Performance of Specific vs. Generic Feature Sets in Polyphonic Music Instrument Recognition

1. Beume, N., Naujoks, B., Emmerich, M.: SMS-EMOA: Multiobjective Selection Based on Dominated Hypervolume. European Journal of Operational Research 181(3), 1653–1669 (2007)

   Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

2. Bischl, B., Mersmann, O., Trautmann, H., Weihs, C.: Resampling Methods for Meta-Model Validation with Recommendations for Evolutionary Computation. Evolutionary Computation 20(2), 249–275 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Bischl, B., Vatolkin, I., Preuss, M.: Selecting Small Audio Feature Sets in Music Classification by Means of Asymmetric Mutation. In: Schaefer, R., Cotta, C., Kołodziej, J., Rudolph, G. (eds.) PPSN XI. LNCS, vol. 6238, pp. 314–323. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

4. Brown, J.C.: Calculation of a constant Q spectral transform. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 89(1), 425–434 (1991)

   Article  Google Scholar 

5. Brown, J.C.: Computer identification of musical instruments using pattern recognition with cepstral coefficients as features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 105(3), 1933–1941 (1999)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Burred, J.J., Röbel, A., Sikora, T.: Dynamic spectral envelope modeling for timbre analysis of musical instrument sounds. IEEE Transactions on Audio, Speech, and Language Processing 18(3), 663–674 (2010)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Coello Coello, C.A., Lamont, G.L., van Veldhuizen, D.A.: Evolutionary Algorithms for Solving Multi-Objective Problems. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)

   MATH  Google Scholar 

8. Eichhoff, M., Weihs, C.: Musical Instrument Recognition by High-Level Features. In: Proceedings of the 34th Annual Conference of the German Classification Society, pp. 373–381. Springer (2012)

   Google Scholar 

9. Eronen, A.: Signal Processing Methods for Audio Classification and Music Content Analysis. PhD thesis, Tampere University of Technology, Departmrnt of Signal Processing (2009)

   Google Scholar 

10. Fiebrink, R., Fujinaga, I.: Feature Selection Pitfalls and Music Classification. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR, pp. 340–341 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

11. Goto, M., Hashiguchi, H., Nishimura, T., Oka, R.: RWC Music Database: Music Genre Database and Musical Instrument Sound Database. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR, pp. 229–230 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

12. Guyon, I., Gunn, S., Nikravesh, M., Zadeh, L.: Feature Extraction, Foundations and Applications. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

13. Jelasity, M., Preuß, M., Eiben, A.E.: Operator Learning for a Problem Class in a Distributed Peer-to-Peer Environment. In: Guervós, J.J.M., Adamidis, P.A., Beyer, H.-G., Fernández-Villacañas, J.-L., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN VII. LNCS, vol. 2439, pp. 172–183. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

14. Kitahara, T., Goto, M., Komatani, K., Ogata, T., Okuno, H.G.: Instrument identification in polyphonic music: Feature weighting to minimize influence of sound overlaps. EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing (2007)

    Google Scholar 

15. Lartillot, O., Toiviainen, P.: MIR in Matlab (ii): a Toolbox for Musical Feature Extraction from Audio. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR, pp. 127–130 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

16. Livshin, A., Rodet, X.: The significance of the non-harmonic “noise” versus the harmonic series for musical instrument recognition. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Music Information Retrieval, ISMIR, pp. 95–100 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

17. Park, T.H.: Introduction to Digital Signal Processing: Computer Musically Speaking. World Scientific (2010)

    Google Scholar 

18. Quinlan, J.R.: C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann (1993)

    Google Scholar 

19. Vatolkin, I., Theimer, W., Botteck, M.: AMUSE (Advanced MUSic Explorer) - A Multitool Framework for Music Data Analysis. In: Proceedings of the 11th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference, ISMIR, pp. 33–38 (2010)

    Google Scholar 

20. Vatolkin, I., Preuß, M., Rudolph, G.: Multi-Objective Feature Selection in Music Genre and Style Recognition Tasks. In: Proceedings of the Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference, GECCO, pp. 411–418. ACM Press (2011)

    Google Scholar 

21. Vatolkin, I., Preuß, M., Rudolph, G., Eichhoff, M., Weihs, C.: Multi-objective evolutionary feature selection for instrument recognition in polyphonic audio mixtures. Soft Computing - A Fusion of Foundations, Methodologies and Applications 16(12), 2027–2047 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

22. Wu, J., Vincent, E., Raczyński, S.A., Nishimoto, T., Ono, N., Sagayama, S.: Polyphonic Pitch Estimation and Instrument Identification by Joint Modeling of Sustained and Attack Sounds. IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Signal Processing 5(6), 1124–1132 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Zitzler, E., Thiele, L.: Multiobjective Optimization Using Evolutionary Algorithms - A Comparative Case Study. In: Eiben, A.E., Bäck, T., Schoenauer, M., Schwefel, H.-P. (eds.) PPSN V. LNCS, vol. 1498, pp. 292–301. Springer, Heidelberg (1998)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

Download references