Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Segmentation Quality Refinement in Large-Scale Medical Image Dataset with Crowd-Sourced Annotations

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
New Trends in Database and Information Systems (ADBIS 2021)

Abstract

Deployment of different techniques of deep learning including Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) in image classification systems has accomplished outstanding results. However, the advantages and potential impact of such a system can be completely negated if it does not reach a target accuracy. To achieve high classification accuracy with low variance in medical image classification system, there is needed the large size of the training data set with suitable quality score. This paper presents a study on the use of various consistency checking methods to refine the quality of annotations. It is assumed that tagging was done by volunteers (crowd-sourcing model). The aim of this work was to evaluate the fitness of this approach in the medical field and the usefulness of our innovative web tool, called MedTagger, designed to facilitate large-scale annotation of magnetic resonance (MR) images, as well as the accuracy of crowd-source assessment using this tool, comparing to expert classification. We present the methodology followed to annotate the collection of kidney MR scans. All of the 156 images were acquired from the Medical University of Gdansk. Two groups of students (with and without medical educational background) and three nephrologists were engaged. This research supports the thesis that some types of MR image annotations provided by naive individuals are comparable to expert annotation, but this process could be shortened in time. Furthermore, it is more cost-effective in the simultaneous preservation of image analysis accuracy. With pixel-wise majority voting, it was possible to create crowd-sourced organ segmentations that match the quality of those created by individual medical experts (mAP up to 94% ±3.9%).

https://cvlab.eti.pg.gda.pl/.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 59.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://www.kaggle.com/competitions.

  2. 2.

    https://www.miccai2021.org/en/miccai2021-challenges.html.

  3. 3.

    http://medicaldecathlon.com/.

  4. 4.

    http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/projects/geos.

  5. 5.

    https://www.slicer.org.

  6. 6.

    https://imagej.net/Fiji.

  7. 7.

    https://www.mturk.com/.

  8. 8.

    https://supervise.ly/.

  9. 9.

    https://developer.nvidia.com/clara.

  10. 10.

    https://kask.eti.pg.gda.pl/medtagger.

References

  1. Barth, R., IJsselmuiden, J., Hemming, J., Van Henten, E.: Synthetic bootstrapping of convolutional neural networks for semantic plant part segmentation. Comput. Electron. Agric. 161, 291–304 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2017.11.040. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168169917307664. BigData and DSS in Agriculture

  2. Brzeski, A., Grinholc, K., Nowodworski, K., Przybyłek, A.: Evaluating performance and accuracy improvements for attention-OCR. In: Saeed, K., Chaki, R., Janev, V. (eds.) CISIM 2019. LNCS, vol. 11703, pp. 3–11. Springer, Cham (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28957-7_1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Cabezas, F., Carlier, A., Charvillat, V., Salvador, A., Giro-I-Nieto, X.: Quality control in crowdsourced object segmentation. In: Proceedings - International Conference on Image Processing, ICIP 2015-December(May), pp. 4243–4247 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIP.2015.7351606

  4. Cocos, A., Masino, A., Qian, T., Pavlick, E., Callison-Burch, C.: Effectively crowdsourcing radiology report annotations. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Health Text Mining and Information Analysis, pp. 109–114. Association for Computational Linguistics, Lisbon, September 2015. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/W15-2614

  5. Ester, M., Kriegel, H.P., Sander, J., Xu, X.: A density-based algorithm for discovering clusters in large spatial databases with noise. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD 1996, pp. 226–231. AAAI Press (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Frid-Adar, M., Diamant, I., Klang, E., Amitai, M., Goldberger, J., Greenspan, H.: GAN-based synthetic medical image augmentation for increased CNN performance in liver lesion classification. Neurocomputing 321, 321–331 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neucom.2018.09.013. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0925231218310749

  7. Goodfellow, I., et al.: Generative adversarial networks. Commun. ACM 63(11), 139–144 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1145/3422622

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. Heim, E., et al.: Large-scale medical image annotation with crowd-powered algorithms. J. Med. Imaging 5(03), 1 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1117/1.jmi.5.3.034002. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6129178/

  9. Kohli, M.D., Summers, R.M., Geis, J.R.: Medical image data and datasets in the era of machine learning-whitepaper from the 2016 C-MIMI meeting dataset session. J. Digit. Imaging 30(4), 392–399 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10278-017-9976-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Montagnon, E., et al.: Deep learning workflow in radiology: a primer (2020). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-019-0832-5

  11. Press, W.H., Teukolsky, S.A., Vettering, W.T., Flannery, B.P.: Numerical Recipes the Art of Scientific Computing, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press (2007). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

  12. Taha, A.A., Hanbury, A.: Metrics for evaluating 3D medical image segmentation: analysis, selection, and tool. BMC Med. Imaging 15(1), 29 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12880-015-0068-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jimenez-del Toro, O., et al.: Cloud-based evaluation of anatomical structure segmentation and landmark detection algorithms: Visceral anatomy benchmarks. IEEE Trans. Med. Imaging 35(11), 2459–2475 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/TMI.2016.2578680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wong, S.C., Gatt, A., Stamatescu, V., McDonnell, M.D.: Understanding data augmentation for classification: when to warp? In: 2016 International Conference on Digital Image Computing: Techniques and Applications, DICTA 2016 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/DICTA.2016.7797091

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work has been partially supported by Statutory Funds of Electronics, Telecommunications and Informatics Faculty, Gdansk University of Technology, and grants from National Centre for Research and Development (Internet platform for data integration and collaboration of medical research teams for stroke treatment centers, PBS2/A3/17/2013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tomasz Dziubich .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2021 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Cychnerski, J., Dziubich, T. (2021). Segmentation Quality Refinement in Large-Scale Medical Image Dataset with Crowd-Sourced Annotations. In: Bellatreche, L., et al. New Trends in Database and Information Systems. ADBIS 2021. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1450. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85082-1_19

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85082-1_19

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-85081-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-85082-1

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics