Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]
Skip to main content
Springer Nature Link
Log in

Guidelines for Conducting Design Science Research in Information Systems

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
ICT Education (SACLA 2019)

Part of the book series: Communications in Computer and Information Science ((CCIS,volume 1136))

Abstract

Information Systems (IS) as a discipline is still young and is continuously involved in building its own research knowledge base. Design Science Research (DSR) in IS is a research strategy for design that has emerged in the last 16 years. Junior IS researchers are often lost when they start with a project in DSR. We identified a need for a set of guidelines with supporting reference literature that can assist such novice adopters of DSR. We identified major themes relevant to DSR and proposed a set of six guidelines for the novice researcher supported with references summaries of seminal works from the IS DSR literature. We believe that someone new to the field can use these guidelines to prepare him/herself to embark on a DSR study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. 1.

    http://desrist.org/about/.

References

  1. AIS: Information Systems Basket of Eight (2019). https://aisnet.org/general/custom.asp?page=SeniorScholarBasket

  2. Alturki, A., Gable, G.G., Bandara, W.: A design science research roadmap. In: Jain, H., Sinha, A.P., Vitharana, P. (eds.) DESRIST 2011. LNCS, vol. 6629, pp. 107–123. Springer, Heidelberg (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20633-7_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. Bader, G.E., Rossi, C.A.: Focus Groups: a Step-by-Step Guide. Bader Gr. (1999)

    Google Scholar 

  4. Baskerville, R., Baiyere, A., Gergor, S., Hevner, A., Rossi, M.: Design science research contributions: finding a balance between artifact and theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 19(5), 358–376 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J.: Explanatory design theory. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 2(5), 271–282 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baskerville, R., Pries-Heje, J., Venable, J.: Soft design science methodology. In: Proceedings of DESRIST 4th International Conference on Design Science Research in Information Systems and Technology. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bayazit, N.: Investigating design: a review of forty years of design research. Des. Issues 20(1), 16–29 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. vom Brocke, J., Buddndick, C.: Reusable conceptual models – requirements based on the design science research paradigm. In: Proceedings of DESRIST. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Carlsson, S.A.: Towards an information systems design research framework: a critical realist perspective. In: Proceedings of DESRIST, p. 21 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Cleven, A., Gubler, P., Höner, K.M.: Design alternatives for the evaluation of design science research artifacts. In: Proceedings of DESRIST. ACM (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Cross, N.: Designerly ways of knowing: design discipline versus design science. Des. Issues 17(3), 49–55 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cross, N.: Science and design methodology: a review. Res. Eng. Des. 5(2), 63–69 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Deng, Q., Ji, S.: A review of design science research in information systems: concept, process, outcome, and evaluation. Pac. Asia J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 10(1), 36 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Goes, P.B.: Design science research in top information systems journals. MIS Q. 38(1), iii–viii (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldkuhl, G.: Design research in search for a paradigm: pragmatism is the answer. In: Helfert, M., Donnellan, B. (eds.) EDSS 2011. CCIS, vol. 286, pp. 84–95. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2_8

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Gregor, S.: The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Q. 30(3), 611 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Gregor, S., Hevner, A.R.: Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Q. 37(2), 337–355 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gregor, S., Jones, D.: The anatomy of a design theory. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 8(5), 312–335 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Gregory, R.W.: Design science research and the grounded theory method: characteristics, differences, and complementary uses. In: Heinzl, A., Buxmann, P., Wendt, O., Weitzel, T. (eds.) Theory-Guided Modeling and Empiricism in Information Systems Research, pp. 111–127. Physica-Verlag, Heidelber (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Hevner, A.R.: A three cycle view of design science research. Scand. J. Inf. Syst. 19(2), 87–92 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Hevner, A.R., Chatterjee, S.: Design science research in information systems. In: Hevner, A.R., Chatterjee, S. (eds.) Design Research in Information Systems, pp. 9–22. Springer, Boston (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-5653-8_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  22. Hevner, A.R., Ram, S.M., Park, J.: Design science in information systems research. MIS Q. 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Iivari, J.: Distinguishing and contrasting two strategies for design science research. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 24(1), 107–115 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Iivari, J.: Information systems as a design science. In: Vasilecas, O., Wojtkowski, W., Zupančič, J., Caplinskas, A., Wojtkowski, W.G., Wrycza, S. (eds.) Information Systems Development, pp. 15–27. Springer, Boston (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-28809-0_2

