Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Integrated Risk Measurement Approach: A Case Study

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Measuring and Managing Operational Risk

Abstract

This chapter aims to provide an overview of the main components of an operational risk measurement framework developed by financial intermediaries for which operational risk is more important. This methodology integrates a historical analysis with a scenario analysis. This chapter describes the loss data collection, the assumption and the statistical tools used in the implemented approach. It also describes the methods used to integrate the Expected Lossess (EL) and the Unexpected Lossess (UL) resulting from the two different analyses.

This chapter was prepared jointly by the authors.

The original version of this chapter was revised: Belated corrections from author have been incorporated. The erratum to this chapter is available at https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69410-8_6

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostini, A., Talamo, P., & Vecchione, V. (2010). Combining operational loss data with expert opinions through advanced credibility theory. The Journal of Operational Risk, 5, 3–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreatta, C., & Mazza, D. (2013). Alternative approaches to generalized Pareto distribution shape parameter estimation through expert opinions. The Journal of Operational Risk, 8(2), 47–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bank of Italy. (2013). Circolare 285/2013. Disposizioni di vigilanza per le banche. https://www.bancaditalia.it/compiti/vigilanza/normativa/archivio-norme/circolari/c285/index.html.

  • BCBS. (2006). International convergence of capital measurement and capital standards: A revised framework. Comprehensive version, Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. http://www.bis.org/publ/bcbs128.htm.

  • Chernobai, A. S., Rachev, S. T., & Fabozzi, F. J. (2008). Operational risk: A guide to Basel II capital requirements, models, and analysis. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, M. G. (2002). Modeling, measuring and hedging operational risk. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cruz, M. G. (2004). Operational risk modelling and analysis: Theory and practice. London: Risk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Parliament and Council. (2013a). Directive 2013/36/EU on access to the activity of credit institutions and the prudential supervision of credit institutions and investment firms, amending Directive 2002/87/EC. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32013L0036&from=IT.

  • European Parliament and Council. (2013b). Regulation (EU) No. 575/2013 on prudential requirements for credit institutions and investment firms and amending Regulation (EU) No. 648/2012. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/IT/TXT/?uri=celex%3A32013R0575.

  • CEBS. (2010). CEBS guidelines on stress testing (GL32). Committee of European Banking Supervisors. https://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/16094/ST_Guidelines.pdf.

  • EBA. (2014). Guidelines on common procedures and methodologies for the supervisory review and evaluation process. European Banking Authority. https://www.eba.europa.eu/-/eba-publishes-final-guidelines-on-srep-methodologies-and-processes.

  • EBA. (2015). RTS on AMA assessment. European Banking Authority. https://www.eba.europa.eu/documents/10180/1100516/EBA-RTS-2015-02+RTS+on+AMA+assesment.pdf.

  • EBA. (2016). Guidelines on ICAAP and ILAAP information collected for SREP purposes. European Banking Authority. https://www.eba.europa.eu/-/eba-publishes-final-guidelines-on-icaap-and-ilaap-information.

  • Giudici, P., & Bilotta, A. (2004). Modelling operational losses: A Bayesian approach. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 20(5), 407–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ergashev, B. A. (2012). A theoretical framework for incorporating scenarios into operational risk modeling. Journal of Financial Services Research, 41, 45–161.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Embrechts, P., Klüppelberg, C., & Mikosch, T. (1997). Modelling extremal events. Applications of Mathematics, 33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frachot, A., Moudoulaud, O., & Roncalli, T. (2004). Loss distribution approach in practice. In The Basel handbook: A guide for financial practitioners (pp. 369–396). London: Risk Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giudici, P., & Stinco, G. (2004). Modelli avanzati sui rischi operativi: l’approccio delle reti bayesiane. Bancaria, 12, 55–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, J. L. (2001). Operational risk: Measurements and modelling. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klugman, S. A., Panjer, H. H., & Willmot, G. E. (2008). Loss models: From data to decisions. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mignola, G., & Ugoccioni, R. (2007). Statistical approach to operational risk management. Turin, Italy: Sanpaolo IMI Group.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscadelli, M. (2004). The modelling of operational risk: Experience with the analysis of the data collected by the Basel Committee. Bank of Italy, Economic Research and International Relations Area, No. 517.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevchenko, P. V. (2011). Modelling operational risk using Bayesian inference. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shevchenko, P. V., & Peters, G. W. (2013). Loss distribution approach for operational risk capital modelling under Basel II: Combining different data sources for risk estimation. arXiv preprint arXiv: 1306.1882.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellella, M. (1999). Valorizzazione del capitale economico e rischio operativo nella banca. Banche e Banchieri, No. 6.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellella, M. (2004). Le problematiche di gestione del rischio operativo. In Leone (2004), Capital Management. CEDAM.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vellella, M. (2005). La gestione dei rischi operativi nelle banche: alcuni spunti di riflessione sulle scelte organizzative. Banche e Banchieri, No. 3.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vitantonio Matarazzo .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Matarazzo, V., Vellella, M. (2018). Integrated Risk Measurement Approach: A Case Study. In: Leone, P., Porretta, P., Vellella, M. (eds) Measuring and Managing Operational Risk. Palgrave Macmillan Studies in Banking and Financial Institutions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69410-8_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69410-8_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-69409-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-69410-8

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics