Abstract
Nowadays, a lot of scientists’ works aim to improve the quality of people’s life but it could be quite complicated without building a successful collaboration. Productive partnerships can increase research efficiency in many cases and make a huge impact on society. However, today there is no clear way to find such collaborators. In this paper, we propose a recommender system for the scientists from the Higher School of Economics university to help them find co-authors for their prospective studies.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ACM: ACM digital library https://dl.acm.org/
Chen, H.H., Gou, L., Zhang, X., Giles, C.L.: Collabseer: a search engine for collaboration discovery. In: Proceedings of the 11th Annual International ACM/IEEE Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. pp. 231–240. ACM (2011)
Huynh, T., Takasu, A., Masada, T., Hoang, K.: Collaborator recommendation for isolated researchers. In: 2014 28th International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops (WAINA), pp. 639–644. IEEE (2014)
Alinani, K., Wang, G., Alinani, A., Narejo, D.H.: Aggregating author pro-files from multiple publisher networks to build a list of potential collaborators. IEEE Access 6, 20298–20308 (2018)
Lopes, G.R., Moro, M.M., Wives, L.K., De Oliveira, J.P.M.: Collaboration recommendation on academic social networks. In: International Conference on Conceptual Modeling. pp. 190–199. Springer (2010)
Zhang, Y., Zhang, C., Liu, X.: Dynamic scholarly collaborator recommendation via competitive multi-agent reinforcement learning. In: RecSys’17 Eleventh ACM Conference on Recommender Systems, pp. 331–335. ACM (2017)
Acknowledgements
Sections 2–5 were prepared under the support by the Russian Science Foundation under grant 17-11-01294, performed at National Research University Higher School of Economics, Russia. Section 1 was prepared under support by RFBR grant 16-29-09583 ‘Development of methodology, methods and tools for identifying and countering the proliferation of malicious information campaigns in the Internet’.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
7 Appendix
7 Appendix
In this section, the distribution of parameters from the models are given.
It is interesting that here exist a hump in the region of the number 800.
As it was expected, the highest hills are seen in the regions of the integer values of the variable. Moreover, there is a plenty of observations having exactly a score of 5 , which means that the journals where there were published are not good enough nowadays.
An interesting plot could be seen below. Of course, it could be expected that there is a large number of authors that have their journals only in low-citing journals. However, there are two bars not at the ends of the graph, which is quite interesting.
It can be seen from the graph that this distribution correlates with the year distribution shown in the section of the dataset description.
This graph shows that there is only a small amount of authors that have only papers with no topic association, which is very good. Moreover, as most of the previous graphs it looks as a power-law graph.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Averchenkova, A. et al. (2020). Collaborator Recommender System. In: Bychkov, I., Kalyagin, V., Pardalos, P., Prokopyev, O. (eds) Network Algorithms, Data Mining, and Applications. NET 2018. Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics, vol 315. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37157-9_7
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-37157-9_7
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-37156-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-37157-9
eBook Packages: Mathematics and StatisticsMathematics and Statistics (R0)