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Kotze, P., van der Merwe, A., Gerber, A.: Design science research as research approach in doctoral studies. In: Proceedings of AMCIS (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kuechler, W., Vaishnavi, V.: A framework for theory development in design science research: multiple perspectives. J. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 13(6), 29 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Lee, A.S.: Action is an artifact. In: Kock, N. (ed.) Information Systems Action Research, pp. 43–60. Springer, Boston (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-36060-7_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Levy, M., Hirschheim, R.: Removing the positivist straight jacket from information systems design science research. In: Proceedings of ECIS, p. 13 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  29. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and Natural Science Research on Information Technology. Decis. Support Syst. 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Markus, L., Majchrzak, A., Gasser, L.: A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Q. 26(3), 179–212 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  31. van der Merwe, A., Gerber, A., Smuts, H.: Mapping a design science research cycle to the postgraduate research report. In: Liebenberg, J., Gruner, S. (eds.) SACLA 2017. CCIS, vol. 730, pp. 293–308. Springer, Cham (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69670-6_21

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  32. Nunamaker, J.F., Chen, M., Purdin, T.D.M.: Systems development in information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 7, 89–106 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Offermann, P., Blom, S., Schönherr, M., Bub, U.: Artifact types in information systems design science – a literature review. In: Winter, R., Zhao, J.L., Aier, S. (eds.) DESRIST 2010. LNCS, vol. 6105, pp. 77–92. Springer, Heidelberg (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-13335-0_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  34. Okoli, C.: A guide to conducting a standalone systematic literature review. Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst. 37, 879–910 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Tuunanen, T., Vaezi, R.: Design science research evaluation. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 398–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_29

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  36. Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M.A., Chatterjee, S.: A design science research methodology for information systems research. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 24(3), 45–77 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Purao, S.: Design research in the technology of information systems: truth or dare. Techncal report, GSU Department of CIS (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: The design theory nexus. MIS Q. 32(4), 731 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R., Venable, J.R.: Strategies for design science research evaluation. In: Proceedings of ECIS (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  40. Rossi, M., Sein, M.K.: Design research workshop: a proactive research approach. Technical report (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  41. Sein, M.K., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., Lindgren, R.: Action design research. MIS Q. 35(1), 37 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Simon, H.A.: The Sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  43. Smith, G.F., Browne, G.J.: Conceptual foundations of design problem solving. IEEE Trans. Syst. Man Cybern. 23(5), 1209–1219 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Sonnenberg, C., vom Brocke, J.: Evaluation patterns for design science research artefacts. In: Helfert, M., Donnellan, B. (eds.) EDSS 2011. CCIS, vol. 286, pp. 71–83. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33681-2_7

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  45. Takeda, H., Veerkamp, P., Tomiyama, T., Yoshikawa, H.: Modeling design processes. AI Mag. 11(4), 12 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  46. Vahidov, R.: Design researcher’s is artifact: a representational framework. In: Proceedings of DESRIST. Springer (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  47. Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, W.: Design Science Research Methods and Patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology. CRC Press, Boca Raton (2015)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  48. Vaishnavi, V., Kuechler, B., Petter, S.: Design Science Research in Information Systems (2004). http://desrist.org/design-research-in-information-systems/

  49. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: A comprehensive framework for evaluation in design science research. In: Peffers, K., Rothenberger, M., Kuechler, B. (eds.) DESRIST 2012. LNCS, vol. 7286, pp. 423–438. Springer, Heidelberg (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-29863-9_31

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  50. Venable, J., Pries-Heje, J., Baskerville, R.: FEDS: a framework for evaluation in design science research. Euro. J. Inf. Syst. 25(1), 77–89 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Vincenti, W.: What Engineers Know and How They Know It: Analytical Studies from Aeronautical History. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Walls, J.G., Widmeyer, G.R., El Sawy, O.A.: Building an information systems design theory for vigilant EIS. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 36–59 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Winter, R.: Design science research in Europe. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(5), 470–475 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Zachman, J.: About the Zachman Framework (2008). https://www.zachman.com/about-the-zachman-framework

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Informatics, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

    Alta van der Merwe, Aurona Gerber & Hanlie Smuts

  2. Centre for AI Research (CAIR), Pretoria, South Africa

    Aurona Gerber

Authors
  1. Alta van der Merwe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Aurona Gerber
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Hanlie Smuts
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alta van der Merwe .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computing, University of South Africa, Johannesburg, South Africa

    Bobby Tait

  2. School of Computing, University of South Africa, Jonannesburg, South Africa

    Jan Kroeze

  3. Department of Computer Science, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, Gauteng, South Africa

    Stefan Gruner

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Switzerland AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

van der Merwe, A., Gerber, A., Smuts, H. (2020). Guidelines for Conducting Design Science Research in Information Systems. In: Tait, B., Kroeze, J., Gruner, S. (eds) ICT Education. SACLA 2019. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1136. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35629-3_11

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35629-3_11

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-030-35628-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-030-35629-3

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation