Abstract
This paper presents a framework for agent communication and its mediation by technological systems. The goal of the framework is to provide quantitative mechanisms that will allow principled decisions to be made about the use and construction of mediating technological systems. Beginning with a simple model of interaction between agents, a model of communication influenced by bounded knowledge of others (or common ground) is developed. This leads to predictions that agent interactions generate equilibrium phenomena where optimal levels of grounding emerge over time between agents.
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
E. Coitera, When Communication is better than Computation. Journal American Medical Informatics Association. 7, 277–286, 2000.
P. Cobley (ed.), The Communication Theory Reader, Routledge, London, (1996).
H. Clarke, Using Language, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1996).
J. C. A. van der Lubbe, Information Theory, Cambridge University Press, (1997).
S. J. Russell, P. Norvig, Artificial Intelligence — a modern approach, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, (1995).
B. Moulin, B. Chaib-Draa, An overview of distributed artificial intelligence, in GMP O’Hare and NR Jennings (eds), Foundations of Distributed Artificial Intelligence, John Wiley and Sons, Inc., (1996).
R. Herken (ed.), The Universal Turing Machine — A half-century survey, Oxford University Press, Oxford, (1988).
H S. Bierman, L. Fernandez, Game Theory with economic applications, Addison-Wesley, Reading., Ma., (1995).
C R. Berger, Chatauqua: Why are there so few communication theories?, Communication Monographs, 58, 101–113, (1991).
B. Nardi (ed), Context in Consciousness — activity theory and human-computer interaction, MIT Press, Cambridge Ma., (1996).
L. Suchman, Plans and situated actions — the problem of human-machine communication, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, (1987).
R Brooks, Intelligence without representation, Artificial Intelligence, 47,139–159, (1991).
P. F. Lazarsfeld, R. K. Merton, Friendship as Social process: a substantive and methodological analysis, in M. Berger et al. (eds.), Freedom and Control in Modern Society, New York, Octagon (1964).
E. M. Rogers, Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Ed., Free Press, New York, (1995).
D Clarke, S. Brennan, Grounding in Communication, in L.B. Resnick J. Levine, & S.D. Behreno (Eds.), Perspectives on socially shared cognition, American Psychological Association, Washington, (1991).
CS Wallace, DM Boulton, An informatio n measure for classification, Comp. J, 11, 185–195, (1968).
J. C. McCarthy, A. F. Monk, Chan nels, conversation, co-operation and relevance: all you wanted to know about communication but were afraid to ask, Collaborative Computing,1:35–60 (1994).
B. Littlewood, Software Reliability: achievement and assessment, Blackwell Scientific Publications, (1987).
R.H. Frank, Microeconomics and behavior, 3rd Ed., McGraw Hill New York, (1997).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2001 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Coiera, E. (2001). Mediated Agent Interaction. In: Quaglini, S., Barahona, P., Andreassen, S. (eds) Artificial Intelligence in Medicine. AIME 2001. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 2101. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48229-6_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-48229-6_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-540-42294-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-540-48229-1
eBook Packages: Springer Book Archive