Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Positive Material Identification (PMI) Capabilities in the Metals Secondary Industry: An Analysis of XRF and LIBS Handheld Analyzers

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Light Metals 2019

Part of the book series: The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series ((MMMS))

Abstract

Recycling is a critical part of obtaining a more circular economy . In the metals secondary industry, traditional equipment (a magnet, file, and/or grinding wheel) used to identify and sort materials at their end of life can aid in grouping metals (i.e. Al  + Mg alloys, ferrous, high temperature alloys, etc.), but they are incapable of identifying the alloy ’s elemental composition; a necessity for preventing downcycling and maximizing secondary utilization rates. Handheld analyzers that utilize X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and spectroscopy (LIBS ) technology may offer technological assistance that is helpful for achieving this level of analysis, often referred to as Positive Material Identification (PMI). This work tests the performance of these units under the challenging conditions present in yards (contaminated, unpolished, rugged scraps). These instruments, with their increasing safety settings, ruggedness, ease of point-click use and quick read times (for both XRF and LIBS ) have significant potential, especially with ability to ID metal faster than cognitive recognition. Additionally, as unit costs of these instruments continue to decrease and the range of varying types of metal entering yards continues to widen, the return on investment becomes more immediate. However, extreme fluctuations of reported elemental compositions are being seen even when measurements have been taken in the same place consecutively; indicating that in their current state, they can inform content of material but aren’t necessarily reliable for reporting accurate and precise compositional percentages.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 299.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brooks, L., G. Gaustad, A. Gesing, and T. Mortvedt. 2018. Potential for Handheld Analyzers to Address Emerging Positive Material Identification (PMI). Light Metals 2018. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Proceedings 2018, 1131–1135.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cullen, J. M., & Allwood, J. M. (2013). Mapping the Global Flow of Aluminum: From Liquid Aluminum to End-Use Goods. ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY, 47(7), 3057–3064. https://doi.org/10.1021/es304256s.

  3. Gaustad, G., Olivetti, E., & Kirchain, R. (2012). Improving aluminum recycling: A survey of sorting and impurity removal technologies. Resources, Conservation & Recycling, 58, 79–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2011.10.010.

  4. Gesing, Adam J. “Shredder Practice for Preparation of Nonmetallic Concentrates and Potential for Particle Sorting of these Concentrates.” Sensor-Based Sorting(2006): 28–30.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Gesing, Adam, and Hartmut Harbeck. “Particle sorting of light-metal alloys and expanded use of manufacturing scrap in automotive, marine, and aerospace markets.”Global symposium on recycling, waste treatment, and clean technology (REWAS). 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Gesing, A., & Wolanski, R. (2001). Recycling light metals from end-of-life vehicles. JOM, 53(11), 21.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Geyer, R., Kuczenski, B., Zink, T., & Henderson, A. (2016). Common Misconceptions about Recycling. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 20(5), 1010–1017. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12355.

  8. Peterson, Ray D. “Issues in the melting and reclamation of aluminum scrap.” JOM 47.2 (1995): 27–29.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Schlesinger, Mark E. Aluminum recycling. CRC Press, 2013.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the Golisano Institute for Sustainability at RIT and Gerdau Ameristeel for funding that helped to support this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabrielle Gaustad .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 The Minerals, Metals & Materials Society

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Brooks, L., Gaustad, G. (2019). Positive Material Identification (PMI) Capabilities in the Metals Secondary Industry: An Analysis of XRF and LIBS Handheld Analyzers. In: Chesonis, C. (eds) Light Metals 2019. The Minerals, Metals & Materials Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05864-7_170

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics