Remote Hub Lab – RHL: Broadly Accessible Technologies for Education and Telehealth

1. Turan Z, Gurol A (2020) Emergency transformation in education: Stress perceptions and views of university students taking online course during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Hayef J Educ 17(2):222–242. https://doi.org/10.5152/hayef.2020.20018

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Shin M, Hickey K (2020) Needs a little TLC: examining college students’ emergency remote teaching and learning experiences during COVID-19. J Furth High Educ 45:973–986. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2020.1847261

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Sercemeli M, Kurnaz E (2020) A research on students’ perspectives to distance education and distance accounting education in the COVID-19 pandemic period. Int J Soc Sci Acad Res 4(1):40–53

   Google Scholar 

4. Lee K, Fanguy M, Lu XS, Bligh B (2021) Student learning during COVID-19: it was not as bad as we feared. Dist Educ 42(1):164–172. https://doi.org/10.1080/01587919.2020.1869529

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Atasoy R, Özden C, Kara DN (2020) Evaluation of the effectiveness of e-course practices during the covid-19 pandemic from the students’ perspective. Turk Stud 15(6):95–122. https://doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.44491

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Aristovnik A, Keržič D, Ravšelj D, Tomaževič N, Umek L (2020) Impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on life of higher education students: a global perspective. Sustainability 12(20):1–34. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12208438

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Atilgan B, et al (2021) Evaluation of the emergency distance teaching from the perspective of medical students. J Contin Med Educ 29(6):396–406. https://doi.org/10.17942/sted.837551

8. Al-Tarawneh L, Al-Nasa’h M, Awwad FA (2021) The effect of the COVID-19 pandemic among undergraduate engineering students in jordanian universities: factors impact students’ learning satisfaction. In: Innovation and new trends in engineering, science and technology education conference (IETSEC) IEEE, pp 11–77.https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/abstract/document/9440500

9. Orrange S, Patel A, Mack WJ, Cassetta J (2021) Patient satisfaction and trust in telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic: retrospective observational study. JMIR Hum Fact 8(2):e28589. https://doi.org/10.2196/28589.PMID:33822736;PMCID:PMC8103305

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Solimini R, Busardò FP, Gibelli F, Sirignano A, Ricci G (2021) Ethical and legal challenges of telemedicine in the era of the COVID-19 pandemic. Medicina 57:1314. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57121314

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Bickler PE, Feiner JR, Severinghaus JW (2005) Effects of skin pigmentation on pulse oximeter accuracy at low saturation. Anesthesiology 102:715–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Sjoding MW, Dickson RP, Iwashyna TJ, Gay SE, Valley TS (2020) Racial bias in pulse oximetry measurement. New Engl J Med 383:2477–2478

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Wong AKI, et al (2021) Analysis of discrepancies between pulse oximetry and arterial oxygen saturation measurements by race and ethnicity and association with organ dysfunction and mortality. JAMA Netw Open 4

    Google Scholar 

14. Hussein R, Wilson D (2021) Remote versus in-hand hardware laboratory in digital circuits courses. In: 2021 ASEE virtual annual conference content access (2021)

    Google Scholar 

15. Stoma bleeding and irritation: Ostomy bag leaking. Stoma Bleeding and Irritation | Ostomy Bag Leaking - UChicago Medicine. Accessed 13 Nov 2022. https://www.uchospitals.edu/conditions-services/colon-rectal-surgery/ostomy/guide-to-pouching-systems/leakage-bleeding-irritation-and-other-common-ostomy-pouch-issues

16. Scarborough K (2019) Ostomy pouch leaks. Shield HealthCare. Accessed 13 Nov 2022. http://www.shieldhealthcare.com/community/ostomylife/2019/04/05/ostomy-pouch-leaks/

17. Eyerys. How Apple's LiDAR Sensor Differs From The One On Its ‘TrueDepth’ Face ID. eyerys.com. https://www.eyerys.com/articles/how-apples-lidar-sensor-differs-one-its-truedepth-face-id. Accessed 13 Nov 2022

