Impact of Agent Role on Confusion Induction and Learning

1. D’Mello, S., Lehman, B., Pekrun, R., Graesser, A.: Confusion can be beneficial for learning. Learning and Instruction 29, 153–170 (2014)

   Article  Google Scholar 

2. Grosse, C., Renkl, A.: Finding and fixing errors in worked examples: Can this foster learning outcomes? Learning and Instruction 17, 612–634 (2007)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Lehman, B., D’Mello, S., Strain, A., Mills, C., Gross, M., Dobbins, A., et al.: Inducting and tracking confusion with contradictions during complex learning. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 22, 71–93 (2013)

   Google Scholar 

4. McLaren, B.M., et al.: To err is human, to explain and correct is divine: A study of interactive erroneous examples with middle school math students. In: Ravenscroft, A., Lindstaedt, S., Kloos, C.D., Hernández-Leo, D. (eds.) EC-TEL 2012. LNCS, vol. 7563, pp. 222–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)

   Chapter  Google Scholar 

5. Tsovaltzi, D., Melis, E., McLaren, B.: Erroneous examples: Effects on learning fractions in a web-based setting. International Journal of Technology Enhanced Learning 4, 191–230 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

6. Braasch, J., Rouet, J.-F., Vibert, N., Britt, M.: Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition 40, 450–465 (2012)

   Article  Google Scholar 

7. Limón, M.: On the cognitive conflict as an instructional strategy for conceptual change: A critical appraisal. Learning and Instruction 11, 357–380 (2001)

   Article  Google Scholar 

8. Festinger, L.: A theory of cognitive dissonance. Row Peterson, Evanston (1957)

   Google Scholar 

9. Graesser, A., Lu, S., Olde, B., Cooper-Pye, E., Whitten, S.: Question asking and eye tracking during cognitive disequilibrium: Comprehending illustrated texts on devices when devices breakdown. Memory & Cognition 33, 1235–1247 (2005)

   Article  Google Scholar 

10. Piaget, J.: The origins of intelligence. International University Press, New York (1952)

    Google Scholar 

11. Chinn, C., Brewer, W.: An empirical test of a taxonomy of responses to anomalous data in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching 35, 623–654 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

12. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H., Britt, M.: Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly 44, 6–28 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

13. Goldman, S., Braasch, J., Wiley, J., Graesser, A., Brodowinska, K.: Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly 47, 356–381 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

14. Strømsø, H., Bråten, I., Britt, M.: Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction 20, 192–204 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Wiley, J., Goldman, S., Graesser, A., Sanchez, C., Ash, I., Hemmerich, J.: Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal 46, 1060–1106 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Baylor, A., Kim, Y.: Simulating instructional roles through pedagogical agents. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education 15, 95–115 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

17. Halpern, D., Millis, K., Graesser, A., Butler, H., Forsyth, C., Cai, Z.: Operation ARA: A computerized learning game that teaches critical thinking and scientific reasoning. Thinking Skills and Creativity 7, 93–100 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Graesser, A., D’Mello, S.: Emotions during the learning of difficult material. In: Ross, B. (ed.) The Psychology of Learning and Motivation, vol. 57, pp. 183–225. Elsevier (2012)

    Google Scholar 

19. D’Mello, S., Graesser, A.: Dynamics of affective states during complex learning. Learning and Instruction 22, 145–157 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

20. VanLehn, K., Siler, S., Murray, C., Yamauchi, T., Baggett, W.: Why do only some events cause learning during human tutoring? Cognition & Instruction 21, 209–249 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

21. Chan, C., Burtis, J., Bereiter, C.: Knowledge building as a mediator of conflict in conceptual change. Cognition and Instruction 15, 1–40 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Baylor, A., Kim, Y.: The role of gender and ethnicity in pedagogical agent perception. In: Richards, G. (ed.) Proceedings of the World Conference on E-learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education, pp. 1503–1506. AACE, Chesapeake (2003)

    Google Scholar 

23. Moreno, R., Flowerday, T.: Students’ choice of animated pedagogical agents in science learning: A test of the similarity-attraction hypothesis on gender and ethnicity. Contemporary Educational Psychology 31, 186–207 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references