Abstract
This chapter focuses on the prospects for the sociology of altruism in the context of the relations between the notions of altruism and morality. For this purpose, I briefly discuss three problems that, I believe, are important for the sociological comprehension of altruism—namely, those of moral worth, moral boundaries, and impartiality. Ascribing moral worth to the acts of altruism is a plausible mechanism for a normative maintenance of unconditional helping, suggesting that human morality contains certain important layers beyond those explained by the evolutionary-utilitarian factors. The idea of moral boundaries denotes the social processes that restrict altruism to the people of particular backgrounds, groups, and identities. The impartiality of altruism, on the contrary, refers to the normative perspective that recognizes the interests of everyone affected by the action, and it arguably also plays an important part in making meaning of one’s life. I suggest that elaborating on these issues would considerably advance the sociological studies of altruism.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abend, G. (2014). The moral background: An inquiry into the history of business ethics. Princeton University Press.
Bandura, A. (1999). Moral disengagement in the perpetration of inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3, 193–209.
Batson, C. D. (1991). The altruism question: Toward a social psychological answer. Routledge.
Burnstein, E., Crandall, C., & Kitayama, S. (1994). Some neo-Darwinian decision rules for altruism: Weighing cues for inclusive fitness as a function of the biological importance of the decision. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 773–789.
Bykov, A. (2017). Altruism: New perspectives of research on a classical theme in sociology of morality. Current Sociology, 65(6), 797–813.
Calder, A. J., Novak, L. F., & Fowers, B. J. (2022). Limits of the concept of altruism: Individualism, Batson’s theory of altruism, and a social realist alternative. Journal of Theoretical and Philosophical Psychology, 42(2), 78–92.
Conte, B., Hahnel, U. J. J., & Brosch, T. (2021). The dynamics of humanistic and biospheric altruism in conflicting choice environments. Personality and Individual Differences, 173, 110599.
Curry, O. S., Mullins, D. A., & Whitehouse, H. (2019). Is it good to cooperate?: Testing the theory of morality-as-cooperation in 60 societies. Current Anthropology, 60(1), 47–69.
Deviatko, I. F., & Bykov, A. (2022). Weighing the moral worth of altruistic actions: A discrepancy between moral evaluations and prescriptive judgments. Philosophical Psychology, 22(1), 95–121.
Dromi, S. M. (2020). Above the fray: The Red Cross and the making of the Humanitarian NGO Sector. University of Chicago Press.
Durkheim, E. (2010). Sociology and philosophy. Routledge.
Firat, R. B., Kwon, H. W., & Hitlin, S. (2018). A novel measure of moral boundaries: Testing perceived in-group/out-group value differences in a Midwestern sample. Socius, 4. https://doi.org/10.1177/2378023118818741
Gibbs, J. C. (2014). Moral development and reality. Oxford University Press.
Gråd, E., Erlandsson, A., & Tinghög, G. (2021). Do nudges crowd out prosocial behavior? Behavioural Public Policy, 2021, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/bpp.2021.10
Habermas, J. (1984). The theory of communicative action. Beacon Press.
Haidt, J. (2013). The righteous mind: Why good people are divided by politics and religion. Penguin Books.
Healy, K. (2004). Altruism as an organizational problem: The case of organ procurement. American Sociological Review, 69(3), 387–404.
Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Annual Review of Sociology, 39, 51–68.
Jeffries, V. (Ed.). (2014a). The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study. Palgrave Macmillan.
Jeffries, V. (2014b). Altruism, morality, and social solidarity as a field of study. In V. Jeffries (Ed.), The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study (pp. 3–20). Palgrave Macmillan.
Krebs, D. L. (2008). Morality: An evolutionary account. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 3(3), 149–172.
Krettenauer, T. (2020). Moral identity as a goal of moral action: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Moral Education, 49(3), 330–345.
Lamont, M., & Molnár, V. (2002). The study of boundaries in the social sciences. Annual Review of Sociology, 28, 167–195.
Lamont, M., Schmalzbauer, J., Waller, M., & Weber, D. (1996). Cultural and moral boundaries in the United States: Structural position, geographic location, and lifestyle explanations. Poetics, 24(1), 31–56.
Mangone, E. (2022). Altruistic relationships, responsibility, and sociology: An attempt at theoretical systematization. The American Sociologist, 53, 53–62.
McManus, R. M., Kleiman-Weiner, M., & Young, L. (2020). What we owe to family: The impact of special obligations on moral judgment. Psychological Science, 31(3), 227–242.
McManus, R. M., Mason, J. E., & Young, L. (2021). Re-examining the role of family relationships in structuring perceived helping obligations, and their impact on moral evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 96(104), 182.
Molm, L. D., Collett, J. L., & Schaefer, D. R. (2007). Building solidarity through generalized exchange: A theory of reciprocity. American Journal of Sociology, 113, 205–242.
Parsons, T. (1991). The social system. Routledge.
Pfattheicher, S., Nielsen, Y. A., & Thielmann, I. (2022). Prosocial behavior and altruism: A review of concepts and definitions. Current Opinion in Psychology, 44, 124–129.
Piliavin, J. A. (2009). Altruism and helping: The evolution of a field: The 2008 Cooley-Mead presentation. Social Psychology Quarterly, 72(3), 209–225.
Shadnam, M., Bykov, A., & Prasad, A. (2021). Opening constructive dialogues between business ethics research and the sociology of morality: Introduction to the thematic symposium. Journal of Business Ethics, 170, 201–211.
Simpson, B., Willer, R., & Harrell, A. (2017). The enforcement of moral boundaries promotes cooperation and prosocial behavior in groups. Scientific Reports, 7(42), 844.
Smith, A. (2002). The theory of moral sentiments. Cambridge University Press.
Smith, D. L. (2016). Paradoxes of dehumanization. Social Theory and Practice, 42(2), 416–443.
Sorokin, P. (1914). Prestuplenie i kara, podvig i nagrada: Sotsiologicheskij etyud ob osnovnykh formakh obschestvennogo povedeniya i morali [Crime and punishment, service and reward: A sociological inquiry into the forms of social behavior and morality]. Isdatelstvo Dolbysheva. (in Russ.).
Sorokin, P. (1967). The ways and power of love. Regnery.
Spencer, H. (1896). The principles of ethics. D Appleton and Co.
Trappmann, V., Seehaus, A., Mrozowicki, A., & Krasowska, A. (2021). The moral boundary drawing of class: Social inequality and young precarious workers in Poland and Germany. Sociology, 55(3), 451–468.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 The Author(s), under exclusive license to Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Bykov, A. (2023). Altruism, Morality, and the Morality of Altruism. In: Hitlin, S., Dromi, S.M., Luft, A. (eds) Handbook of the Sociology of Morality, Volume 2 . Handbooks of Sociology and Social Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32022-4_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-32022-4_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-32021-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-32022-4
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)