Abstract
This study empirically analyzes the structure and behavior of the patent litigation network in the U.S. by introducing complex network theory characterized as growth and preferential attachment rules. In this study, we draw a log-log plot of the probability distribution for both the plaintiff and the defendant sides and use a log-transform regression to verify that the patent litigation network degree distribution follows a power-law distribution. We also graph the structure of the network to explore the origin of its asymmetrical pattern. In addition, we investigate the behavior of the patent litigation network over time by calculating the Shannon entropy for each year from 2005 to September 2016. We find the power-law degree distribution, and a few hubs of the patent litigation network are like other real-world networks. We also find that the asymmetrical pattern of the patent litigation network is largely driven by non-practicing entities and the major information technology firms. We conclude that the patent litigation network is becoming more asymmetrical over time based on our finding that its Shannon entropy is decreasing.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
N. Goldenfeld and L. P. Kadanoff, Science 284, 87 (1999).
A. L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science 286, 509 (1999).
R. Albert and A. L. Barabási, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 47 (2002).
P. Erdös and A. Rényi, Publicationes Mathematicae 6, 290 (1959).
H. J. Kim and I. M. Kim, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 40, 1105 (2002).
D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature 393, 440 (1998).
S. Lee, J. Korean Phys. Soc. 67, 1703 (2015).
R. Albert, H. Jeong and A. L. Barabási, Nature 401, 130 (1999).
R. Guimera, S. Mossa, A. Turtschi and L. A. N. Amaral, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 7794 (2005).
W. Li and X. Cai, Physica A 382, 693 (2007).
H. Kim and J. Song, Technol. Forecast. Soc. 80, 944 (2013).
C. Y. Tsai and N. N. An, in the Fourth International Conference on Informatics & Applications (Takamatsu, 2015), p. 185.
J. S. Helm, Mich. Telecomm. Tech. L. Rev. 13, 331 (2006).
C. V. Chien, N. C. L. Rev. 87, 1571 (2009).
T. Fischer and J. Henkel, Res. Policy 41, 1519 (2012).
S. K. Shrestha, Colum. L. Rev. 114, 114 (2010).
C. Sternizke, A. Bartkowski, H. Schwanbeck and R. Schramm, World Patent Information 29, 327 (2007).
C. Sternizke, A. Bartkowski and R. Schramm, World Patent Information 30, 115 (2008).
C. Barry, R. Arad, L. Ansell and E. Clark, 2014 Patent litigation study as case volume leaps (PWC, 2014).
G. N. Magliocca, Notre Dame L. Rev. 82, 1809 (2007).
P. M. Mersino, Ave Maria L. Rev. 6, 307 (2007).
J. E. Bessen, M. J. Meurer and J. L. Ford, Boston Univ. School of Law, Law and Economics Research Paper No.11-45 (2011).
G. G. Ball and J. P. Kesan, Ill. Law & Econ. Papers Series, Research Papers Series No. LE09-005 (2009).
RPX. Form S-1 registration statement. U.S Securities and Exchange Commission. https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1509432/000119312511240287/ds1.htm, Last accessed on October 20, 2016.
S. Nam, C. Nam and S. Kim, Technol. Forecast. Soc. 95, 182 (2015).
C. Duhigg and S. Lohr, The patent, used as a sword. The New York Times (Oct. 7, 2012).
Acknowledgments
This work (Grant No. 04150108) was supported by Business for University Entrepreneurship Center funded by the Korea Small and Medium Business Administration.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, D., Kim, J. & Shin, J. Scale-free network analysis of big data for patent litigation cases in the United States. Journal of the Korean Physical Society 70, 431–435 (2017). https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.70.431
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3938/jkps.70.431