Abstract
While sustainability in farming is increasingly recognised, practical implementation faces obstacles, including knowledge gaps that hinder farmers’ effective adaptation. Agricultural sensors have emerged as tools to assist farmers in offering real-time monitoring capabilities, which can provide information to support decision-making towards sustainable crop production. However, critical analyses point out that innovation in agricultural equipment predominantly focuses on optimising the dominant intensification model, while sensors might also facilitate biodiversity-based strategies toward agricultural sustainability, which aim to replace chemical inputs through intensified ecological interactions. In this article, we examine the intricate relationship between technology and practice, recognising that the functionality of sensors is contingent upon the user, manner of use, and implementation context. We employ social practice theory to examine farmers’ current sensor usage and broader sensing practices in farming system strategies that align either more with efficiency/substitution-based or with biodiversity-based approaches toward agricultural sustainability. Through this approach, we elucidate how sensors and sensing practices contribute to knowledge production and management in both farming systems. Drawing on 11 semi-structured interviews with Dutch farmers, we identify diverse sensing practices that can enable different types of knowledge: oversight—enabling farmers to optimise the efficiency of production—and insight—offering a holistic and long-term understanding of ecological relations and how they affect production. We conclude by discussing the implications of these sensing practices and types of knowledge for strategies for agricultural sustainability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adolwa, Ivan S., Stefan Schwarze, Imogen Bellwood-Howard, Nikolaus Schareika, and Andreas Buerkert. 2017. A comparative analysis of agricultural knowledge and innovation systems in Kenya and Ghana: Sustainable agricultural intensification in the rural–urban interface. Agriculture and Human Values 34 (2): 453–472. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-016-9725-0.
Ajena, Francesco, Nicola Bossard, Chantal Clément, Angelika Hilbeck, Bernadette Oehen, Jim Thomas, and Eugenio Tisselli. 2020. Agroecology & digitalisation: Traps and opportunities to transform the food system. Bruxelles: IFOAM Organics Europe.
Altieri, Miguel A. 1999. The ecological role of biodiversity in agroecosystems. Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 74: 19–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-8809(99)00028-6.
Altieri, Miguel, Clara Nicholls, and Rene Montalba. 2017. Technological approaches to sustainable agriculture at a crossroads: An agroecological perspective. Sustainability 9 (3): 349. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030349.
Bayer. 2024. Digital farming. Bayer. https://www.bayer.com/en/agriculture/digital-farming. Accessed 19 April 2024.
Bellon, Stéphane, and Jean-Louis Hemptinne. 2012. Reshaping boundaries between farming systems and the environment. In Farming systems research into the 21st century: The new dynamic, ed. Ika Darnhofer, David Gibbon, and Benoît Dedieu, 307–333. Dordrecht: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4503-2_14.
Bellon Maurel, Véronique, and Christian Huyghe. 2017. Putting agricultural equipment and digital technologies at the cutting edge of agroecology. OCL 24 (3): D307. https://doi.org/10.1051/ocl/2017028.
Bellon Maurel, Véronique, Ludovic Brossard, Frédérick Garcia, Nathalie Mitton, and Alexandre Termier. 2022. Agriculture and digital technology: Getting the most out of digital technology to contribute to the transition to sustainable agriculture and food systems. INRIA/INRAE. https://doi.org/10.17180/wmkb-ty56-en.
Caquet, Thierry, Chantal Gascuel, and Tixier-Boichard. Michèle. 2020. Agroecology: Research for the transition of agri-food chains and territories. éditions Quae. https://doi.org/10.35690/978-2-7592-3294-9.
Clapp, Jennifer, and Sarah-Louise Ruder. 2020. Precision technologies for agriculture: Digital farming, gene-edited crops, and the politics of sustainability. Global Environmental Politics 20 (3): 49–69. https://doi.org/10.1162/glep_a_00566.
Clavel, Danièle, Hélène Guétat-Bernard, and Eric O. Verger. 2023. Intensified rice production negatively impacts plant biodiversity, diet, lifestyle and quality of life: Transdisciplinary and gendered research in the Middle Senegal River Valley. Agriculture and Human Values 40 (2): 745–60. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-022-10392-5.
