Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Intertwining Lean and Design Thinking: Software Product Development from Empathy to Shipment

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Software for People

Part of the book series: Management for Professionals ((MANAGPROF))

Abstract

A few years back, everybody in the industry seemed to be talking about how “Lean Thinking” can improve software development. Best practices emerged, books were written and Lean Thinking, associated with agile process frameworks became somewhat of a standard work culture in software development. Now that many people are actually practicing lean and agile development, they have started to wonder about something called “Design Thinking”. When we coach development teams in a large software company, we’re frequently being asked whether Design Thinking is the next big thing substituting lean software development. After having guided several teams through successful projects, our verdict is: Design Thinking is not Lean’s heir; in fact the two schools can be intertwined in many ways and complement each other very well. As we will elaborate in this case study, they share some integral core values and goals, and can therefore be applied in the same project without corrupting each other. As a proof of concept, we combined and utilized the underlying set of methods in order to explore a yet relatively unknown and unusual domain for SAP business applications: Software for professional sailors and their coaches that helps them to optimize their training experience and competitive performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, D. J. (2010). Kanban. Sequim, WA: Blue Hole Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K. (1999). Embracing change with extreme programming. Computer, 32(10), 70–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck, K., Beedle, M., Bennekum, A. V., Cockburn, A., Cunningham, W., Fowler, M., et al. (2001). Agile manifesto.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, B., & Hildenbrand, T. (2011b). Product line engineering in large-scale lean and agile software product development environments – Towards a hybrid approach to decentral control and managed reuse. Presented at the 6th international conference on availability, reliability and security, Vienna.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blau, B., Hildenbrand, T., Xu, Y., & Fassunge, M. G. (2011a). Incentives and performance in large-scale lean software development – An agent-based simulation approach. Presented at the 6th international conference on evaluation of novel approaches to software engineering (ENASE 2011), Beijing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, T. (2009). Change by design: How design thinking transforms organizations and inspires innovation. Harper Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chow, T., & Cao, D. B. (2008). A survey study of critical success factors in agile software projects. Journal of Systems and Software, 81(6), 961–971.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohn, M. (2004). User stories applied: For agile software development. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derby, E., Larsen, D., & Schwaber, K. (2006). Agile retrospectives: Making good teams great. Raleigh: Pragmatic Bookshelf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., & Ram, S. (2004). Design science in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 75–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Highsmith, J. A., & Highsmith, J. (2009). Agile project management: Creating innovative products. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hildenbrand, T., Geisser, M., Kude, T., Bruch, D., & Acker, T. (2008). Agile methodologies for distributed collaborative development of enterprise applications. International conference on complex, intelligent and software intensive systems. CISIS 2008 (pp. 540–545), Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. (2001). The art of innovation. London: Profile Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, T. (2008). The ten faces of innovation. London: Profile Books Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kniberg, H. (2007). Scrum and XP from the Trenches. InfoQ Enterprise Software Development Series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larman, C., & Vodde, B. (2008). Scaling lean & agile development: Thinking and organizational tools for large-scale Scrum. Boston: Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larman, C., & Vodde, B. (2010). Practices for scaling lean and agile development: Large, multisite, and offshore product development with large-scale scrum. Addison-Wesley Professional. Upper Saddle River, NJ: USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Leffingwell, D. (2011). Agile Software Requirements: Lean Requirements Practices for Teams, Programs, and the Enterprise. Addison-Wesley Professional. Upper Saddle River, NJ: USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. C. (2008). Clean code: A handbook of agile software craftsmanship. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. L. (2009). The design of business: Why design thinking is the next competitive advantage. Harvard Business School Press. Boston: USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (2011). Design thinking: Understand – improve – apply. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Patton, J. (2008). The new backlog. AgileProductDesign.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pichler, R. (2010). Agile product management with scrum: Creating products that customers love. Amsterdam: Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppendieck, M. (2002). Principles of lean thinking. OOPSLA Onward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poppendieck, M., & Poppendieck, T. (2003). Lean software development: An agile toolkit. Upper Saddle River: Addison-Wesley Professional.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinertsen, D. G. (1997). Managing the design factory: A product developer’s toolkit. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinertsen, D. G. (2009). The principles of product development flow: Second generation lean product development. Redondo Beach, CA: Celeritas Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ries E. (2011). The lean startup: How constant innovation creates radically successful businesses. Crown Publishing Group. London: UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rother, M., & MyiLibrary. (2010). Toyota kata: managing people for improvement, adaptiveness, and superior results. New York: McGraw Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sailing Team Germany Uses. (2011). SAP Sail Better. youtube.com.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnitter, J., & Mackert, O. (2011). Large-scale agile software development at SAP AG. Evaluation of Novel Approaches to Software Engineering, 230, 209–220. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-23391-3_15

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwaber, K., et al. (1995). Scrum development process. In OOPSLA business object design and implementation workshop (Vol. 27, pp. 10–19). Austin: TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. G., & Reinertsen, D. G. (1992). Shortening the product development cycle. Research Technology Management, 35(3), 44–49.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, J., & Schwaber, J. (2011). Scrum Guide, http://www.Scrum.org/scrumguides/ (cit. 2011).

  • Van de Ven, A. H., & Drazin, R. (1985). The concept of fit in contingency theory. Research in Organizational Behavior, 7(3), 333–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., Jones, D. T. & Daniel, R. (1990). The machine that changed the world. Free Press. New York: USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Womack, J. P., & Jones, D. T. (2003). Lean thinking: Banish waste and create wealth in your corporation. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2008). Case study research: Design and methods (Vol. 4). Thousand Oaks: Sage publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. K. (2011). Applications of case study research (Vol. 34). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We have to thank: Stefan Lacher, Jochen Guertler and his Innovation Center team, as well as Marcus Baur as main representative for Sailing Team Germany.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tobias Hildenbrand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hildenbrand, T., Meyer, J. (2012). Intertwining Lean and Design Thinking: Software Product Development from Empathy to Shipment. In: Maedche, A., Botzenhardt, A., Neer, L. (eds) Software for People. Management for Professionals. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-31371-4_13

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics