Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Development of a new water sterilization device with a 365 nm UV-LED

  • Short Communtication
  • Published:
Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultraviolet (UV) irradiation is an effective disinfection method. In sterilization equipment, a low-pressure mercury lamp emitting an effective germicidal UVC (254 nm) is used as the light source. However, the lamp, which contains mercury, must be disposed of at the end of its lifetime or following damage due to physical shock or vibration. We investigated the suitability of an ultraviolet light-emitting diode at an output wavelength of 365 nm (UVA-LED) as a sterilization device, comparing with the other wavelength irradiation such as 254 nm (a low-pressure mercury lam) and 405 nm (LED). We used a commercially available UVA-LED that emitted light at the shortest wavelength and at the highest output energy. The new sterilization system using the UVA-LED was able to inactivate bacteria, such as Escherichia coli DH5α, Enteropathogenic E. coli, Vibrio parahaemolyticus, Staphylococcus aureus, and Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis. The inactivations of the bacteria were dependent on the accumulation of UVA irradiation. Taking advantage of the safety and compact size of LED devices, we expect that the UVA-LED sterilization device can be developed as a new type of water sterilization device

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Chang HCJ, Ossoff SF, Lobe DC, Dorfman MH, Dumais CM, Qualls RG, Johnson JD (1985) UV inactivation of pathogenic and indicator. Microorganisms 49:1361–1365

    Google Scholar 

  2. Erofeev MV, Kieft IE, Sosnin EA, Stoffels E (2006) UV excimer lamp irradiation of fiboblasts: the influence on antioxidant homeostasis. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 34:1359–1364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kjellstrand P, Martinson E, Wieslander A, Holmquist B (1995) Development of toxic degradation products during heat sterilization of glucose-containing fluids for peritoneal dialysis: influence of time and temperature. Perit Dial Int 15:26–32

    Google Scholar 

  4. Lee JH, Kang M, Choung SJ, Ogino K, Miyata S, Kim MS, Park JY, Kim JB (2004) The preparation of TiO2 nanometer photocatalyst film by a hydrothermal method and its sterilization performance for Giardia lamblia. Water Res 38:713–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Muraca P, Stout JE, Yu VL (1987) Comparative assessment of chlorine, heat, ozone, and UV light for killing Legionella pneumophia within a model plumbing system. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:447–453

    Google Scholar 

  6. Nichia Corporation (2005) Specifications for nichia chip type UV led model. NCSU033A(T), no. STSE-CC6130A, Cat. No. 061218. http://www.nichia.co.jp/product/led-lamp-uv.html

  7. Oppenheimer JA, Jacangelo JG, Laine JM, Hoagland JE (1997) Testing the equivalency of ultraviolet light and chlorine for disinfection of wastewater to reclamation standards. Water Environ Res 69:14–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Oguma K, Katayama H, Ohgaki S (2004) Photoreactivation of Legionella pneumophia after binactivation by low or medium-pressure ultraviolet lamp. Water Res 38:2757–2763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reasoner DJ, Geldreich EE (1985) A new medium for the enumeration and subculture of bacteria from potable water. Appl Environ Microbiol 49:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  10. Ridgeway FH, Olson BH (1982) Chlorine Resistance Patterns of Bacteria from Two Drinking Water Distribution Systems. Appl Environ Microbiol 44:972–987

    Google Scholar 

  11. Soloshenko IA, Bazhenov VY, Khomich VA, Tsiolko VV, Potapchenko NG (2006) Comparative research of efficiency of water decontamination by UV radiation of cold hollow cathode discharge plasma versus that of low- and midium-pressure mercury lamps. IEEE Trans Prasma Sci 34:1365–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. WHO drinking water guideline. http://www.searo.who.int/EN/Section314_4295.htm#bacteriology

  13. Yu L (2003) Ultraviolet radiation. Free Radic Biol Msd 77:222

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by a grant-in-aid for scientific research (17790286) from the Ministry of Education, Science, Sports and Culture of Japan, the Human Nutritional Science on Stress Control 21st Century Center of Excellence Program (COE), an Industrial Technology Research Grant Program in 05A20001d from the New Energy and Industrial Technology Development Organization (NEDO) of Japan, and Practical Application Research from Japan Science and Technology Agency.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Akira Takahashi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mori, M., Hamamoto, A., Takahashi, A. et al. Development of a new water sterilization device with a 365 nm UV-LED. Med Bio Eng Comput 45, 1237–1241 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0263-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11517-007-0263-1

Keywords