Cumulus Consultants. 2021. AgroEcoTech: How can technology accelerate a transition to agroecology? Report for The Soil Association. https://www.soilassociation.org/media/22821/agroecotech-soil-association-report.pdf
Duff, Hannah, Paul Hegedus, Sasha Loewen, Thomas Bass, and Bruce Maxwell. 2022. Precision agroecology. Sustainability 14 (1): 106. https://doi.org/10.3390/su14010106.
Duru, Michel, Olivier Therond, Guillaume Martin, Roger Martin-Clouaire, Marie-Angélina. Magne, Eric Justes, Etienne-Pascal. Journet, Jean-Noël. Aubertot, Serge Savary, Jacques-Eric. Bergez, and Jean Pierre Sarthou. 2015a. How to implement biodiversity-based agriculture to enhance ecosystem services: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35 (4): 1259–1281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0306-1.
Duru, Michel, Olivier Therond, and M’hand Fares. 2015b. Designing agroecological transitions: A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 35 (4): 1237–1257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-015-0318-x.
Garcia, Alberto. 2020. The environmental impacts of agricultural intensification. Washington: SPIA.
Gatti, Angela, and Alessio Zanoli. 2022. Revolution in precision of positioning systems: Diffusing practice in agroecology and organic farming. In Drones and geographical information technologies in agroecology and organic farming contributions to technological sovereignty, ed. Massimo De Marchi, Alberto Diantini, and Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo, 75–98. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Gliessman, Steve. 2016. Transforming food systems with agroecology. Agroecology and Sustainable Food Systems 40 (3): 187–189. https://doi.org/10.1080/21683565.2015.1130765.
Godfray, H., J. Charles, John R. Beddington, Ian R. Crute, Lawrence Haddad, David Lawrence, James F. Muir, Jules Pretty, Sherman Robinson, Sandy M. Thomas, and Camilla Toulmin. 2010. Food security: The challenge of feeding 9 billion people. Science 327 (5967): 812–818. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185383.
HLPE. 2019. Agroecological and other innovative approaches for sustainable agriculture and food systems that enhance food security and nutrition. A report by the High-Level Panel of Experts on Food Security and Nutrition of the Committee on World Food Security, Rome.
Horton, Peter. 2017. We need radical change in how we produce and consume food. Food Security 9 (6): 1323–1327. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-017-0740-9.
Huttunen, Suvi, and Peter Oosterveer. 2015. Transition to sustainable fertilisation in agriculture, a practices approach. Sociologia Ruralis 57 (2): 191–210. https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12118.
IAASTD. 2009. Agriculture at a crossroads—Global report. International assessment of agricultural knowledge, science and technology for development. Island Press, Washington, DC. ISBN 978-1-59726-538-6.
IPES-Food. 2016. From uniformity to diversity: A paradigm shift from industrial agriculture to diversified agroecological systems. International Panel of Experts on Sustainable Food systems.
John Deere. 2024. 2023 Business impact report. https://www.deere.eu/assets/pdfs/common/our-company/sustainability/business-impact-report-2023.pdf. Accessed 19 April 2024.
Jung, Andrâs, and Michael Vohland. 2022. Hyperspectral remote sensing and field spectroscopy: Applications in agroecology and organic farming. In Drones and geographical information technologies in agroecology and organic farming contributions to technological sovereignty, ed. Massimo De Marchi, Alberto Diantini, and Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo, 99–121. Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429052842-7.
Kassam, Amir, Theodor Friedrich, Francis Shaxson, Timothy Reeves, Jules Pretty, and João Carlos. de Moraes Sá. 2011. Production systems for sustainable intensification. TATuP-Zeitschrift Für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie Und Praxis 20 (2): 38–45. https://doi.org/10.14512/tatup.20.2.38.
Kremen, Claire, Alastair Iles, and Christopher Bacon. 2012. Diversified farming systems: An agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecology and Society 17 (4): art44. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-05103-170444.
Lobsey, C., and A. Biswas, eds. 2022. Advances in sensor technology for sustainable crop production. Cambridge: Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing.
Malézieux, Eric. 2012. Designing cropping systems from nature. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 32 (1): 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0027-z.
MEA. 2005. Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Millennium ecosystem assessment. Island Press, Washington, DC. ISBN 1-59726-040-1.
Orlikowski, Wanda J. 1992. The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science 3 (3): 398–427. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.3.3.398.
Orlikowski, Wanda J. 2000. Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organizations. Organization Science 11 (4): 404–428. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.11.4.404.14600.
Pappalardo, Salvatore Eugenio, and Diego Andrade. 2022. Drones for good: UAS applications in agroecology and organic farming. In Drones and geographical information technologies in agroecology and organic farming contributions to technological sovereignty, ed. Massimo De Marchi, Alberto Diantini, and Salvatore Eugenio Pappalardo, 122–148. Boca Raton: CRC Press. https://doi.org/10.1201/9780429052842-8.
Rains, Glen Christopher, Dawn M. Olson, and Wallace Joe Lewis. 2011. Redirecting technology to support sustainable farm management practices. Agricultural Systems 104 (4): 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2010.12.008.
Reckwitz, Andreas. 2002. Toward a theory of social practices: A development in culturalist theorizing. European Journal of Social Theory 5 (2): 243–263. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684310222225432.
Salembier, Chloé, Blanche Segrestin, Nicolas Sinoir, Joseph Templier, Weil Benoît, and Meynard Jean-Marc. 2020. Design of equipment for agroecology: Coupled innovation processes led by farmer-designers. Agricultural Systems 183: 102856. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2020.102856.
Shove, Elizabeth. 2004. changing human behaviour and lifestyle: A challenge for sustainable consumption? In The ecological economics of consumption, ed. Lucia A. Reisch and Inge Røpke. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing. https://doi.org/10.4337/9781845423568.00014.
Shove, Elizabeth, Mika Pantzar, and Matt Watson. 2012. The dynamics of social practice: Everyday life and how it changes. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446250655.
Shove, Elizabeth, and Alan Warde. 2002. Inconspicuous consumption: The sociology of consumption, lifestyles and the environment. In Sociological theory & the environment: Classical foundations, contemporary insights, ed. Riley Dunlap, Frederick Buttel, Peter Dickens, and August Gijswijt. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Siebrecht, Norman. 2020. Sustainable agriculture and its implementation gap—Overcoming obstacles to implementation. Sustainability 12 (9): 3853. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12093853.
Singh, Jay Shankar, Vimal Chandra Pandey, and Devendra Pratap Singh. 2011. Efficient soil microorganisms: A new dimension for sustainable agriculture and environmental development. Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment 140 (3–4): 339–353. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2011.01.017.
Spiertz, Huub. 2012. Avenues to meet food security. The role of agronomy on solving complexity in food production and resource use. European Journal of Agronomy 43: 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2012.04.004.
Therond, Olivier, Michel Duru, Jean Roger-Estrade, and Guy Richard. 2017. A new analytical framework of farming system and agriculture model diversities. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development 37 (3): 21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-017-0429-7.
Webster, Andrew, and John Gardner. 2019. Aligning technology and institutional readiness: The adoption of innovation. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management 31 (10): 1229–1241. https://doi.org/10.1080/09537325.2019.1601694.
Funding
This work was supported by Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) Grant No. (NWO grant 17626).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The Synergia project is organized and led by Wageningen University and Research in close cooperation with Next Food Collective as well as the Universities of Delft, Twente, Eindhoven, and Nijmegen. The authors have declared that no competing interests exist in the writing of this publication. Funding for this research was obtained from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO grant 17626), IMEC-One Planet and other private parties.
Ethical approval
Approval was obtained from the BMS ethics committee of the University of Twente.
Informed consent
was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher’s note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Gorissen, L., Konrad, K. & Turnhout, E. Sensors and sensing practices: shaping farming system strategies toward agricultural sustainability. Agric Hum Values (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10686-w
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-024-10686-w