Abstract
Ontology matching plays a crucial role to resolve semantic heterogeneities within knowledge-based systems. However, ontologies contain a massive number of concepts, resulting in performance impediments during the ontology matching process. With the increasing number of ontology concepts, there is a growing need to focus more on large-scale matching problems. To this end, in this paper, we come up with a new partitioning-based matching approach, where a new clustering method for partitioning concepts of ontologies is introduced. The proposed method, called SeeCOnt, is a seeding-based clustering technique aiming to reduce the complexity of comparison by only using clusters’ seed. In particular, SeeCOnt first identifies and determines the seeds of clusters based on the highest ranked concepts using a distribution condition, then the remaining concepts are placed into the proper cluster by defining and utilizing a membership function. The SeeCOnt method can improve the memory consuming problem in the large-scale matching problem, as well as it increases the matching quality. The experimental evaluation shows that SeeCOnt, compared with the top ten participant systems in OAEI, demonstrates acceptable results.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Algergawy, A., Massmann, S., Rahm, E.: A clustering-based approach for large-scale ontology matching. In: Eder, J., Bielikova, M., Tjoa, A.M. (eds.) ADBIS 2011. LNCS, vol. 6909, pp. 415–428. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Algergawy, A., Nayak, R., Saake, G.: Element similarity measures in XML schema matching. Inf. Sci. 180(24), 4975–4998 (2010)
Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E.: Schema Matching and Mapping. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Do, H.H., Rahm, E.: Matching large schemas: approaches and evaluation. Inf. Syst. 32(6), 857–885 (2007)
Doan, A., Halevy, A.: Semantic integration research in the database community: A brief survey. AAAI AI Mag. 25(1), 83–94 (2005)
Doan, A., Halevy, A.Y., Ives, Z.G.: Principles of Data Integration. Morgan Kaufmann, USA (2012)
Ehrig, M., Staab, S.: QOM – quick ontology mapping. In: McIlraith, S.A., Plexousakis, D., van Harmelen, F. (eds.) ISWC 2004. LNCS, vol. 3298, pp. 683–697. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)
Euzenat, J., Shvaiko, P.: Ontology Matching, 2nd edn. Springer, Heidelberg (2013)
Freeman, L.C.: Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification. Soc. Netw. 1(3), 215–239 (1979)
Freeman, L.C.: A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry 40(1), 35–41 (1997)
Graves, A., Adali, S., Hendler, J.: A method to rank nodes in an RDF graph. In: 7th International Semantic Web Conference (Posters and Demos) (2008)
Hage, P., Harary, F.: Eccentricity and centrality in networks. Soc. Netw. 17, 57–63 (1995)
Hamdi, F., Safar, B., Reynaud, C., Zargayouna, H.: Alignment-based partitioning of large-scale ontologies. In: Guillet, F., Ritschard, G., Zighed, D.A., Briand, H. (eds.) Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Management. SCI, vol. 292, pp. 251–269. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)
Hendler, J.: Agents and the semantic web. IEEE Intell. Syst. J. 16, 30–37 (2001)
Hu, W., Qu, Y., Cheng, G.: Matching large ontologies: A divide-and-conquer approach. DKE 67, 140–160 (2008)
Kermarrec, A.-M., Merrer, E.L., Sericola, B., Trdan, G.: Second order centrality: Distributed assessment of nodes criticity in complex networks. Comput. Commun. 34, 619–628 (2011)
Koschützki, D., Lehmann, K.A., Peeters, L., Richter, S., Tenfelde-Podehl, D., Zlotowski, O.: Centrality indices. In: Brandes, U., Erlebach, T. (eds.) Network Analysis. LNCS, vol. 3418, pp. 16–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2005)
Rahm, E.: Towards large-scale schema and ontology matching. In: Bellahsene, Z., Bonifati, A., Rahm, E. (eds.) Data-Centric Systems and Applications, vol. 5258, pp. 3–27. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)
Rahm, E., Bernstein, P.A.: A survey of approaches to automatic schema matching. VLDB J. 10(4), 334–350 (2001)
Seddiquia, M.H., Aono, M.: An efficient and scalable algorithm for segmented alignment of ontologies of arbitrary size. Web Semant. 7(4), 344–356 (2009)
Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J.: Ontology matching: State of the art and future challenges. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 25(1), 158–176 (2013)
Shvaiko, P., Euzenat, J., Mao, M., Jimnez-Ruiz, E., Li, J., Ngonga, A.: editors. 9th International Workshop on Ontology Matching collocated with the 13th International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2014) (2014)
Wang, Z., Wang, Y., Zhang, S.-S., Shen, G., Du, T.: Matching large scale ontology effectively. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 99–105. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Hu, W., Zhao, Y., Qu, Y.: Partition-based block matching of large class hierarchies. In: Mizoguchi, R., Shi, Z.-Z., Giunchiglia, F. (eds.) ASWC 2006. LNCS, vol. 4185, pp. 72–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)
Zhong, Q., Li, H., Li, J., Xie, G.T., Tang, J., Zhou, L., Pan, Y.: A Gauss function based approach for unbalanced ontology matching. In: the ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, (SIGMOD 2009), pp. 669–680 (2009)
Acknowledgments
A. Algergawy’work is partly funded by DFG in the INFRA1 project of CRC AquaDiva.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2015 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this paper
Cite this paper
Algergawy, A., Babalou, S., Kargar, M.J., Davarpanah, S.H. (2015). SeeCOnt: A New Seeding-Based Clustering Approach for Ontology Matching. In: Tadeusz, M., Valduriez, P., Bellatreche, L. (eds) Advances in Databases and Information Systems. ADBIS 2015. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 9282. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23135-8_17
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-23135-8_17
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-23134-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-23135-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)