Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Selection of Fighter Aircraft for Turkish Air Forces Under Uncertain Environment

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems (INFUS 2023)

Abstract

Modern warplanes are assessed by military forces according to a multitude of factors. The production of fighter aircraft for the Turkish Air Forces, National Combat Aircraft (NCA) project currently being carried out by Turkish Aerospace Industries under the auspices of the defense industry presidency. In the present conditions, purchasing a new combatant warplane is a faster solution than producing a new one.

According to the findings of the literature review, a total of 13 criteria should be taken into consideration for the selection of fighter aircraft for the Turkish Air Forces, including purchasing cost, installation and maintenance cost, the suitability of the existing weapon systems of the Turkish Armed Forces, and the political climate of relevant countries. Since some of the criteria cannot be expressed numerically due to the shortage of information, fuzzy logic can be utilized to overcome this issue. Especially, hesitant fuzzy sets can be a good candidate to express the vagueness with the assigning more than one membership. To determine the weights of the criteria, the hesitant fuzzy DEMATEL (Decision Making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory) method has been integrated z-number theory considering reliability functions of the decision-makers. Then, the classical VIKOR (VIseKriterijumska Optimizacija I Kompromisno Resenje) mothod has been used to select the alternative aircraft type deemed most suitable for the Turkish Air Force. To show reliability of the paper, the sensitivity analysis has been performed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buckley, J.J.: Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 17(3), 233–247 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-0114(85)90090-9

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Gök, A.C., Perçin, P.D.S.: Elektronik Alışveriş (E-alışveriş) Sitelerinin E-hizmet Kalitesi Açısından Değerlendirilmesinde DEMATEL-AAS-VIKOR Yaklaşımı. Anadolu Üniversitesi Sos. Bilim. Derg. 16(2), 131–144 (2016). https://doi.org/10.18037/AUSBD.389223

  3. Soner, Y., Önüt, S.: Uçak Seçm Krterlernn Değerlendrlmesnde Ahp Ve Bulanik Ahp Uygulamasi Yüksek Lsans Tez (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kiracı, K., Akan, E.: Aircraft selection by applying AHP and TOPSIS in interval type-2 fuzzy sets. J. Air Transp. Manag. 89, 101924 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAIRTRAMAN.2020.101924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang, T.C., Chang, T.H.: Application of TOPSIS in evaluating initial training aircraft under a fuzzy environment. Expert Syst. Appl. 33(4), 870–880 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ESWA.2006.07.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dožić, S., Kalić, M.: Comparison of two MCDM methodologies in aircraft type selection problem. Transp. Res. Procedia 10, 910–919 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trpro.2015.09.044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ali, Y., Muzzaffar, A.A., Muhammad, N., Salman, A.: Selection of a fighter aircraft to improve the effectiveness of air combat in the war on terror: Pakistan air force - a case in point. Int. J. Anal. Hierarchy Process 9(2), 2017–1936 (2017). https://doi.org/10.13033/IJAHP.V9I2.489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dožić, S., Lutovac, T., Kalić, M.: Fuzzy AHP approach to passenger aircraft type selection. J. Air Transp. Manag. 68, 165–175 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JAIRTRAMAN.2017.08.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kiracı, K., Bakır, M.: Havaaracı Seçim Problemlerinde Çok Kriterli Karar Verme Yöntemlerinin Kullanılması ve Bir Uygulama. JTL J. Transp. Logist. 3(1), 13–24 (2018). https://doi.org/10.26650/JTL.2018.03.01.02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Durmaz, K.İ., Stokastik çok kriterli karar vermede yeni bir yöntem: SWARA-SMAA-2 ve savunma sanayinde uçak seçimi uygulaması. December 2019. Accessed 12 Oct 2022. https://acikbilim.yok.gov.tr/handle/20.500.12812/362202

  11. Bakır, M., Akan, Ş., Özdemir, E.: Regional aircraft selection with fuzzy piprecia and fuzzy Marcos: a case study of the Turkish airline industry. Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng., 19(3 Special Issue), 423–445 (2021). https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME210505053B

  12. Lee, H.: Evaluating civil-military relationship for effective procurement decision-making: the case of two fighter jet procurements of the Republic of Korea. Def. Secur. Anal. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1080/14751798.2022.2088331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Thakkar, J.J.: Decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL). In: Multi-Criteria Decision Making Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. SSDC, vol. 336, pp. 139–159. Springer Singapore (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4745-8_9

  14. Opricovic, S., Tzeng, G.H.: Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 156(2), 445–455 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Gul, M., Celik, E, Aydin, N., Taskin Gumus, A., Guneri, A.F.: A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Appl. Soft Comput. 46, 60–89 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ASOC.2016.04.040

  16. Opricović, S.: An extension of compromise programming to the solution of dynamic multicriteria problem. Optim. Tech. 508–517 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/BFB0036431

  17. Ilhan, M., Gundogdu, F.K.: Evaluation of spaceport site selection criteria based on hesitant z-fuzzy linguistic terms: a case for Turkiye. Int. J. Inf. Technol. Dec. Mak. vol: Inpress (2022)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fatma Kutlu Gündoğdu .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Çifçi, Y., Metin, A., Arslan, T.T., Gündoğdu, F.K. (2023). Selection of Fighter Aircraft for Turkish Air Forces Under Uncertain Environment. In: Kahraman, C., Sari, I.U., Oztaysi, B., Cebi, S., Cevik Onar, S., Tolga, A.Ç. (eds) Intelligent and Fuzzy Systems. INFUS 2023. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 758. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39774-5_73

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics