Abstract
Phased array ultrasonic testing (PAUT) has widely emerged as an innovative and improved method of assessing critical flaws in safety critical equipments of industrial plants. The technology gives a clear advantage over a conventional ultrasonic testing (UT). The utilization of advanced form of UT however has associated disadvantages and pitfalls. An attempt has been made to address some of the challenges that are associated to PAUT techniques in characterization of defects in 27 mm Al 6061-O curvilinear welds made from friction stir welding process (FSW). Three distinct defect parameters, i.e., (a) defect length, (b) defect height, and (c) defect position was estimated using PAUT. Quality of results are significantly dependent on important factors. These factors affect the probability of detection (POD). X-ray radiography was carried as a complimentary technique for defect identification. Defect sizing results of PAUT has been assessed and compared against macro-examination results. While PAUT has a proven record of exhibiting better POD, incorrect selection of parameters like probe selection, operator competency, scanning method and defect orientation can result in inconsistent results.
REFERENCES
Moles, M., Wesley, L., and Sinclair, T., Accurate defect sizing using phased array and signal processing, 7th Int. Conf. NDE Relation Struct. Integrity Nucl. Pressurized Compon. (Yokohama, 2009). https://www.ndt.net/article/jrc-nde2009/papers/85. Accessed August 8, 2022.
Wang, G., Zhao, Y., and Hao, Y., Friction stir welding of high-strength aerospace aluminum alloy and application in rocket tank manufacturing, J. Mater. Sci. & Technol., 2009, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 73–91.
Huggett, D., Wahab, M., Liao, T., and Okeil, A., On-line detection of friction stir welded joints by high temperature phased array ultrasonic inspection and control of weld process parameters, Int. Manuf. Sci. Eng. Conf. (Shanghai, 2017), vol. 50725, p. V001T02A002.
Huggett, D., Dewan, M., Wahab, M., Okeil, A., and Liao, T.W., Phased array ultrasonic testing for post-weld and online detection of friction stir welding defects, Res. Nondestr. Eval., 2017, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 187–210.
Birks, A.S., Green, R.E., and MacIntire, P., Generation and detection of ultrasound, in Nondestructive Testing Handbook: Ultrasonic Testing, Matrick O. Moore, Ed., Columbus: Am. Soc. Nondestr. Test., 1991, vol. 7, 3rd ed.
Olympus website. Phased array technology-cutting out the noise. https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/resources/books/. Accessed March 23, 2022.
Mishra, R.S. and Ma, Z.Y., Friction stir welding and processing, Mater. Sci. Eng. R, 2005, vol. 50, nos. 1–2, pp. 1–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mser.2005.07.001
Kah, P., Rajan, R., Martikainen. J., and Suoranta, R., Investigation of weld defects in friction-stir welding and fusion welding of aluminium alloys, Int. J. Mech. Eng., 2015, vol. 10, no. 1, pp. 1–10.
Chauhan, P., Jain, R., Pal, S.K., and Singh, S.B., Modeling of defects in friction stir welding using coupled Eulerian and Lagrangian method, J. Manuf. Proces., 2018, vol. 34, pp. 158–166.
Choudhary, A.K. and Jain, R., Fundamentals of friction stir welding, its application, and advancements, in Welding Technology, Davtim, J. Paulo, Ed., Basel: Springer, 2021, pp. 41–90.
Podržaj, P., Jerman, B., and Klobčar, D.J.M., Welding defects at friction stir welding, Metallurgija, 2015, vol. 54, no. 2, pp. 387–389.
Threadgill, P.L., Terminology in friction stir welding, Technol. Weld. & Joining, 2007, vol. 12, no. 4, pp. 357–360.
Morozov, M. and Gui Yun Tian, Eddy current tomograpgy of friction stir welds, Academia, 2010, pp. 1–10.
Minnesota State University website, Aluminium 6061-O. http://amet-me.mnsu.edu/userfilesshared/ DATA_ACQUISITION/mts/MET324/10-7-2011/MaterialData_9389-Al06061-2-fromMatWeb_com.pdf. Accessed August 15, 2022.
Rosado, L.S., Santos, T.G., Piedade, M., Ramos, P.M., and Vilaça, P.J.M., Advanced technique for nondestructive testing of friction stir welding of metals, Measurment, 2010, vol. 43, no. 8, pp. 1021–1030.
Li, B., Shen, Y., and Hu, W., The study on defects in aluminum 2219-T6 thick butt friction stir welds with the application of multiple non-destructive testing methods, Mater. & Des., 2011, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 2073–2084.
Olympuswebsite. Phase array probes and wedges. https://www.olympus-ims.com/en/probes. Accessed March 1, 2022.
Ditchburn, R. J. and Ibrahim, M.E., Ultrasonic Phased Arrays for the Inspection of Thick-Section Welds, Victoria: Defense Sci. Technol. Org., Maritime Platforms Div., 2009.
Moles, M., Wesley, L., and Sinclair, T., Accurate defect sizing using phased array and signal processing, 7th Int. Conf. NDE Relat. Struct. Integrity Nucl. Pressurized Compon. (Yokohama, 2009).
Jung Min-Jae, Park Byeong-Cheol, Lim Chae-Og, Lee Jae-Chul, and Shin Sung-Chul, Selection of PAUT probes for submarine pressure hull integrity assessment, Int. J. Naval Archit. Ocean Eng., 2020, vol. 12, pp. 578–595.
Silk, M.G., Defect detection and sizing in metals using ultrasound, Int. Mater. Rev., 1982, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 28–50.
Luo, H., Chen, Q.H., Doan, N.C.N., and Lin, W., Automated identification and characterization of clustered weld defects, Int. Conf. Adv. Intel. Mechatronics (Alberta, 2016).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ali, A.J., Jellani, A., Wadood, A. et al. Challenges Associated to Uultrasonic Techniques in Characterization of Friction Stir Weld Defects in 27 mm Thick Al 6061-O Plates. Russ J Nondestruct Test 59, 40–53 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830922600678
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1061830922600678