Educational Data Mining and Learning Analytics

• Aleven, V., Mclaren, B., Roll, I., & Koedinger, K. (2006). Toward meta-cognitive tutoring: A model of help seeking with a cognitive tutor. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 16(2), 101–128.

  Google Scholar 

• Amershi, S., & Conati, C. (2009). Combining unsupervised and supervised classification to build user models for exploratory learning environments. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 18–71.

  Google Scholar 

• Arroyo, I., & Woolf, B. (2005). Inferring learning and attitudes from a Bayesian Network of log file data. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 33–40).

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R., Corbett. A. T., Koedinger, K., & Wagner, A. Z. (2004). Off-task behavior in the cognitive tutor classroom: When students game the system. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 383–390).

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R., de Carvalho, A., Raspat, J., Aleven, V., Corbett, A., & Koedinger, K. (2009). Educational software features that encourage and discourage “gaming the system”. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 475–482).

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R., & Gowda, S. (2010). An analysis of the differences in the frequency of students’ disengagement in urban, rural, and suburban high schools. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 11–20).

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R., Gowda, S. M., & Corbett, A. T. (2011a). Towards predicting future transfer of learning. In G. Biswas, S. Bull, J. Kay, & A. Mitrovic (Eds.), Artificial intelligence in education: Vol. 6738. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 23–30). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R., Gowda, S. M., & Corbett, A. T. (2011b). Automatically detecting a student’s preparation for future learning: Help use is key. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 179–188).

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R., Kalka, J., Aleven, V., Rossi, L., Gowda, S., Wagner, A., et al. (2012). Towards sensor-free affect detection in cognitive tutor algebra. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 126–133).

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R., Walonoski, J., Heffernan, N., Roll, I., Corbett, A., & Koedinger, K. (2008). Why students engage in “gaming the system” behavior in interactive learning environments. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 19(2), 185–224.

  Google Scholar 

• Baker, R., & Yacef, K. (2009). The state of educational data mining in 2009: A review and future visions. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 1(1), 3–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Bakharia, A., & Dawson, S. (2011). SNAPP: A bird’s-eye view of temporal participant interaction. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 168–173).

  Google Scholar 

• Barnes, T. (2005). The q-matrix method: Mining student response data for knowledge. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Artificial Intelligence 2005 Educational Data Mining Workshop (pp. 39–46).

  Google Scholar 

• Barnes, T., Bitzer, D., & Vouk, M. (2005). Experimental analysis of the q-matrix method in knowledge discovery. In M.-S. Hacid, N. Murray, Z. Raś, & S. Tsumoto (Eds.), Foundations of intelligent systems: Vol. 3488. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 603–611). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Beal, C. R., Qu, L., & Lee, H. (2006). Classifying learner engagement through integration of multiple data sources. In: Proceedings of the 21st National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 151–156).

  Google Scholar 

• Beheshti, B., & Desmarais, M. (2012). Improving matrix factorization techniques of student test data with partial order constraints. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Conference on User Modeling, Adaptation, and Personalization (pp. 346–350).

  Google Scholar 

• Benjamini, Y., & Hochberg, Y. (1995). Controlling the false discovery rate: A practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 57(1), 289–300.

  Google Scholar 

• Ben-Naim, D., Bain, M., & Marcus, N. (2009). A user-driven and data-driven approach for supporting teachers in reflection and adaptation of adaptive tutorials. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 21–30).

  Google Scholar 

• Bouchet, F., Azevedo, R., Kinnebrew, J., & Biswas, G. (2012). Identifying students’ characteristic learning behaviors in an intelligent tutoring system fostering self-regulated learning. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 65–72).

  Google Scholar 

• Brin, S., Motwani, R., Ullman, J., & Tsur, S. (1997). Dynamic itemset counting and implication rules for market basket data. In: Proceedings of the 1997 ACM International Conference on Management of Data (pp. 255–264).

  Google Scholar 

• Cen, H., Koedinger, K., & Junker, B. (2006). Learning factors analysis—A general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In M. Ikeda, K. Ashley, & T.-W. Chan (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Vol. 4053. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 164–175). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Cen, H., Koedinger, K., & Junker, B. (2007). Is over practice necessary?—Improving learning efficiency with the cognitive tutor through educational data mining. In: Proceedings of 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 511–518).

  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20(1), 37–46.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Corbett, A., & Anderson, J. (1995). Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 4(4), 253–278.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• d’Aquin, M., & Jay, N. (2013). Interpreting data mining results with linked data for learning analytics: Motivation, case study and directions. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 155–164).

  Google Scholar 

• D’Mello, S., Craig, S., Witherspoon, A., Mcdaniel, B., & Graesser, A. (2008). Automatic detection of learner’s affect from conversational cues. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 18(1–2), 45–80.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• D’Mello, S., Olney, A., & Person, N. (2010). Mining collaborative patterns in tutorial dialogues. Journal of Educational Data Mining, 2(1), 1–37.

  Google Scholar 

• Davis, J., & Goadrich, M. (2006). The relationship between precision-recall and ROC curves. In: Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Machine Learning (pp. 233–240).

  Google Scholar 

• Dawson, S. (2008). A study of the relationship between student social networks and sense of community. Educational Technology and Society, 11(3), 224–238.

  Google Scholar 

• Dekker, G., Pechenizkiy, M., & Vleeshouwers, J. (2009). Predicting students drop out: A case study. In: Proceedings of 2nd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 41–50).

  Google Scholar 

• Desmarais, M. (2011). Conditions for effectively deriving a q-matrix from data with non-negative matrix factorization. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 41–50).

  Google Scholar 

• Desmarais, M., Beheshti, B., & Naceur, R. (2012). Item to skills mapping: Deriving a conjunctive q-matrix from data. In S. A. Cerri, W. J. Clancey, G. Papadourakis, & K.-K. Panourgia (Eds.), Intelligent tutoring systems: Vol. 7315. Lecture notes in computer science (pp. 454–463). Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Fancsali, S. (2012). Variable construction and causal discovery for cognitive tutor log data: Initial results. In: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 238–239).

  Google Scholar 

• Feng, M., & Heffernan, N. (2007). Towards live informing and automatic analyzing of student learning: Reporting in the assistment system. Journal of Interactive Learning Research, 18(2), 207–230.

  Google Scholar 

• Feng, M., Heffernan, N., & Koedinger, K. (2009). Addressing the assessment challenge with an online system that tutors as it assesses. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 19(3), 243–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Goldin, I., Koedinger, K. R., & Aleven, V. (2012). Learner differences in hint processing. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 73–80).

  Google Scholar 

• Gong, Y., Beck, J. E., & Heffernan, N. T. (2011). How to construct more accurate student models: Comparing and optimizing knowledge tracing and performance factor analysis. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 21(1), 27–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Hanley, A., & McNeil, B. (1982). The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology, 143(1), 29–36.

  Google Scholar 

• Kaufman, L., & Rousseeuw, P. J. (1990). Finding groups in data: An introduction to cluster analysis. New York: Wiley.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Kay, J., Maisonneuve, N., Yacef, K., & Zaïane, O. (2006). Mining patterns of events in students’ teamwork data. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Educational Data Mining at the 8th International Conference on Intelligent Tutoring Systems (pp. 45–52).

  Google Scholar 

• Kinnebrew, J., & Biswas, G. (2012). Identifying learning behaviors by contextualizing differential sequence mining with action features and performance evolution. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 57–64).

  Google Scholar 

• Kline, P. (1993). An easy guide to factor analysis. London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Koedinger, K., McLaughlin, E., & Stamper, J. (2012). Automated student model improvement. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 17–24).

  Google Scholar 

• Lin, J., Keogh, E., Lonardi, S., & Patel, P. (2002). Finding motifs in time series. In: Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Temporal Data Mining (pp. 53–68).

  Google Scholar 

• Martin, J., & VanLehn, K. (1995). Student assessment using Bayesian nets. International Journal of Human Computer Studies, 42(6), 575–592.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Martinez, R., Yacef, K., Kay, J., Kharrufa, A., & Al-Qaraghuli, A. (2011). Analysing frequent sequential patterns of collaborative learning activity around an interactive tabletop. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 111–120).

  Google Scholar 

• Merceron, A., & Yacef, K. (2005). Educational data mining: A case study. In: Proceedings of the 2005 Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education: Supporting Learning Through Socially Informed Technology (pp. 467–474).

  Google Scholar 

• Merceron, A., & Yacef, K. (2008). Interestingness measures for association rules in educational data. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 57–66).

  Google Scholar 

• Minaei-Bidgoli, B., Kashy, D., Kortmeyer, G., & Punch, W. (2003). Predicting student performance: An application of data mining methods with an educational web-based system. In: Frontiers in Education, 2003. FIE 2003 33rd Annual (pp. T2A 13–18). (http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/login.jsp?tp=&arnumber=1263284&url=http%3A%2F%2Fieeexplore.ieee.org%2Fiel5%2F8925%2F28250%2F01263284.pdf%3Farnumber%3D1263284#).

