Abstract
ICT for Development (ICT4D) research has evolved significantly in the course of its history. Originally characterized by a technology-transfer vision, positing technology as intrinsically “good” and desirable for development, it subsequently entered a phase of problematization of the very notion of “development”, as well as the ability of ICTs to contribute to it. Against this backdrop, we highlight the need for a paradigm change that sees Critical ICT4D – a vision that constructively problematizes the core assumptions of ICT4D research – at the core of theorizing, designing and executing research on ICTs for development. With the idea of Critical ICT4D, we introduce a way of thinking that takes stock of the adverse effects of ICTs on its intended beneficiaries, at the same time developing routes to imagining and building fairer technologies in contexts of structural vulnerability.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akbari, A.: Authoritarian smart city: a research agenda. Surveill. Soc. 20(4), 441–449 (2022)
Akpan, P.I.: Basic-needs to globalization: are ICTs the missing link? Inf. Technol. Dev. 10(4), 261–274 (2003)
Brown, A.E., Grant, G.G.: Highlighting the duality of the ICT and development research agenda. Inf. Technol. Dev. 16(2), 96–111 (2010)
Chatterjee, S., Davison, R.M.: The need for compelling problematisation in research: the prevalence of the gap-spotting approach and its limitations. Inf. Syst. J. 31(2), 227–230 (2021)
Escobar, A.: Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press, New York (2011)
Galvan-Alvarez, E.: Epistemic violence and retaliation: the issue of knowledges in “Mother India” - Violencia y venganza epistemológica: La cuestión de las formas de conocimiento en Mother India. Atlantis 32(2), 11–26 (2010)
Heeks, R.: Digital inequality beyond the digital divide: conceptualizing adverse digital incorporation in the global South. Inf. Technol. Dev. 28(4), 688–704 (2022)
Heeks, R.: Future priorities for development informatics research from the post-2015 development agenda. In: Development Informatics Working Paper, p. 57 (2014)
Khene, C., Masiero, S.: From research to action: the practice of decolonizing ICT4D. Inf. Technol. Dev. 28(3), 443–450 (2022)
Lopez, J.: Data for dignity: Requirements for the implementation of data systems for social programs in Colombia. Tilburg University (2022). https://research.tilburguniversity.edu/en/publications/data-for-dignity-requirements-for-the-implementation-of-data-syst
Martin, A., Taylor, L.: Exclusion and inclusion in identification: regulation, displacement and data justice. Inf. Technol. Dev. 27(1), 50–66 (2021)
Masiero, S.: Should we still be doing ICT4D research? Electron. J. Inf. Syst. Dev. Countries 88(5), 1–15 (2022)
Mayer-Schönberger, V., Cukier, K.: Big data: A Revolution that Will Transform How We Live, Work, and Think. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, London (2013)
Muralidharan, K., Niehaus, P., Sukhtankar, S.: Balancing corruption and exclusion: Incorporating Aadhaar into PDS. Ideas for India, p. 17 (2020)
Pelizza, A.: Processing alterity, enacting Europe: migrant registration and identification as co-construction of individuals and polities. Sci. Technol. Hum. Values 45(2), 262–288 (2020)
Qureshi, S.: Are we making a better world with information and communication technology for development (ICT4D) research? Findings from the field and theory building. Inf. Technol. Dev. 21(4), 511–522 (2015)
Schoemaker, E., Martin, A., Weitzberg, K.: Digital Identity and inclusion: tracing technological transitions. Georgetown J. Int. Affairs 24(1), 36–45 (2023)
Sen, A.: Development as freedom. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2001)
Taylor, L., Broeders, D.: In the name of development: power, profit and the datafication of the global south. Geoforum 64, 229–237 (2015)
Tsibolane, P., Brown, I.: Principles for conducting critical research using postcolonial theory in ICT4D studies. In: GlobDev Workshop, International Conference of Information Systems (ICIS), Dublin, 12 December 2016 (2016)
Weitzberg, K.: Biometrics, race making, and white exceptionalism: the controversy over universal fingerprinting in Kenya. J. Afr. History 61(1), 23–43 (2020)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2023 IFIP International Federation for Information Processing
About this paper
Cite this paper
Akbari, A., Masiero, S. (2023). Critical ICT4D: The Need for a Paradigm Change. In: Jones, M.R., Mukherjee, A.S., Thapa, D., Zheng, Y. (eds) After Latour: Globalisation, Inequity and Climate Change. IFIPJWC 2023. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, vol 696. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_25
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-50154-8_25
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-031-50153-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-031-50154-8
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)