Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Epistemic Strategies and Games on Concurrent Processes

  • Conference paper
SOFSEM 2009: Theory and Practice of Computer Science (SOFSEM 2009)

Abstract

We develop a game semantics for process algebra with two interacting agents. The purpose of our semantics is to make manifest the role of knowledge and information flow in the interactions between agents and to control the information available to interacting agents. We define games and strategies on process algebras, so that two independent agents interacting according to their strategies determine the execution of the process, replacing the traditional scheduler. We show that different restrictions on strategies represent different amounts of information being available to a scheduler. We also show that a certain class of strategies corresponds to the syntactic schedulers of Chatzikokolakis and Palamidessi, which were developed to overcome problems with traditional schedulers modelling interaction. The restrictions on these strategies have an explicit epistemic flavour.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y.: Knowledge and common knowledge in a distributed environment. In: Proc. of Principles of Distributed Computing, pp. 50–61 (1984)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Fagin, R., Halpern, J.Y., Moses, Y., Vardi, M.Y.: Reasoning About Knowledge. MIT Press, Cambridge (1995)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Schneider, S., Sidiropoulos, A.: CSP and anonymity. In: Martella, G., Kurth, H., Montolivo, E., Bertino, E. (eds.) ESORICS 1996. LNCS, vol. 1146, pp. 198–218. Springer, Heidelberg (1996)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bhargava, M., Palamidessi, C.: Probabilistic anonymity. In: Abadi, M., de Alfaro, L. (eds.) CONCUR 2005. LNCS, vol. 3653, pp. 171–185. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  5. Chatzikokolakis, K., Palamidessi, C.: Making random choices invisible to the scheduler. In: Caires, L., Vasconcelos, V.T. (eds.) CONCUR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4703, pp. 42–58. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Abramsky, S., Jagadeesan, R.: Games and full completeness for multiplicative linear logic. J. Symbolic Logic 59(2), 543–574 (1994)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Hyland, J.M.E., Ong, C.H.L.: On full abstraction for PCF. Information and Computation 163, 285–408 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Abramsky, S., Jagadeesan, R., Malacaria, P.: Full abstraction for PCF. Information and Computation 163, 409–470 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Danos, V., Harmer, R.: The anatomy of innocence. In: Fribourg, L. (ed.) CSL 2001 and EACSL 2001. LNCS, vol. 2142, pp. 188–202. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  10. Borgstrom, J., Kramer, S., Nestmann, U.: Calculus of cryptographic communication. In: Proceedings of FCS-ARSPA 2006, pp. 91–112 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Deschesne, F., Mousavi, M., Orzan, S.: Operational and epistemic approaches to protocol analysis: Bridging the gap. In: Dershowitz, N., Voronkov, A. (eds.) LPAR 2007. LNCS, vol. 4790, pp. 226–241. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  12. Shannon, C.: A mathematical theory of communication. Bell System Technical Journal 656, 379–423, 623–656 (1948)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Chatzikokolakis, K., Palamidessi, C., Panangaden, P.: Anonymity protocols as noisy channels. In: Montanari, U., Sannella, D., Bruni, R. (eds.) TGC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4661, pp. 281–300. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Krasucki, P., Ndjatou, G., Parikh, R.: Probabilistic knowledge and probabilistic common knowledge. In: ISMIS 1990, pp. 1–8. North-Holland, Amsterdam (1990)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2009 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Chatzikokolakis, K., Knight, S., Panangaden, P. (2009). Epistemic Strategies and Games on Concurrent Processes. In: Nielsen, M., Kučera, A., Miltersen, P.B., Palamidessi, C., Tůma, P., Valencia, F. (eds) SOFSEM 2009: Theory and Practice of Computer Science. SOFSEM 2009. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 5404. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-95891-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-95891-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-540-95890-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-540-95891-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics