Statistics

1. US Department of Health & Human Services. Additional protections for pregnant women, human fetuses and neonates involved in research. https://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/regulations-and-policy/regulations/45-cfr-46/common-rule-subpart-b/index.html. Accessed 26 Feb 2023.

2. Schober P, Vetter TR. Chi-square tests in medical research. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(5):1193. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004410.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

3. Schober P, Vetter TR. Correct baseline comparisons in a randomized trial. Anesth Analg. 2019;129(3):639. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004211.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

4. Schober P, Bossers SM, Schwarte LA. Statistical significance versus clinical importance of observed effect sizes: what do P values and confidence intervals truly represent? Anesth Analg. 2018;126(3):1068–72. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002798.

   Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

5. Andrade C. Mean difference, standardized mean difference (SMD), and their use in meta-analysis: as simple as it gets. J Clin Psychiatry. 2020;81(5):20f13681. https://doi.org/10.4088/JCP.20f13681.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

6. Cooper LA, Roter DL, Johnson RL, Ford DE, Steinwachs DM, Powe NR. Patient-centered communication, ratings of care, and concordance of patient and physician race. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(11):907–15. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-139-11-200312020-00009.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

7. Schober P, Vetter TR. Adjustments for multiple testing in medical research. Anesth Analg. 2020;130(1):99. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004545.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

8. Vetter TR, Mascha EJ. In the beginning-there is the introduction-and your study hypothesis. Anesth Analg. 2017;124(5):1709–11. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002028. Erratum in: Anesth Analg. 2017;125(1):366.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

9. Schober P, Vetter TR. Count data in medical research: Poisson regression and negative binomial regression. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(5):1378–9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005398.

   Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

10. Coxe S, West SG, Aiken LS. The analysis of count data: a gentle introduction to poisson regression and its alternatives. J Pers Assess. 2009;91(2):121–36. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223890802634175.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

11. Sharkey AM, Siddiqui N, Downey K, Ye XY, Guevara J, Carvalho JCA. Comparison of intermittent intravenous boluses of phenylephrine and norepinephrine to prevent and treat spinal-induced hypotension in cesarean deliveries: a randomized controlled trial. Anesth Analg. 2019;129:1312–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

12. Popivanov P, Irwin R, Walsh M, Leonard M, Tan T. Gastric emptying of carbohydrate drinks in term parturients before elective cesarean delivery: an observational study. Int J Obstet Anesth. 2020;41:29–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijoa.2019.07.010. Epub 2019 Aug 6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

13. Haskins SC, Kruisselbrink R, Boublik J, Wu CL, Perlas A. Gastric ultrasound for the regional anesthesiologist and pain specialist. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2018;43(7):689–98. https://doi.org/10.1097/AAP.0000000000000846.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

14. Schober P, Vetter TR. Analysis of variance in medical research. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(2):508–9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004839.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

15. Viele K, McGlothlin A, Broglio K. Interpretation of clinical trials that stopped early. In: Livingston E, Lewis R, editors. JAMA guide to statistics and methods. McGraw Hill; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

16. Sharawi N, Bansal P, Williams M, Spencer H, Mhyre JM. Comparison of chloroprocaine versus lidocaine with epinephrine, sodium bicarbonate, and fentanyl for epidural extension anesthesia in elective cesarean delivery: a randomized, triple-blind, noninferiority study. Anesth Analg. 2021;132(3):666–75. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005141.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

17. Schober P, Vetter TR. Noninferiority and equivalence trials in medical research. Anesth Analg. 2020;131(1):208–9. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000004783.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

18. Ito C, Hashimoto A, Uemura K, Oba K. Misleading reporting (spin) in noninferiority randomized clinical trials in oncology with statistically not significant results: a systematic review. JAMA Netw Open. 2021;4(12):e2135765. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35765.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

19. Loudon K, Treweek S, Sullivan F, Donnan P, Thorpe KE, Zwarenstein M. The PRECIS-2 tool: designing trials that are fit for purpose. BMJ. 2015;350:h2147. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.h2147.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

20. Vetter TR, McGwin G Jr, Pittet JF. Replicability, reproducibility, and fragility of research findings-ultimately, caveat emptor. Anesth Analg. 2016;123(1):244–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000001398.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

21. Chauhan G, Samyal P, Pathania AA. Single-dose intrathecal analgesia: a safe and effective method of labor analgesia for parturients in low resource areas. Ain-Shams J Anesthesiol. 2020;12:23. https://doi.org/10.1186/s42077-020-00075-w.

    Article  Google Scholar 

22. Cumming G, Williams J, Fidler F. Replication, and researchers’ understanding of confidence intervals and standard error bars. Underst Stat. 2004;3:299–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

23. Wasserstein RL, Lazar NA. The ASA statement on p values: context, process, and purpose. Am Stat. 2016;70(2):129–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/00031305.2016.1154108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

24. Carlin JB, Doyle LW. 2: describing and displaying data. J Paediatr Child Health. 2000;36(3):270–4. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-1754.2000.00494.x.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

25. Schier R, Guerra D, Aguilar J, Pratt GF, Hernandez M, Boddu K, Riedel B. Epidural space identification: a meta-analysis of complications after air versus liquid as the medium for loss of resistance. Anesth Analg. 2009;109(6):2012–21. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181bc113a.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

26. Murad MH, Montori VM, Ioannidis JP, Jaeschke R, Devereaux PJ, Prasad K, Neumann I, Carrasco-Labra A, Agoritsas T, Hatala R, Meade MO, Wyer P, Cook DJ, Guyatt G. How to read a systematic review and meta-analysis and apply the results to patient care: users’ guides to the medical literature. JAMA. 2014;312(2):171–9. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2014.5559.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

27. Kallogjeri D, Piccirillo JF. A simple guide to effect size measures. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2023;149(5):447–51. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoto.2023.0159.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

28. Mascha EJ, Vetter TR. Significance, errors, power, and sample size: the blocking and tackling of statistics. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(2):691–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002741. Erratum in: Anesth Analg. 2018.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

29. Viti A, Terzi A, Bertolaccini L. A practical overview on probability distributions. J Thorac Dis. 2015;7(3):E7–E10. https://doi.org/10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2015.01.37.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

30. Vetter TR, Schober P. Agreement analysis: what he said, she said versus you said. Anesth Analg. 2018;126(6):2123–8. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000002924.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

31. Frassanito L, Sonnino C, Piersanti A, Zanfini BA, Catarci S, Giuri PP, Scorzoni M, Gonnella GL, Antonelli M, Draisci G. Performance of the hypotension prediction index with noninvasive arterial pressure waveforms in awake cesarean delivery patients under spinal anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2022;134(3):633–43. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0000000000005754.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references