Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Business Process Management for Knowledge Work: Considerations on Current Needs, Basic Concepts and Models

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Novel Methods and Technologies for Enterprise Information Systems

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation ((LNISO,volume 8))

  • 1281 Accesses

  • 6 Citations

Abstract

The portion of knowledge work is steadily increasing in today’s working environments in western societies. This needs to be respected in the supporting IT systems. Starting with the characteristics of knowledge work and the resulting needs of knowledge workers, we present and compare two current standardization efforts in area of Business Process Management (BPM) by the OMG—the Business Process Model and Notation (BPMN) and the Case Management Model and Notation (CMMN). We argue that a hybrid approach will not suffice in the future, but that there is rather a strong need for full integration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. OECD. (2013). Skills outlook 2013. First results from the survey of adult skills, November 2013 http://skills.oecd.org/skillsoutlook.html, http://www.oecd.org/edu/skills-beyond-school/4505266.pdf

  2. Davenport, T. H. Thinking for a living: How to get better performance and results from knowledge workers. Boston: Harvard Business School Publishing (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Weske, M. (2012). Business process management. Concepts, languages, architectures (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Drucker, P. (1959). The landmarks of tomorrow, a report on the new “Post-Modern” world. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Drucker, P. (1999). Management challenges for the 21 st century. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Reichert, M., & Weber, B. (2012). Enabling flexibility in process-aware information systems. Challenges, methods, technologies. Berlin: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Hammer, M. (2003). The agenda: What every business must do to dominate the decade. New York: Crown Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Autor, D. H., & Price, B. M. (2013). The changing task composition of the US labor market: An update of Autor, Levy, and Murnane (2003). MIT Mimeograph, June 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.177/93297002

  9. Savage, C. (1995). Fifth generation management: co-creating through virtual enterprising, dynamic teaming and knowledge networking. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hays A. G. (2011). Fachbereiche im Wandel, Wie Wissensarbeit die Unternehmen verändert, empirische Studie von Berlecon Research, Mannheim.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fraunhofer-Institut für Arbeitswirtschaft und Organisation IAO. (2009). Information Work 2009—Über die Potenziale von Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologien bei Büro- und Wissensarbeit. Stuttgart.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dalkir, K. (2011). Knowledge management in theory and practice (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  13. McElroy, M. (2003). The new knowledge management: complexity, learning, and sustainable innovation. Burlington, MA: KMCI Press/Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Reinhardt, W., Schmidt, B., Sloep, P., & Drachsler, H. (2011). Knowledge worker roles and actions—results of two empirical studies. Knowledge and Process Management, 18(3), 150–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. OMG BPMN 2.0 FTF. (2011). Business process model and notation (BPMN), version 2.0. Retrieved January 20, 2011, from http://www.omg.org/spec/BPMN/2.0/

  16. CMMN Submission Team. (2013). Case management model and notation (CMMN). FTF Beta 1. January 01, 2013, Retrieved February 06, 2013, from http://www.omg.org/spec/CMMN/1.0/Beta1/

  17. van der Aalst, W. M. P., Weske, M., & Grünbauer, D. (2005). Case handling: A new paradigm for business process support. In: Data and knowledge engineering (Vol. 53(2), pp. 129–162). Amsterdam: Elsevier B. V.

    Google Scholar 

  18. vom Brocke, J., & Rosemann, M. (Eds.). (2010). Handbook on business process management 1. International handbooks on information systems. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  19. de Man, H. (2009). Case management: A review of modeling approaches. BPTrends, January 2009, © 2009 Cordys. www.bpmtrends.com

  20. Batiancila, R. (2010). The next generation of knowledge worker processes will dominate enterprises. A forrester consulting thought leadership paper commissioned by IBM corporation. http://public.dhe.ibm.com/software/data/sw-library/ecm-programs/TheNextGenerationOfKnowledgeWorkerProcessesWillDominateEnterprises.pdf

  21. Schooff, P. (contr. Ed.). (2010). What is the difference between case management and BPM? Online discussion. ebiz.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singularity. (2009). Case management: Combining knowledge with process. BPTrends, July 2009, © 2009 Singularity. www.bpmtrends.com

  23. OMG. (2009). Case management process modeling (CMPM), request for proposal. http://www.omg.org/cgi-bin/doc?bmi/2009-09-23

  24. Hull, R., Damaggio, E., Fournier, F., Gupta, M., Heath, F., Hobson, S., et al. (2011). Introducing the Guard-Stage-Milestone approach for specifying business entity lifecycles. In M. Bravetti & T. Bultan (Eds.), Web services and formal methods (Vol. 6551, pp. 1–24)., LNCS Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Kumaran, S., Liu, R., & Wu, F. Y. (2008). On the duality of information-centric and activity-centric models of business processes. In Z. Bellahesène & M. Léonard (Eds.), CAiSE 2008 (Vol. 5074, pp. 32–47)., LNCS Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported partially by the State of Upper Austria and by the Austrian Science Fund (FWF) under grant no. TRP 223-N23.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dagmar Auer .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2014 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this paper

Cite this paper

Auer, D., Hinterholzer, S., Kubovy, J., Küng, J. (2014). Business Process Management for Knowledge Work: Considerations on Current Needs, Basic Concepts and Models. In: Piazolo, F., Felderer, M. (eds) Novel Methods and Technologies for Enterprise Information Systems. Lecture Notes in Information Systems and Organisation, vol 8. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07055-1_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics