Abstract
In this paper we present a network analytic approach for the detection and improved understanding of the dynamics of communities. As a practical example of our own research practice we applied these ideas to the community of CRIWG researchers and checked for the feasibility of our approach. We will present our results on indicators for collaboration and also propose some practices from other fields to intensify scientific discussion and production.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Moreno, J.L.: Who Shall Survive? Beacon House, Beacon (1934)
de Solla Price, D.J.: Network of scientific papers. Science 149, 510–515 (1965)
Crane, D.: Invisible Colleges. Diffusion of knowledge in scientific communities. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago (1972)
Antunes, P., Pino, J.A.: A review of CRIWG research. In: Kolfschoten, G., Herrmann, T., Lukosch, S. (eds.) CRIWG 2010. LNCS, vol. 6257, pp. 1–15. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Kienle, A., Wessner, M.: The CSCL community in its first decade: Development, continuity, connectivity. IJCSCL 1(1) (2006)
Hoadley, C.M.: The shape of the elephant: scope and membership of the cscl community. In: Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, pp. 205–210 (2005)
Pham, M.C., Derntl, M., Klamma, R.: Development patterns of scientific communities in technology enhanced learning. Educational Technology & Society 15(3), 323–335 (2012)
Barabási, A.-L., Albert, R., Jeong, H.: Mean-field theory for scale-free random networks. Physica A, 173–187 (1999)
Velden, T., Haque, A., Lagoze, C.: A new approach to analyzing patterns of collaboration in co-authorship networks: mesoscopic analysis and interpretation. Scientometrics 85(1), 219–242 (2010)
Wasserman, S., Faust, K.: Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1994)
de Nooy, W., Mrvar, A., Batagelj, V.: Exploratory Network Analysis with Pajek. Cambridge University Press (2005)
Kienle, A., Wessner, M.: e-learning zwischen alpen und küste – eine analyse der delfi-community. In: Desel, J., Haake, J.M., Spannagel, C. (eds.) Die 10. E-Learning Fachtagung der Gesellschaft für Informatik. Lecture Notes in Informatics (LNI), pp. 87–98. Gesellschaft für Informatik, Bonn (2012)
Vignollet, L., David, J.-P., Ferraris, C., Martel, C., Lejeune, A.: Comparing educational modeling languages on a case study. In: Kinshuk, Koper, R., Kommers, P., Kirschner, P., Sampson, D., Didderen, W. (eds.) Advanced Learning Technologies, ICALT 2006, pp. 1149–1151. IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2006)
Botturi, L., Todd Stubbs, S.: Handbook of visual languages for instructional design: Theories and practices (2008)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Harrer, A., Göhnert, T., Hoppe, H.U. (2013). How Do Researchers on Collaboration Technology Collaborate with Each Other? A Social Network Analysis. In: Antunes, P., Gerosa, M.A., Sylvester, A., Vassileva, J., de Vreede, GJ. (eds) Collaboration and Technology. CRIWG 2013. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 8224. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41347-6_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41347-6_4
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-41346-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-41347-6
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)