Abstract
For almost two decades, there have been many developments in using intelligent technologies to support older people, with many different terms proposed to describe these technologies including assistive robots, embodied conversational agents and relational agents. Many technologies have been proposed in many different configurations and many assistance roles have been explored. Characteristics of these technologies include tangible or virtual; anthropomorphic, biomorphic, creature or object-like; level of visual realism; paralinguistic abilities; interactivity; adaptability; movement and positioning. The assistive roles proposed include providing information, advice and reminders, helping with physical tasks, monitoring, providing companionship and emotional support. This paper provides an overview of the characteristics and roles of these technologies and attempts to clarify some of the terminology used. It aims to provide a guide for researchers from the wide range of disciplines working on such technologies for supporting older people.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bartneck C, Forlizzi J (2004) A design-centred framework for social human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on robot and human interactive communication, Kurashiki, Okayama, Japan, 20–22 September 2004, pp 591–594
Bickmore TW, Caruso L, Clough-Gorr K (2005a) Acceptance and usability of a relational agent interface by urban older adults. In: Proceedings of CHI’05, Portland, OR, US, 2–7 April 2005, pp 1212–1215
Bickmore TW, Caruso L, Clough-Gorr K, Heeren T (2005b) It’s just like you talk to a friend: Relational agents for older adults. Interact Comput 17(6):711–735
Bickmore TW, Simmiman RA, Nelson K, Cheng DM, Winter M, Henault L et al (2013) A randomized controlled trial of an automated exercise coach for older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc 61(10):1676–1683
Breazeal CL (2002) Designing sociable robots. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, US
Breazeal CL (2003) Toward sociable robots. Rob Autono Syst 42:167–175
Broekens J, Heerink M, Rosendal H (2009) Assistive social robots in elderly care: a review. Gerontechnol 8(2):94–103
Cassell J, Sullivan J, Prevost S, Churchill E (eds) (2000) Embodied conversational agents. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, USA
Cereghetti D, Kleanthous S, Christophorou C, Tsiourti C, Wings C, Christodoulou E (2015) Virtual partners for seniors: Analysis of the users’ preferences and expectations on personality and appearance. In: Proceedings of european conference on ambient intelligence 2015 (AmI-15), Athens, Greece, 11–13 November 2015
Dautenhahn K (2007) Socially intelligent robots: Dimensions of human-robot interaction. Philosophical transactions of the royal society B: Biological sciences 362(1480):679–704
Dautenhahn K, Woods S, Kaouri C, Walters ML, Koay KL, Werry I (2005) What is a robot companion-friend, assistant or butler? In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RSJ International conference on intelligent robots and systems (IROS’05), Alberta, Canada, pp 1192–1197
Fasola J, Matarić MJ (2012) Using socially assistive human-robot interaction to motivate physical exercise for older adults. In: Proceedings of the IEEE, special issue on quality of life Technology, pp. 2512–2526
Feil-Seifer D, Matarić MJ (2006) Defining socially assistive robotics rehab robotics, pp 465–468
Fong T, Nourbakhsh I, Dautenhahn K (2003) A survey of socially interactive robots. Rob Auton Syst 42(3–4):143–166
Garner TA, Powell W, Carr V (2016) Virtual carers for the elderly: A case study review of ethical responsibilities. Digital Health 2:1–14
Heerink M, Krose B, Wielinga B, Evers V (2008) Enjoyment intention to use and actual use of a conversational robot by elderly people. In: Proceedings of HRI ’08, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 12–15 March 2008, pp 113–12
Heerink M, Kröse B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2010) Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The almere model. Int J Soc Robot 2:361
Huber A, Lammer L, Weiss A, Vincze M (2014) Designing adaptive roles for socially assistive robots: A new method to reduce technological determinism and role stereotypes. J Hum-Rob Interact 3(2):100–111
ISO (2012) ISO 8373:2012—Robots and robotic devices—Vocabulary. International Organization for Standardization, Geneva, Switzerland
Iwamura Y, Shiomi M, Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Hagita N (2011) Do elderly people prefer a conversational humanoid as a shopping assistant partner in supermarkets? In: Proceedings of Human Robot Interaction (HRI’11), pp 449–456
