Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Dominance Signals in Debates

  • Conference paper
Human Behavior Understanding (HBU 2010)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNIP,volume 6219))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

The paper analyzes the signals of dominance in different modalities displayed during TV talk shows and debates. Dominance is defined, according to a model in terms of goals and beliefs, as a person’s having more power than others. A scheme is presented for the annotation of signals of dominance in political debates: based on the analysis of videotaped data, a typology is proposed of strategies to convey dominance, and the corresponding signals are overviewed. Strategies range from the aggressive ones of imperiousness, judgement, invasion, norm violation and defiance, to the more subtle touchiness and victimhood, ending up with haughtiness, irony and ridicule, easiness, carelessness and assertiveness.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ridgeway, C.L.: Gender, status and leadership. Journal of Social Issues 57, 637–655 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tajfel, H.: Interindividual behaviour and intergroup behaviour. In: Tajfel, H. (ed.) Differentation between social groups: Studies in the social psychology of intergroup relations, pp. 27–60. Academic Press, London (1978)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tajfel, H., Turner, J.C.: The social identity theory of intergroup behaviour. In: Worchel, S., Austin, W.G. (eds.) Psychology of intergroup behaviour. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F.: Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior: Basic concepts and nonverbal behavior. In: Ellyson, S.L., Dovidio, J.F. (eds.) Power, dominance, and nonverbal behavior, pp. 1–27. Springer, New York (1985)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Aries, E.J., Gold, C., Weigel, R.H.: Dispositional and situational influences on dominance behavior in small groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 44, 779–786 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Burgoon, J.K., Dunbar, N.E.: An interactionist perspective on dominance submission: Interpersonal dominance as a dynamic, situationally contingent social skill. Communication Monographs 67, 96–121 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunbar, N.E., Burgoon, J.K.: Perceptions of power and interactional dominance in interpersonal relationships. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships 22, 231–257 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Prato, E., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., Malle, B.F.: Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 67, 741–763 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Dunbar, N.E., Bippus, A.M., Young, S.L.: Interpersonal Dominance in Relational Conflict: a view from Dyadic Power Theory. Interpersona 2(1), 1–33 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ridgeway, C.L.: Nonverbal Behavior, Dominance, and the Basis of Status in Task Groups. American Sociological Review 52, 683–694 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Argyle, M.: Bodily Communication, 2nd edn. Methuen, New York (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Keating, C.F., Bai, D.L.: Children’s attributes of social dominance from facial cues. Child Development 57, 1269–1276 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Tracy, J.L., Robins, R.W.: The prototypical pride expression: Development of a nonverbal behavioral coding system. Emotion 7, 789–801 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Cashdan, E.: Smiles, speech, and body posture: How women and men display sociometric status and power. Journal of Nonverbal Behavior 22, 209–228 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Gregory, S.W., Webster, S.: A nonverbal signal in voices of interview partners effectively predicts communication accommodation and social status perceptions. Journal of Personality & Social Psychology 70, 1231–1240 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Jayagopi, D.B., Hung, H., Yeo, C., Gatica-Perez, D.: Modeling dominance in group conversations using nonverbal activity cues. Trans. Audio, Speech and Lang. Proc. 17(3) (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Stein, R.T., Heller, T.: An empirical analysis of the correlations between leadership status and participation rate reported in literature. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 37, 1993–2003 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Brooke, M.E., Ng, S.H.: Language and social influence in small conversation groups. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 5, 201–210 (1986)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ng, S.H., Bradac, J.J.: X Power in language. Sage Publication, N.P (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Conte, R., Castelfranchi, C.: Cognitive and social action. University College of London Press, London (1995)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Castelfranchi, C.: Micro-Macro Constitution of Power, ProtoSociology. International Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 18-19, 208-265 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Poggi, I.: Mind, hands, face and body. In: A goal and belief view of multimodal communication. Weidler, Berlin (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Giglioli, P., Cavicchioli, S., Fele, G.: Rituali di degradazione. Anatomia del processo Cusani, Bologna, il Mulino (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Garfinkel, H.: Studies in ethnometodology. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Goffman, E.: Modelli di interazione, Il Mulino, Bologna (1967)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Castelfranchi, C.: Che figura. Emozioni e immagine sociale, Bologna, Il Mulino (1988)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Poggi, I.: Irony, humour ad ridicule. Power, image and judicial rhetoric in an Italian political trial. In: Vion, R. (ed.) La corporalité du langage. Multimodalitè, discourse, écriture. Hommage à Claire Maury-Rouan. Publications de L’Université de Provence, Aix-en-Provence (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  28. Kelly, J.A., Kern, J.M., Kirkley, B.G., Patterson, J.N., Keane, T.M.: Reactions to assertive versus unassertive behavior: Differential effects of males and female and implications for assertiveness training. Behavior Therapy 11, 670–682 (1980)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2010 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Poggi, I., D’Errico, F. (2010). Dominance Signals in Debates. In: Salah, A.A., Gevers, T., Sebe, N., Vinciarelli, A. (eds) Human Behavior Understanding. HBU 2010. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 6219. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14715-9_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14715-9_16

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-14714-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-14715-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics