Abstract
Over the past years, several initiatives have emerged worldwide towards the provision of open access to educational resources, in the form of learning objects (LOs). The main objective of such initiatives is to support the process of organizing, classifying, and storing LOs and their associated metadata in Web-based repositories which are called learning object repositories (LORs). Within this framework, popular ways for describing LOs are the Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (DCMES) and the IEEE Learning Object Metadata (LOM) Standard. However, it has been recognized that it is not possible for generic standards such as DCMES and IEEE LOM to be used to fully meet community and context-specific users’ needs. This has lead to the emergence of the metadata application profile (AP) concept and a number of metadata APs have been developed, which are used by a variety of LORs that are currently operating online. On the other hand, with many LORs implemented based on different metadata APs, the issue of metadata interoperability between these LORs is crucial. In this chapter, we focus on metadata interoperability of different LORs that have been developed by institutions, communities, or consortiums in Europe. More specifically, we present the results of a systematic analysis of metadata APs used in nineteen (19) European LORs, and we provide recommendations for future development of metadata APs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berners-Lee, T. (1997). Axioms of web architecture: Metadata architecture. Retrieved May 31, 2013, from http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Metadata.html
Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open educational resources: Enabling universal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1), 1–11.
Currier, S. (2008). Metadata for learning resources: An update on standards activity for 2008. ARIADNE, 55. Retrieved May 31, 2013, from http://www.ariadne.ac.uk/issue55/currier/
Dublin Core Metadata Element Set (DCMES), Version 1.1. (2004). Reference description. Retrieved May 31, 2013, from http://dublincore.org/documents/2004/12/20/dces/
Duval, E., Hodgins, W., Sutton, S., & Weibel, S. L. (2002). Metadata principles and practicalities. D-Lib Magazine, 8(4). Retrieved May 31, 2013, from http://www.dlib.org/dlib/april02/weibel/04weibel.htm
EdReNe. (2008). Current state of educational repositories. Available from http://edrene.org/results/index.html
Ehlers, U. D. (2011). Extending the territory: From open educational resources to open educational practices. Journal of Open, Flexible and Distance Learning, 15(2), 1–10.
Heery, R., & Patel, M. (2000). Application profiles: Mixing and matching metadata schemas. Ariadne, 25, 27–31.
IEEE Learning Technology Standards Committee (LTSC). (2005). Final standard for learning object metadata. Retrieved May 31, 2013, from http://ltsc.ieee.org/wg12/files/IEEE_1484_12_03_d8_submitted.pdf
IMS Global Learning Consortium (GLC). (2005). IMS application profile guidelines technical manual. Retrieved December 1, 2010, from http://www.imsglobal.org/ap/apv1p0/imsap_techv1p0.html
Mason, R. T., & Ellis, T. J. (2009). Extending SCORM LOM. Issues in Informing Science and Information Technology, 6, 864–875.
Mason, J., & Galatis, H. (2007). Theory and practice of application profile development in Australian education and training. In S. A. Sutton, A. S. Chaudhry, & C. Koo (Eds.), Proceedings of the 2007 international conference on Dublin core and metadata applications: Application profiles: Theory and practice (DCMI’07) (pp. 43–52). Singapore: Dublin Core Metadata Initiative and National Library Board.
McGreal, R. (2004). Online education using learning objects. Washington, DC: Falmer Press.
McGreal, R. (2008). A typology of learning object repositories. In H. H. Adelsberger, Kinshuk, J. M. Pawlowski, & G. D. Sampson (Eds.), Handbook of information technologies for education and training (2nd ed.). New York: Springer.
Najjar, J. (2008, February). Learning object metadata: An empirical investigation and lessons learned. Ph.D. thesis, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven.
NISO. (2004). Understanding metadata. Bethesda: National Information Standards Organisation Press.
Ochoa, X., & Duval, E. (2009). Quantitative analysis of learning object repositories. IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 2(3), 226–238.
Smith, N., Van Coillie, M., & Duval, E. (2006). Guidelines and support for building application profiles in e-learning. In N. Smith, M. Van Coillie, & E. Duval (Eds.), CEN/ISSS WS/LT learning technologies workshop CWA (pp. 1–26). Brussels: CEN Workshop Agreements.
Tzikopoulos, A., Manouselis, N., & Vuorikari, R. (2007). An overview of learning object repositories. In P. Northrup (Ed.), Learning objects for instruction: Design and evaluation (pp. 29–55). New York: Idea Group Inc.
UNESCO. (2002). Forum on the impact of open courseware for higher education in developing countries final report. Retrieved May 21, 2013, from http://unesdoc.unesco.org/images/0012/001285/128515e.pdf
Wiley, D. A. (2002). The instructional use of learning objects. Bloomington: Association for Educational Communications and Technology.
Acknowledgments
The work presented in this chapter has been partly supported by the Open Discovery Space Project that is funded by the European Commission’s CIP-ICT Policy Support Programme (Project Number: 297229).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2014 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Zervas, P., Kalamatianos, A., Sampson, D.G. (2014). A Systematic Analysis of Metadata Application Profiles of Learning Object Repositories in Europe. In: Huang, R., Kinshuk, ., Chen, NS. (eds) The New Development of Technology Enhanced Learning. Lecture Notes in Educational Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38291-8_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38291-8_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-38290-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-38291-8
eBook Packages: Humanities, Social Sciences and LawEducation (R0)