Abstract
The implementation of information and communication technology in the health care sector is of considerable interest, since it has been proved that it leads to benefits like improved health care quality, patient safety and satisfaction as well as favorable cost-effectiveness compared to traditional services.
However, the implementation of electronic health services (e-health services) as innovative interventions or tools into routine care is a slow and unpredictable process. To speed up this development and to attain a wide dissemination, this study aims at identifying the decision-making process of the first use (adoption process) of an e-health service from the user’s respectively patient’s perspective. Fifty seven conducted semi-structured problem-centered interviews reveal that the typical adoption process consists of the following six phases: (1) latency phase, (2) initiative phase, (3) information phase, (4) decision phase, (5) trial phase and (6) confirmation phase. These insights contribute to the adoption theory.
In order to guarantee a comprehensive analysis of the adoption process for e-health services, the paper has the following structure: A definition and a classification of e-health (services) as well as the theoretical concepts and a literature overview of the adoption process lay the foundation for the conducted study. In the following, the study description and the results of the qualitative e-health user interviews are presented. The paper ends with implications on theory and practice and a short outlook.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
- 1.
Kyratis et al. (2012) focus e.g., on the adoption and implementation of technology in primary and acute care organizations in England.
References
Ball MJ, Lillis J (2001) E-health: transforming the physician/patient relationship. Int J Med Inform 61(1):1–10
Bertaux D (1981) From the life-history approach to the transformation of sociological practice. In: Bertaux D (ed) Biography and society: the life history approach in the social sciences. Sage, London, pp 29–45
Berwick DM (2003) Disseminating innovations in health care. JAMA 289(15):1969–1975
BITKOM (2013) BITKOM-Umfrage: Zahlungsbereitschaft für Apps steigt. http://www.marktforschung.de/nachrichten/marktforschung/bitkom-umfrage-zahlungsbereitschaft-fuer-apps-steigt. Accessed 06 Aug 2015
Bitner MJ, Booms BH, Tetreault MS (1990) The service encounter: diagnosing favorable and unfavorable incidents. J Mar 54(1):71–84
Black AD, Car J, Pagliari C et al (2011) The impact of eHealth on the quality and safety of health care: a systematic overview. PLoS One 8(1), e1000387
Cunningham SG, Wake DJ, Waller A et al (2014) Definitions of eHealth. In: Gaddi A, Capello F, Manca M (eds) eHealth, care and quality of life. Springer, Milano, pp 15–30
De Jong CC, Ros WJG, Schrijvers G (2014) The effects on health behavior and health outcomes of Internet-based asynchronous communication between health providers and patients with a chronic condition: a systematic review. J Med Internet Res 16(1), e19
DiCicco-Bloom B, Crabtree BF (2006) The qualitative research interview. Med Educ 40(4):314–321
Eysenbach G (2001) What is eHealth? J Med Internet Res 3(2), e20
Flanagan JC (1954) The critical incident technique. Psychol Bull 51(4):327–358
Flick U (2014) An introduction to qualitative research. Sage, Los Angeles
Gagnon MP, Desmartis M, Labrecque M et al (2012) Systematic review of factors influencing the adoption of information and communication technologies by healthcare professionals. J Med Syst 36(1):241–277
Gatignon H, Robertson TS (1991) Innovative decision processes. In: Robertson TS, Kassarjian HH (eds) Handbook of consumer behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, pp 316–348
Geissbühler A (2012) eHealth: easing the transitions in healthcare. Swiss Med Wkly 142:w13599
Griffin A, Hauser JR (1993) The voice of the customer. Mark Sci 12(1):1–27
Hassinger E (1959) Stages in the adoption process. Rural Sociol 24(1):52–53
Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P (2011a) The practice of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p 3
Hesse-Biber SN, Leavy P (2011b) The practice of qualitative research. Sage, Thousand Oaks, p 10
Janis IL, Mann L (1977) Decision making: a psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. Free Press, New York
Klersy C, De Silvestri A, Gabutti G et al (2011) Economic impact of remote patient monitoring: an integrated economic model derived from a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail 13(4):450–459
Kollmann T (2013) Online-Marketing. Grundlagen der Absatzpolitik in der Net Economy. Verlag W Kohlhammer, Stuttgart
Kyratis Y, Ahmad R, Holmes A (2012) Technology adoption and implementation in organisations: comparative case studies of 12 English NHS Trusts. BMJ Open 2, e000872
Lanseng EJ, Andreassen TW (2007) Electronic healthcare: a study of people’s readiness and attitude toward performing self-diagnosis. Int J Serv Ind Manag 18(4):394–417
Logan J, Graham ID (1998) Toward a comprehensive interdisciplinary model of health care research use. Sci Commun 20(2):227–246
Mason M (2010) Sample size and saturation in PhD studies using qualitative interviews. Forum Qualitative Soc Res 11(3), 8
Meier CA, Fitzgerald MC, Smith JM (2013) eHealth: extending, enhancing, and evolving health care. Annu Rev Biomed Eng 15:359–382
Nabih MI, Bloem G, Poiesz TBC (1997) Conceptual issues in the study of innovation adoption behavior. Adv Consum Res 24(1):190–196
Oh H, Rizo C, Enkin M, Jadad A (2005) What is eHealth (3): a systematic review of published definitions. J Med Internet Res 7(1), e1
Pagliari C, Sloan D, Gregor P et al (2005) What is eHealth (4): a scoping exercise to map the field. J Med Internet Res 7(1), e9
Pathman DE, Konrad TR, Freed GL et al (1996) The awareness-to-adherence model of the steps to clinical guideline compliance. Med Care 34(9):873–889
Pedone C, Chiurco D, Scarlata S et al (2013) Efficacy of multiparametric telemonitoring on respiratory outcomes in elderly people with COPD: a randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res 13:82
Ramtohul I (2015) The adoption of e-health services: comprehensive analysis of the adoption setting from the user’s perspective. Health Policy Technol 4(3):286–293. doi:10.1016/j.hlpt.2015.04.007
Robertson TS (1971) Innovative behavior and communication. Holt, Rinehard and Winston, New York
Rogers EM (2003a) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York
Rogers EM (2003b) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, p 20
Rogers EM (2003c) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, pp 168–194
Rogers EM (2003d) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, p 172
Rogers EM (2003e) Diffusion of innovations. Free Press, New York, p 177
Ryan B, Gross NC (1943) The diffusion of hybrid seed corn in two Iowa communities. Rural Sociol 8(1):15–24
Showell C, Nøhr C (2012) How should we define eHealth, and does the definition matter? Stud Health Technol Inform 180:881–884
Sintonen S, Immonen M (2013) Telecare services for aging people: assessment of critical factors influencing the adoption intention. Comput Hum Behav 29(4):1307–1317
Trappenburg J, Niesink A, de Weert-van Oene G et al (2008) Effects of telemonitoring in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Telemed e-Health 14(2):138–146
Tzelepis F, Paul CL, Walsh RA et al (2011) Proactive telephone counseling for smoking cessation: meta-analyses by recruitment channel and methodological quality. J Natl Cancer Inst 103(12):922–941
Wee TTT (2003) Factors affecting new product adoption in the consumer electronics industry. Singap Manag Rev 25(2):51–71
Weinstein ND, Sandman PM, Blalock SJ (2008) The precaution adoption process model. In: Glanz K, Rimer BK, Viswanath K (eds) Health behavior and health education. Theory, research, and practice, 4th edn. San Francisco, Jossey-Bass, pp 123–148
Witzel A (2000) The problem-centered interview. Forum Qualitative Soc Res 1(1):1–9
Zhang NJ, Seblega B, Wan T et al (2013) Health information technology adoption in U.S. acute care hospitals. J Med Syst 37(2):9907
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramtohul, I. (2016). Identifying the Adoption Process for Electronic Health Services: A Qualitative Study. In: Albach, H., Meffert, H., Pinkwart, A., Reichwald, R., von Eiff, W. (eds) Boundaryless Hospital. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49012-9_15
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-49012-9_15
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-662-49010-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-662-49012-9
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)