Abstract
ICT4D scholars note that broader visions of development generate serious consequences on IT-enabled development initiatives. However, much remains to deepen our current understanding about the interplay of emergent development visions and ICT4D initiatives in specific development sectors. This paper explores the vision of ‘smart rural development’ that is increasingly framing rural development goals and policies. Conceptual and empirical papers focusing on this issue, within the field of ICT4D, information systems, rural development studies and development studies, are reviewed. Findings from the review are interpreted with the lens of institutional logics perspective to develop a typology of three smart rural development visions. The typology offers alternative assumptions about rural transformation and ICT4D practices, thus opening new avenues for research and practice of ICT-enabled rural development.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Walsham, G.: ICTs for the broader development of india: an analysis of the literature. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 41, 1–20 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1681-4835.2010.tb00293.x
Avgerou, C., Bonina, C.: Ideologies implicated in IT innovation in government: a critical discourse analysis of Mexico’s international trade administration. Info. Syst. J. 30, 70–95 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12245
Bernardi, R., Constantinides, P., Nandhakumar, J.: Challenging dominant frames in policies for IS innovation in healthcare through rhetorical strategies. JAIS 18, 81–112 (2017). https://doi.org/10.17705/1jais.00451
Miscione, G.: Myth, management of the unknown. Cult. Organ. 22, 67–87 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/14759551.2015.1092971
Noir, C., Walsham, G.: The great legitimizer: ICT as myth and ceremony in the Indian healthcare sector. Inf. Technol. People 20, 313–333 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1108/09593840710839770
Rajão, R., Hayes, N.: Conceptions of control and it artefacts: an institutional account of the Amazon rainforest monitoring system. J. Inf. Technol. 24, 320–331 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2009.12
Naldi, L., Nilsson, P., Westlund, H., Wixe, S.: What is smart rural development? J. Rural. Stud. 40, 90–101 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2015.06.006
Cowie, P., Townsend, L., Salemink, K.: Smart rural futures: will rural areas be left behind in the 4th industrial revolution? J. Rural. Stud. 79, 169–176 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.042
Gerli, P., Navio, M.J., Whalley, J.: What makes a smart village smart? a review of the literature. Transforming Government: People, Process Policy 16, 292–304 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1108/TG-07-2021-0126
Cho, J.Y., Park, S.K.: Key factors for sustainable operation of smart rural communities in aging societies: Voices of Korean community leaders. Technol. Soc. 74, 102306 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102306
Amadu, F.O., McNamara, P.E., Miller, D.C.: Understanding the adoption of climate-smart agriculture: a farm-level typology with empirical evidence from southern Malawi. World Dev. 126, 104692 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2019.104692
Avgerou, C.: The Link between ICT and economic growth in the discourse of development. In: Korpela, M., Montealegre, R., Poulymenakou, A. (eds.) Organizational Information Systems in the Context of Globalization: IFIP TC8 & TC9 / WG8.2 & WG9.4 Working Conference on Information Systems Perspectives and Challenges in the Context of Globalization June 15–17, 2003, Athens, Greece, pp. 373–386. Springer, Boston (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-35695-2_23
Díaz Andrade, A., Urquhart, C.: Unveiling the modernity bias: a critical examination of the politics of ICT4D. Inf. Technol. Dev. 18, 281–292 (2012)
Faik, I., Walsham, G.: Modernisation through ICTs: towards a network ontology of technological change. Inf. Syst. J. 23, 351–370 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12001
Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W., Lounsbury, M.: The institutional logics perspective: a new approach to culture, structure and process. OUP Oxford (2012)
Lounsbury, M., Steele, C.W.J., Wang, M.S., Toubiana, M.: New directions in the study of institutional logics: from tools to phenomena. Ann. Rev. Sociol. 47, 261–280 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-111734
Thornton, P.H., Ocasio, W.: Institutional logics. The Sage handbook of organizational institutionalism. 840, 99–128 (2008)
Lounsbury, M., Wang, M.S.: Into the Clearing: Back to the future of constitutive institutional analysis. Organization Theory. 1, 2631787719891173 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/2631787719891173
Ocasio, W., Thornton, P.H., Lounsbury, M.: Advances to the institutional logics perspective. In: Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., Oliver, C., and Sahlin, K. (eds.) The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, pp. 509–531. SAGE Publishing (2017)
Ismail, S.A., Heeks, R., Nicholson, B., Aman, A.: Analyzing conflict and its management within ICT4D partnerships: an institutional logics perspective. Inf. Technol. Dev. 24, 165–187 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2017.1320962
Malik, F., Nicholson, B.: Understanding the interplay of institutional logics and management practices in impact sourcing. Inf. Syst. J. 30, 125–149 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12254
Hayes, N., Rajão, R.: Competing institutional logics and sustainable development: the case of geographic information systems in Brazil’s Amazon region. Inf. Technol. Dev. 17, 4–23 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2010.511701
Sahay, S., Sæbø, J.I., Mekonnen, S.M., Gizaw, A.A.: Interplay of Institutional Logics and Implications for Deinstitutionalization: Case Study of HMIS Implementation in Tajikistan. Information Technologies. 6 (2010)
Schatzki, T.R.: On structural change: practice organizations and institutional logics. Österreich Z Soziol. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11614-023-00537-z
Haveman, H.A., Gualtieri, G.: Institutional logics. In: Oxford Research Encyclopedia of Business and Management. Oxford University Press (2017). https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780190224851.013.137
Schatzki, T.R.: Forming alliances. In: On practice and institution: Theorizing the interface, pp. 119–137. Emerald Publishing Limited (2021)
Lounsbury, M., Crumley, E.T.: New practice creation: an institutional perspective on innovation. Organ. Stud. 28, 993–1012 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607078111
Smets, M., Morris, T., Greenwood, R.: From practice to field: a multilevel model of practice-driven institutional change. Acad. Manag. J. 55, 877–904 (2012)
Schatzki, T.R.: A primer on practices. In: Practice-Based Education, pp. 13–26. SensePublishers, Rotterdam (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6209-128-3_2
Jones, C., Boxenbaum, E., Anthony, C.: The immateriality of material practices in institutional logics. In: Institutional logics in action, Part A. Emerald Group Publishing Limited (2013)
Alvesson, M., Sandberg, J.: The problematizing review: a counterpoint to Elsbach and Van Knippenberg’s argument for integrative reviews. J. Manage. Stud. 57, 1290–1304 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12582
Boell, S.K., Cecez-Kecmanovic, D.: A hermeneutic approach for conducting literature reviews and literature searches. CAIS 34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.17705/1CAIS.03412
Jakobsen, K., Mikalsen, M., Lilleng, G.: A literature review of smart technology domains with implications for research on smart rural communities. Technol. Soc. 75, 102397 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102397
Zhang, Q., Webster, N.A., Han, S., Ayele, W.Y.: Contextualizing the rural in digital studies: a computational literature review of rural-digital relations. Technol. Soc. 75, 102373 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2023.102373
Klein, H.K., Myers, M.D.: A set of principles for conducting and evaluating interpretive field studies in information systems. MIS Q. 23, 67 (1999). https://doi.org/10.2307/249410
Saldaña, J.: The coding manual for qualitative researchers. SAGE, Los Angeles, London (2016)
Ashmore, F.H., Farrington, J.H., Skerratt, S.: Superfast broadband and rural community resilience: examining the rural need for speed. Scottish Geograph. J. 131, 265–278 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1080/14702541.2014.978808
Young, J.C.: Rural digital geographies and new landscapes of social resilience. J. Rural. Stud. 70, 66–74 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.07.001
Mukti, I.Y., Firdausy, D.R., Aldea, A., Iacob, M.E.: Architecting rural smartness: a collaborative platform design for rural digital business ecosystem. Electron. J. Inf. Syst. In Developing Countries 89, e12236 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1002/isd2.12236
Young, J.C.: The new knowledge politics of digital colonialism. Environ Plan A 51, 1424–1441 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1177/0308518X19858998
Hlaváček, P., Kopáček, M., Kopáčková, L., Hruška, V.: Barriers for and standpoints of key actors in the implementation of smart village projects as a tool for the development of rural areas. J. Rural. Stud. 103, 103098 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.103098
Cambra-Fierro, J.J., Pérez, L.: (Re)thinking smart in rural contexts: a multi-country study. Growth Chang. 53, 868–889 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/grow.12612
Townsend, L.C., Noble, C.: Variable rate precision farming and advisory services in Scotland: supporting responsible digital innovation? Sociol. Rural. 62, 212–230 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1111/soru.12373
Bosworth, G., Whalley, J., Fuzi, A., Merrell, I., Chapman, P., Russell, E.: Rural co-working: new network spaces and new opportunities for a smart countryside. J. Rural. Stud. 97, 550–559 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2023.01.003
Torabi, Z.-A., Rezvani, M.R., Hall, C.M., Allam, Z.: On the post-pandemic travel boom: how capacity building and smart tourism technologies in rural areas can help - evidence from Iran. Technol. Forecast. Soc. Chang. 193, 122633 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2023.122633
Peters, D.J., Hamideh, S., Zarecor, K.E., Ghandour, M.: Using entrepreneurial social infrastructure to understand smart shrinkage in small towns. J. Rural. Stud. 64, 39–49 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrurstud.2018.10.001
Sandberg, J., Alvesson, M.: Meanings of theory: clarifying theory through typification. J. Manage. Stud. 58, 487–516 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12587
Sandberg, J., Alvesson, M.: Ways of constructing research questions: gap-spotting or problematization? Organization 18, 23–44 (2011)
Heeks, R.: ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development. Computer 41, 26–33 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2008.192
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2024 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Thapa, P. (2024). Unveiling the Smart Vision Emerging in ICT-Enabled Rural Development. In: Chigona, W., Kabanda, S., Seymour, L.F. (eds) Implications of Information and Digital Technologies for Development. ICT4D 2024. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 708. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66982-8_26
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-66982-8_26
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-66981-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-66982-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)