Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content
Log in

Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in many cultivars of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.)

  • Developmental Biology/Morphogenesis
  • Published:
In Vitro Cellular & Developmental Biology - Plant Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Embryogenic callus was formed from several cultivars of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) when sections of hypocotyl and cotyledon were cultured on medium supplemented with 5 mg/liter 6-(γ, γ-dimethylallyl-amino)-purine (2iP) and 0.1 mg/liter α-naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) for callus initiation and proliferation, and subcultured on medium supplemented with 5 mg/liter NAA and 0.1 to 1 mg/liter 2iP for embryogenic callus induction. It seems that a high 2iP:auxin ratio is preferred for callus initiation and proliferation, but should be exchanged with a higher NAA:cytokinin ratio before differentiation will occur. Embryogenic calluses were recovered at a frequency of 2 to 85% depending on the cultivar used. Coker cultivars produced embryogenic callus faster and at higher frequencies than other cultivars. Embryogenic callus produced somatic embryos on phytohormone-free medium. This medium was used to maintain and proliferate embryogenic callus for a perid of 18 to 24 mo. Somatic embryos were converted to plants on a lower ionic strength medium supplemented with 0.1 mg/liter gibberellic acid (GA3) and 0.01 mg/liter NAA. Glucose was the only carbohydrate used through all phases of tissue culture and was much better than sucrose, on which phenolic production was very high. High temperature (30° C) and low light intensity (9 µE · m−2 · s−1) were optimal conditions for callus initiation, embryogenic callus induction, and maintenance, whereas lower temperature (25° C) and high light intensity (90 µE · m−2 s−1) were the optimal conditions for somatic embryo maturation, germination, and plantlet development. Plants could be regenerated within 10 to 12 wk in Cokers or 7 to 8 mo. in others.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beasley, C. A.; Ting, I. P. The effects of plant growth substances onin vitro fiber development from fertilized cotton ovules. Am. J. Bot. 2:130–139; 1973.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Davidonis, G. H.; Hamilton, R. H. Plant regeneration from callus tissue ofGossypium hirsutum L. Plant Sci. Lett. 32:89–93; 1983.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Finer, J. J. Plant regeneration from somatic embryogenic suspension cultures of cotton,Gossypium hirsutum L. Plant Cell Rep. 7:399–402; 1988.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Finer, J. J.; McMullen, M. D. Transformation of cottonGossypium hirsutum L. via particle bombardment. Plant Cell Rep. 8:586–589; 1990.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Finer, J. J.; Smith, R. H. Initiation of callus and somatic embryos from explants of mature cotton (Gossypium klotzchianum Anderss.). Plant Cell Rep. 3:41–43; 1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Firoozabady, E.; DeBoer, D. L.; Merlo, D. J., et al. Transformation of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) byAgrobacterium tumefaciens and regeneration of transgenic plants. Plant Mol. Biol. 10:105–116; 1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Firoozabady, E.; DeBoer, D. L. Isolation, culture, and cell division in cotyledon protoplasts of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum andG. barbadense). Plant Cell Rep. 5:127–131; 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Firoozabady, E. Rapid plant regeneration fromNicotiana mesophyll protoplasts. Plant Sci. 46:127–131; 1986.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Price, H. J.; Smith, R. H. Somatic embryogenesis in suspension cultures ofGossypium klotzschianum Anderss. Planta 145:305–307; 1979.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reynolds, T. L. Somatic embryogenesis and organogenesis from callus cultures ofSolanum carolinense. Am. J. Bot. 6:914–918; 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Shoemaker, R. C.; Couche, L. J.; Galbraith, D. W. Characterization of somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Cell Rep. 3:178–181; 1986.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Smith, R. H.; Price, H. J.; Thaxton, J. B. Defined conditions for the initiation and growth of cotton callus in vitro. I.Gossypium arboreum. In Vitro 13:329–334; 1977.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Stewart, J. McD.; Hsu, C. L.In ovulo embryo culture and seedling development of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Planta 137:113–117; 1977.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Umbeck, P.; Johnson, G.; Barton, K., et al. Genetically transformed cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) plants. Bio-Technology 5:263–266; 1987.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Trolinder, N. L.; Goodin, J. R. Somatic embryogenesis and plant regeneration inGossypium hirsutum L. Plant Cell Rep. 6:231–234; 1987.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Trolinder, N. L.; Goodin, J. R. Somatic embryogenesis in cotton (Gossypium): I. Effects of source of explant and hormone regime. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 12:31–42; 1988.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Trolinder, N. L.; Xhixian, C. Genotype specificity of the somatic embryogenesis response in cotton. Plant Cell Rep. 8:133–136; 1989.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Firoozabady, E., DeBoer, D.L. Plant regeneration via somatic embryogenesis in many cultivars of cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). In Vitro Cell Dev Biol - Plant 29, 166–173 (1993). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02632030

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02632030

Key words

Navigation