April 2016
Ghidini, C., Serafini, L., Tessaris, S.: Complexity of reasoning with expressive ontology mappings. In: Proceedings of FOIS 2008, FAIA, vol. 183, pp. 151–163. IOS Press (2008)
Golas, U., Ehrig, H., Hermann, F.: Formal specification of model transformations by triple graph grammars with application conditions. Elect. Comm. EASST 39, 26 (2011)
Grønmo, R., Møller-Pedersen, B., Olsen, G.K.: Comparison of three model transformation languages. In: Paige, R.F., Hartman, A., Rensink, A. (eds.) ECMDA-FA 2009. LNCS, vol. 5562, pp. 2–17. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)
Jouault, F., Allilaire, F., Bzivin, J., Kurtev, I.: ATL: a model transformation tool. Sci. Comput. Program. 72(1–2), 31–39 (2008)
Keet, C.M., Fillottrani, P.R.: An analysis and characterisation of publicly available conceptual models. In: Johannesson, P., Lee, M.L., Liddle, S.W., Opdahl, A.L., López, Ó.P. (eds.) ER 2015. LNCS, vol. 9381, pp. 585–593. Springer, Heidelberg (2015)
Keet, C.M., Fillottrani, P.R.: An ontology-driven unifying metamodel of UML class diagrams, EER and ORM2. Data Knowl. Eng. 98, 30–53 (2015)
Khan, Z.C., Keet, C.M.: An empirically-based framework for ontology modularization. Appl. Ontol. 10(3–4), 171–195 (2015)
Leather, S., Jeuring, J., Lh, A., Schuur, B.: Type-changing rewriting and semantics-preserving transformation. Sci. Comp. Prog. 112, 145–169 (2015)
Mossakowski, T., Kutz, O., Codescu, M., Lange, C.: The distributed ontology, modeling and specification language. In: Proceedings of WoMo 2013. CEUR-WS, vol. 1081, Corunna, Spain, 15 September 2013
Motik, B., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Grau, B.C.: OWL 2 web ontology language: direct semantics. W3C recommendation, W3C, 27 October 2009. http://www.w3.org/TR/owl2-direct-semantics/
Object Management Group: Meta Object Facility (MOF) 2.0 - Query/View/Transformation Specification. http://www.omg.org/spec/QVT/1.2
Zhu, N., Grundy, J., Hosking, J.: Pounamu: a metatool for multi-view visual language environment construction. In: Proceedings of VLHCC 2004, Rome, 25–29 September 2004
Acknowledgments
This work is based in part upon research supported by the National Research Foundation of South Africa (Project UID90041) and the Argentinean Ministry of Science and Technology.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Khan, Z.C., Keet, C.M., Fillottrani, P.R., Cenci, K. (2016). Experimentally Motivated Transformations for Intermodel Links Between Conceptual Models. In: Pokorný, J., Ivanović, M., Thalheim, B., Šaloun, P. (eds) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. ADBIS 2016. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9809. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44039-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44039-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-44038-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-44039-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)