Non-negative Sparse Modeling of Textures

1. Efros, A.A., Leung, T.K.: Texture synthesis by non-parametric sampling. In: ICCV ’99: Proceedings of the International Conference on Computer Vision, vol. 2, p. 1033. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (1999)

   Google Scholar 

2. Wei, L.-Y., Levoy, M.: Fast texture synthesis using tree-structured vector quantization. In: SIGGRAPH ’00: Proceedings of the 27th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pp. 479–488. ACM Press, New York (2000), doi:10.1145/344779.345009

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

3. Lefebvre, S., Hoppe, H.: Parallel controllable texture synthesis. ACM Trans. Graph. 24(3), 777–786 (2005), doi:10.1145/1073204.1073261

   Article  Google Scholar 

4. Julesz, B.: Visual pattern discrimination. IRE Trans. Inform. Theory 8(2), 84–92 (1962)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Zhu, S.C., Wu, Y., Mumford, D.: Filters, random fields and maximum entropy (FRAME): Towards a unified theory for texture modeling. Int. J. Comput. Vision 27(2), 107–126 (1998)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Heeger, D.J., Bergen, J.R.: Pyramid-Based texture analysis/synthesis. In: Cook, R. (ed.) SIGGRAPH 95 Conference Proceedings, Aug. 1995. Annual Conference Series, pp. 229–238. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1995)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

7. Perlin, K.: An image synthesizer. In: SIGGRAPH ’85: Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques, pp. 287–296. ACM Press, New York (1985), doi:10.1145/325334.325247

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

8. Portilla, J., Simoncelli, E.P.: A parametric texture model based on joint statistics of complex wavelet coefficients. Int. J. Comput. Vision 40(1), 49–70 (2000)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

9. Attneave, F.: Some informational aspects of visual perception. Psychological Review 61, 183–193 (1954)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Barlow, H.B.: Possible principles underlying the transformation of sensory messages. In: Rosenblith, W.A. (ed.) Sensory Communication, pp. 217–234. MIT Press, Cambridge (1961)

    Google Scholar 

11. Mallat, S.: A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing. Academic Press, San Diego (1998)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

12. Candès, E., Donoho, D.: New tight frames of curvelets and optimal representations of objects with piecewise \(\text{C}^2\) singularities. Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 57(2), 219–266 (2004)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

13. Le Pennec, E., Mallat, S.: Bandelet Image Approximation and Compression. SIAM Multiscale Modeling and Simulation 4(3), 992–1039 (2005)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

14. Olshausen, B.A., Field, D.J.: Emergence of simple-cell receptive-field properties by learning a sparse code for natural images. Nature 381(6583), 607–609 (1996)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Aharon, M., Elad, M., Bruckstein, A.: The k-svd: An algorithm for designing of overcomplete dictionaries for sparse representation. IEEE Trans. On Signal Processing (to appear) (2006)

    Google Scholar 

16. Tropp, J.A., et al.: Designing structured tight frames via an alternating projection method. IEEE Trans. on Information Theory 51(1), 188–209 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

17. Chen, Y.-W., et al.: Selection of ICA Features for Texture Classification. In: Wang, J., Liao, X.-F., Yi, Z. (eds.) ISNN 2005. LNCS, vol. 3497, pp. 262–267. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)

    Google Scholar 

18. Skretting, K., Husoy, J.: Texture classification using sparse frame based representations. EURASIP Journal on Applied Signal Processing, to appear (2006)

    Google Scholar 

19. Manduchi, R., Portilla, J.: Independent component analysis of textures. In: ICCV, pp. 1054–1060 (1999)

    Google Scholar 

20. Lee, D.D., Seung, H.S.: Learning the parts of objects by non-negative matrix factorization. Nature 401, 788–791 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Donoho, D., Stodden, V.: When does non-negative matrix factorization give a correct decomposition into parts? In: Thrun, S., Saul, L., Schölkopf, B. (eds.) Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 16, MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)

    Google Scholar 

22. Lee, D.D., Seung, H.S.: Algorithms for non-negative matrix factorization. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 13, MIT Press, Cambridge (2001)

    Google Scholar 

23. Hoyer, P.O.: Non-negative matrix factorization with sparseness constraints. Journal of Machine Learning Research 5, 1457–1469 (2004)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

24. Bertalmio, M., et al.: Image inpainting. In: Siggraph 2000, pp. 417–424 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

25. Fadili, M.J., Starck, J.-L.: Em algorithm for sparse representation-based image inpainting. In: IEEE International Conference on Image Processing, vol. II, pp. 61–63. IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos (2005)

    Google Scholar 

26. Grimes, D.B., Rao, R.P.N.: Bilinear sparse coding for invariant vision. Neural Computation 17(1), 47–73 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references