Simulating Bounded Rationality in Decision-Making: An Agent-Based Choice Modelling of Vehicle Purchasing

1. Andrighetto, G., Conte, R., Turrini, P., Paolucci, M.: Emergence in the loop: simulating the two way dynamics of norm innovation. In: Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings. Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum für Informatik (2007)

   Google Scholar 

2. Balke, T., Gilbert, N.: How do agents make decisions? A survey. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 17(4), 13 (2014)

   Article  Google Scholar 

3. Bektas, A., Schumann, R.: How to optimize gower distance weights for the k-medoids clustering algorithm to obtain mobility profiles of the swiss population. In: 2019 6th Swiss Conference on Data Science (SDS). pp. 51–56. IEEE (2019)

   Google Scholar 

4. Boulouchos, K., Bach, C., Bauer, C., Bucher, D., Cerruti, D., Dehdarian, A., Filippini, M., Held, M., Hirschberg, S., Kannan, R., et al.: Pathways to a Net Zero co2 Swiss Mobility System: Sccer Mobility Whitepaper. Tech. rep, ETH Zurich (2021)

   Google Scholar 

5. Carley, K.M., Gasser, L.: Computational organization theory. Multiagent systems: a modern approach to distributed artificial intelligence pp. 299–330 (1999)

   Google Scholar 

6. Castro, J., Drews, S., Exadaktylos, F., Foramitti, J., Klein, F., Konc, T., Savin, I., van den Bergh, J.: A review of agent-based modeling of climate-energy policy. Wiley Interdisc. Rev. Clim. Change 11(4), e647 (2020)

   Google Scholar 

7. Dignum, F., Dignum, V., Jonker, C.M.: Towards agents for policy making. In: International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation. pp. 141–153. Springer, Berlin (2008)

   Google Scholar 

8. Frankish, K., Ramsey, W.M.: The Cambridge Handbook of Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge University Press (2014)

   Google Scholar 

9. Georgeff, M., Pell, B., Pollack, M., Tambe, M., Wooldridge, M.: The belief-desire-intention model of agency. In: International Workshop on Agent Theories, Architectures, and Languages. pp. 1–10. Springer, Berlin (1998)

   Google Scholar 

10. de Haan, P., Mueller, M.G., Scholz, R.W.: How much do incentives affect car purchase? Agent-based microsimulation of consumer choice of new cars-Part II: Forecasting effects of feebates based on energy-efficiency. Energy Policy 37(3), 1083–1094 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

11. Hahnel, U.J., Chatelain, G., Conte, B., Piana, V., Brosch, T.: Mental accounting mechanisms in energy decision-making and behaviour. Nat. Energy 5(12), 952–958 (2020)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

12. Jager, W., Janssen, M.: The need for and development of behaviourally realistic agents. In: International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation. pp. 36–49. Springer, Berlin (2002)

    Google Scholar 

13. Kim, S., Lee, K., Cho, J.K., Kim, C.O.: Agent-based diffusion model for an automobile market with fuzzy topsis-based product adoption process. Expert Syst. Appl. 38(6), 7270–7276 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

14. Kiss, Á., Simonovits, G.: Identifying the bandwagon effect in two-round elections. Publ. Choice 160(3), 327–344 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

15. Kremmydas, D., Athanasiadis, I.N., Rozakis, S.: A review of agent based modeling for agricultural policy evaluation. Agric. Syst. 164, 95–106 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

16. Nguyen, K., Schumann, R.: An exploratory comparison of behavioural determinants in mobility modal choices. In: Conference of the European Social Simulation Association. pp. 569–581. Springer, Berlin (2019)

    Google Scholar 

17. Nguyen, K., Schumann, R.: On developing a more comprehensive decision-making architecture for empirical social research: Agent-based simulation of mobility demands in Switzerland. In: International Workshop on Multi-Agent Systems and Agent-Based Simulation. pp. 39–54. Springer, Berlin (2019)

    Google Scholar 

18. Nickerson, R.S.: Confirmation bias: a ubiquitous phenomenon in many guises. Rev. Gen. Psychol. 2(2), 175–220 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

19. Pereira, D., Oliveira, E., Moreira, N., Sarmento, L.: Towards an architecture for emotional bdi agents. In: 2005 Portuguese Conference on Artificial Intelligence. pp. 40–46. IEEE (2005)

    Google Scholar 

20. Revue Automobile Catalogue. https://revueautomobile.ch/, [Last accessed 28 Apr 2022]

21. Rollwage, M., Fleming, S.M.: Confirmation bias is adaptive when coupled with efficient metacognition. Philos. Trans. Royal Soc. B 376(1822), 20200131 (2021)

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Russell, S., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach, 3rd edn. Prentice Hall Press, USA (2010)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

23. Simon, H.A.: Rationality as process and as product of thought. Am. Econ. Rev. 68(2), 1–16 (1978)

    Google Scholar 

24. Simon, H.A.: Making management decisions: the role of intuition and emotion. Acad. Manag. Perspect. 1(1), 57–64 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

25. Sobkowicz, P.: Opinion dynamics model based on cognitive biases of complex agents. J. Artif. Soc. Soc. Simul. 21(4) (2018)

    Google Scholar 

26. Thiriot, S., Kant, J.D.: A multi-agent cognitive framework to model human decision making under bounded rationality. In: IAREPSABE 06 (International Conference on Behavioural Economics and Economic Psychology), Paris (2006)

    Google Scholar 

27. Urban, C.: Pecs: A reference model for the simulation of multi-agent systems. In: Tools and Techniques for Social Science Simulation, pp. 83–114. Springer, Berlin (2000)

    Google Scholar 

28. Weber, S., Burger, P., Farsi, M., Martinez-Cruz, A.L., Puntiroli, M., Schubert, I., Volland, B.: Swiss Household Energy Demand Survey (SHEDS): Objectives, Design, and Implementation. Tech. rep., IRENE Working Paper (2017)

    Google Scholar 

Download references