Abstract
We consider a voting setting where candidates have preferences about the outcome of the election and are free to join or leave the election. The corresponding candidacy game, where candidates choose strategically to participate or not, has been studied in very few papers, mainly by Dutta et al. [5,6], who showed that no non-dictatorial voting procedure satisfying unanimity is candidacy-strategyproof, or equivalently, is such that the joint action where all candidates enter the election is always a pure strategy Nash equilibrium. They also showed that for voting trees, there are candidacy games with no pure strategy equilibria. However, no results were known about other voting rules. Here we prove several such results. Some are positive (a pure strategy Nash equilibrium is guaranteed for Copeland and the uncovered set, whichever is the number of candidates, and for all Condorcet-consistent rules, for 4 candidates). Some are negative, namely for plurality and maximin.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aumann, R.: Acceptable points in general cooperative n-person games. In: Contributions to the Theory of Games IV. Annals of Mathematics Study, vol. 40, pp. 287–324 (1959)
Bartholdi, J., Tovey, C., Trick, M.: How hard is it to control an election? Social Choice and Welfare 16(8-9), 27–40 (1992)
Chevaleyre, Y., Lang, J., Maudet, N., Monnot, J., Xia, L.: New candidates welcome! possible winners with respect to the addition of new candidates. Mathematical Social Sciences 64(1), 74–88 (2012)
Debord, B.: Caractérisation des matrices de préférences nettes et méthodes d’agrégation associées. Mathematiques et Sciences Humaines 97, 5–17 (1987)
Dutta, B., Breton, M.L., Jackson, M.O.: Strategic candidacy and voting procedures. Econometrica 69, 1013–1037 (2001)
Dutta, B., Breton, M.L., Jackson, M.O.: Voting by successive elimination and strategic candidacy in committees. Journal of Economic Theory 103, 190–218 (2002)
Ehlers, L., Weymark, J.A.: Candidate stability and nonbinary social choice. Economic Theory 22(2), 233–243 (2003)
Elkind, E., Faliszewski, P., Slinko, A.M.: Cloning in elections: Finding the possible winners. J. Artif. Intell. Res (JAIR) 42, 529–573 (2011)
Eraslan, H., McLennan, A.: Strategic candidacy for multivalued voting procedures. Journal of Economic Theory 117(1), 29–54 (2004)
Faliszewski, P., Hemaspaandra, E., Hemaspaandra, L.: Multimode control attacks on elections. JAIR 40, 305–351 (2011)
Hemaspaandra, E., Hemaspaandra, L., Rothe, J.: Anyone but him: The complexity of precluding an alternative. Artificial Intelligence 171(5-6), 255–285 (2007)
Lu, T., Boutilier, C.: The unavailable candidate model: a decision-theoretic view of social choice. In: ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce 2010, pp. 263–274 (2010)
Nash, J.: Non-cooperative games. Annals of Mathematics 54(2), 286–295 (1951)
Rodriguez-Alvarez, C.: Candidate stability and probabilistic voting procedures. Economic Theory 27(3), 657–677 (2006)
Rodriguez-Alvarez, C.: Candidate stability and voting correspondences. Social Choice and Welfare 27(3), 545–570 (2006)
Saari, D.: A dictionary of voting paradoxes. Journal of Economic Theory 48 (1989)
Saari, D.: Election results and a partial ordering for positional ordering. In: Schofield, N.J. (ed.) Collective Decision-Making: Social Choice and Political Economy, pp. 93–110. Kluwer (1996)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Lang, J., Maudet, N., Polukarov, M. (2013). New Results on Equilibria in Strategic Candidacy. In: Vöcking, B. (eds) Algorithmic Game Theory. SAGT 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8146. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41392-6_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41392-6_2
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41391-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41392-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)