18. Monroy FL, Hussein R, Mamishev A (2022) Accuracy of smartphone depth cameras in stoma shape extraction for wafer fitting. In: 2022 signal processing: algorithms, architectures, arrangements, and applications (SPA). IEEE, pp 40–45

    Google Scholar 

19. Neycyanshi. Neycyanshi/InfiniTAM_ios: Real-time face/body 3D reconstruction on IOS using TrueDepth camera. GitHub. Accessed 13 Nov 2022. https://github.com/neycyanshi/InfiniTAM_ios

20. Prisacariu VA, et al (2017) Infinitam v3: a framework for large-scale 3d reconstruction with loop closure. arXiv preprint arXiv:1708.00783.

21. Nataliansyah MM et al (2022) Managing innovation: a qualitative study on the implementation of telehealth services in rural emergency departments. BMC Health Serv Res 22(1):1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Guo M, Hussein R, Orduña P (2022) RHL-Butterfly: a scalable iot-based breadboard prototype for embedded systems laboratories. In: Frontiers in education (FIE) conference

    Google Scholar 

23. Heradio R, De La Torre L, Galan D, Cabrerizo FJ, Herrera-Viedma E, Dormido S (2016) Virtual and remote labs in education: a bibliometric analysis. Comput Educ 98:14–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Glassey J, Magalhães FD (2020) Virtual labs–love them or hate them, they are likely to be used more in the future. Educ Chem Eng 33:76

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Alfred M, Neyens DM, Gramopadhye AK (2018) Comparing learning outcomes in physical and simulated learning environments. Int J Ind Ergon 68:110–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

26. Li S, Wang H, Rodriguez-Gil L, Orduña P, Hussein R (2021) FPGA meets breadboard: Integrating a virtual breadboard with real FPGA boards for remote access in digital design courses. In: International conference on remote engineering and virtual instrumentation. Springer, Cham, pp 144–151

    Google Scholar 

27. May D, Reeves B, Trudgen M, Alweshah A (2020) The remote laboratory VISIR-Introducing online laboratory equipment in electrical engineering classes. In 2020 IEEE frontiers in education conference (FIE). IEEE, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

28. Rodríguez-Gil L, García-Zubia J, Orduna P, Lopez-de-Ipiña D (2017) An open and scalable web-based interactive live-streaming architecture: The WILSP platform. IEEE Access 5:9842–9856

    Article  Google Scholar 

29. Seubert A (1929) Science laboratory equipment for junior and senior high schools. Junior-Senior High School Clear House 4(4):217–220

    Google Scholar 

30. Aramburu Mayoz C, et al (2020) FPGA remote laboratory: experience in UPNA and UNIFESP. In: International conference on remote engineering and virtual instrumentation. Springer, Cham, pp 112–127

    Google Scholar 

31. Ornstein AC (1987) The field of curriculum: what approach? what definition? High Sch J 70(4):208–216

    Google Scholar 

32. Ashby JE (2008) The effectiveness of collaborative technologies in remote lab delivery systems. In: 2008 38th annual frontiers in education conference. IEEE, pp F4E-7

    Google Scholar 

33. Gadzhanov S, Nafalski A (2010) Pedagogical effectiveness of remote laboratories for measurement and control (Doctoral dissertation, UNESCO, International Centre for Engineering Education)

    Google Scholar 

34. Atienza F, Hussein R (2022) Student perspectives on remote hardware labs and equitable access in a post-pandemic era. In 2022 frontiers in education (FIE) conference

    Google Scholar 

35. Orduña P, Rodriguez-Gil L, Garcia-Zubia J, Angulo I, Hernandez U, Azcuenaga E (2018) Increasing the value of remote laboratory federations through an open sharing platform: LabsLand. In: Online engineering & internet of things. Springer, Cham, pp 859–873

    Google Scholar 

Download references