  Google Scholar 

• Pardos, Z., Baker, R., San Pedro, M., Gowda, S., & Gowda, S. (2013). Affective states and state tests: Investigating how affect throughout the school year predicts end of year learning outcomes. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 117–124).

  Google Scholar 

• Pardos, Z. A., Gowda, S. M., Baker, R., & Heffernan, N. T. (2012). The sum is greater than the parts: Ensembling models of student knowledge in educational software. ACM SIGKDD Explorations Newsletter, 13(2), 37–44.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pavlik, P., Cen, H., & Koedinger, K. R. (2009) Performance factors analysis—A new alternative to knowledge tracing. In: Proceedings of the 14th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 531–538).

  Google Scholar 

• Perera, D., Kay, J., Koprinska, I., Yacef, K., & Zaïane, O. R. (2009). Clustering and sequential pattern mining of online collaborative learning data. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 21(6), 759–772.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rai, D., & Beck, J. (2011). Exploring user data from a game-like math tutor: A case study in causal modeling. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 307–313).

  Google Scholar 

• Rau, A., & Scheines, R. (2012). Searching for variables and models to investigate mediators of learning from multiple representations. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 110–117).

  Google Scholar 

• Roll, I., Aleven, V., McLaren, B. M., & Koedinger, K. R. (2007). Can help seeking be tutored? Searching for the secret sauce of metacognitive tutoring. In: Proceedings of the 13th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education, Marina del Rey, CA (pp. 203–210).

  Google Scholar 

• Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2007). Educational data mining: A survey from 1995 to 2005. Expert Systems with Applications, 33(1), 135–146.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Romero, C., & Ventura, S. (2010). Educational data mining: A review of the state of the art. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics Part C: Applications and Reviews, 40(6), 601–618.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Rus, V., Moldovan, C., Graesser, A., & Niraula, N. (2012). Automated discovery of speech act categories in educational games. In: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 25–32).

  Google Scholar 

• San Pedro, M., Baker, R., Bowers, A., & Heffernan, N. (2013). Predicting college enrollment from student interaction with an intelligent tutoring system in middle school. In Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 177–184).

  Google Scholar 

• Sao Pedro, M., Baker, R., Montalvo, O., Nakama, A., & Gobert, J. D. (2010). Using text replay tagging to produce detectors of systematic experimentation behavior patterns. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 181–190).

  Google Scholar 

• Scheines, R., Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., Meek, C., & Richardson, T. (1998). The TETRAD project: Constraint based aids to causal model specification. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 33(1), 65–117.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Scheuer, O., & McLaren, B. M. (2011). Educational data mining. The encyclopedia of the sciences of learning. New York: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Schreurs, B., Teplovs, C., Ferguson, R., De Laat, M., & Buckingham Shum, S. (2013). Visualizing social learning ties by type and topic: Rationale and concept demonstrator. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 33–37).

  Google Scholar 

• Shanabrook, D. H., Cooper, D. G., Woolf, B. P., & Arroyo, I. (2010). Identifying high-level student behavior using sequence-based motif discovery. In: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 191–200).

  Google Scholar 

• Shute, V. J. (1995). SMART: Student modeling approach for responsive tutoring. User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, 5(1), 1–44.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Siemens, G., & Baker, R. (2012). Learning analytics and educational data mining: Towards communication and collaboration. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 252–254).

  Google Scholar 

• Spirtes, P., Glymour, C., & Scheines, R. (2000). Causation, prediction, and search. New York: MIT Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Srikant, R., & Agrawal, R. (1996). Mining sequential patterns: Generalizations and performance improvements. Heidelberg, Germany: Springer.

  Google Scholar 

• Storey, J. D. (2003). The positive false discovery rate: A Bayesian interpretation and the q-value. Annals of Statistics, 31(6), 2013–2035.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Suthers, D., & Rosen, D. (2011). A unified framework for multi-level analysis of distributed learning. In: Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Learning Analytics and Knowledge (pp. 64–74).

  Google Scholar 

• Tatsuoka, K. (1995). Architecture of knowledge structures and cognitive diagnosis: A statistical pattern recognition and classification approach. In P. Nichols, S. Chipman, & R. Brennan (Eds.), Cognitively diagnostic assessment (pp. 327–359). London: Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Thai-Nghe, N., Horvath, T., & Schmidt-Thieme, L. (2011). Context-Aware factorization for personalized student’s task recommendation. In: Proceedings of the International Workshop on Personalization Approaches in Learning Environments (pp. 13–18).

  Google Scholar 

• Vuong, A., Nixon, T., & Towle, B. (2011). A method for finding prerequisites within a curriculum. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Data Mining (pp. 211–216).

  Google Scholar 

Download references