Johnson DO, Cuijpers RH, Juola JF, Torta E, Simonov M, Frisiello A et al (2014) Socially assistive robots: A comprehensive approach to extending independent living. Int J Soc Rob 6:195
Khosla R, Chu M T (2013) Embodying care in Matilda: An affective communication robot for emotional wellbeing in older people in Australian residential care facilities. ACM Trans Manag Inf Syst 4(4): Article 18
Lee KM, Jung Y, Kim J, Kim SR (2006) Are physically embodied social agents better than disembodied social agents? The effects of physical embodiment, tactile interaction, and people’s loneliness in human–robot interaction. Int J Hum Comput Stud 64(10):962–973
McColl D, Louie WG, Nejat G (2013) Brian 2.1: A socially assistive robot for the elderly and cognitively impaired. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 20(1):74–83
Mori M (2012) The uncanny valley (translated by MacDorman KF, Kageki N). IEEE Robot Autom 19(2):98–100
Moyle W, Beattie ER, Draper B, Shum D, Thalib L, Jones C (2017) A social robot called Paro and its effect on people living with dementia. Innov Aging 1:344
Pearce AJ, Adair B, Miller K, Ozanne E, Said C, Santamaria N et al. (2012) Robotics to enable older adults to remain living at home. J Aging Res 2012: Article 538169
Reeves B, Nass C (1996) The media equation: How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places. Cambridge University Press
Ring L, Barry B, Totzke K, Bickmore T (2013) Addressing loneliness and isolation in older adults. In: Proceedings of ACII’13, Geneva, Switzerland, 2–5 September 2013, pp 61–66
Sabelli AM, Kanda T, Hagita N (2011) A conversational robot in an elderly care center: an ethnographic study. In: Proceedings of Human-Robot Interaction (HRI’11), pp 37–44
Sakai Y, Nonaka Y, Yasuda K, Nakano YI (2012) Listener agent for elderly people with dementia. In: Proceedings of HRI’12, Boston, MA, US, 5–8 March 2012
Sidner C, Rich C, Shayganfar M, Behrooz M, Bickmore T, Ring L et al. (2014) Robotic and virtual companions for isolated older adults. AAAI Fall symposium: Artificial intelligence for human-robot interaction, Arlington, VA, US, 15–17 November 2014
Sorrell T, Draper H (2014) Robot carers, ethics and older people. Ethics Inf Technol 16(3):183–195
Spiekeman ME, Haazebroek P, Neerincx, M (2011) Requirements and platforms for social agents that alarm and support elderly living alone. In Mutlu et al. (eds): ICSR 2011, LNAI 7072: pp 226–235
Tapus A, Matarić MJ, Scassellati B (2007) Socially assistive robotics [Grand challenges of robotics]. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 14(1):35–42
Tsiourti C, Joly E, Wings C, Moussa MB, Wac K (2014) Virtual assistive companions for older adults: qualitative field study and design implications. In: Proceedings Pervasive Computing Technologies for Healthcare (PervasiveHealth’14), pp 57–64
Tsiourti C, Moussa MB, Quintas J, Loke B, Jochem I (2016) A virtual assistive companion for older adults: design implications for a real-world application. In: Proceedings SAI Intelligent Systems Conference, pp 1014–1033
Turkle S, Taggart W, Kidd CD, Daste O (2006) Relational artifacts with children and elders: the complexities of cybercompanionship. Connection Sci 18(4):347–361
UN (2015) World population prospects: Key findings and advance tables (2015 revision). United Nations, New York, NY, US
van Velsen L, van der Geest T, Klaassen R, Steehouder M (2007) User-centered evaluation of adaptive and adaptable systems: A literature review. The Knowl Eng Rev 23(3):261–281
Yasuda K, Aoe J-I, Fuketa M (2013) Development of an agent system for conversing with individuals with dementia. In: Proceedings of JSAI 2013, Toyama, Japan, 4–7 June 2013
Wada K, Shibata T (2007) Living with seal robots—Its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. Trans Robot 23(5):972–980
Ziemke T (2001) Are robots embodied? In: Balkenius C et al. (eds) Proceedings of the first international workshop on epigenetic robotics: Modeling cognitive development in robotic systems, Lund university cognitive studies, vol 85. Lund, Sweden
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Petrie, H., Darzentas, J.S., Carmien, S. (2018). Intelligent Support Technologies for Older People: An Analysis of Characteristics and Roles. In: Langdon, P., Lazar, J., Heylighen, A., Dong, H. (eds) Breaking Down Barriers. CWUAAT 2018. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75028-6_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-75028-6_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-75027-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-75028-6
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)