Abstract
Over the last 10–15 years there has been a growing interest in psychological time, particularly time ‘perception.’ On the periphery of this debate have been developments in dynamical-systems analysis, relevant because in a functional sense dynamical systems are a basic level of explanation for all psychological events. One might ask—if the neural algorithm underlying dynamical-systems operation is the same, irrespective of the psychological event it supports—is there a special case to be made for time as a psychological construct? Of course, this refers to a more general question, but in the present context it concerns psychological events that may be described in terms of the operation of memory or attentional processing with a validity equal to description in terms of time perception. Perhaps there is a need for ontological clarity. In the present contribution, I elaborate on the idea that immediate experience concerns criteria related to a serial event structure as well as criteria related to our sense of the passage of time. In the laboratory we tend to ignore the ecological validity required for these two sets of criteria to be meaningful, which leads to theoretical issues with some experimental data interpretation. I conclude by acceding we require terms of reference to understand how it is we function in time: these should define something beyond the neurocognitive to be meaningful psychologically, but at the same time we require a rigor in our definitions that allow multi-level research (brain, cognition, psychological experience) to be both relatable and meaningful.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arstila, V. (2012). Why the transitivity of perceptual simultaneity should be taken seriously. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 6, 3.
Bergson, H. (1910). Time and free will: An essay on the immediate data of consciousness. London: Allen & Unwin.
Brecher, G. A. (1932). Die Entstehung und biologische Bedeutung der subjectktiven Zeiteinheit—des Momentes. Zeitschrift für Vergleichende Physiologie, 18, 204–243.
Crisp, T. M. (2003). Presentism. In The Oxford handbook of metaphysics. Oxford: Oxford Handbooks.
Elliott, M. A., & du Bois, N. (2017). Dynamical constants and time universals: A first step toward a metrical definition of ordered and abnormal cognition. Frontiers in Psychopathology, 8, 332.
Elliott, M. A., & Giersch, A. (2016). What happens in a moment. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1905.
Elliott, M. A., Shi, Z., & Sürer, F. (2007). The effects of subthreshold synchrony on the perception of simultaneity. Psychological Research, 71(6), 687–693.
Fraisse, P. (1963). The psychology of time. Oxford: Harper & Row.
Grondin, S. (2001). From physical time to the first and second moments of psychological time. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 22–44.
Husserl, E. (1917). On the phenomenology of the consciousness of internal time (1893–1917) (J. B. Brough, Trans.). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
Kelly, S. D. (2005). The puzzle of temporal experience. In A. Brook & K. Akins (Eds.), Cognition and the brain: The philosophy and neuroscience movement (pp. 208–238). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pöppel, E. (1988). Mindworks: Time and conscious experience. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Singer, W. (1999). Neuronal synchrony: A versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron, 24(1), 49–65.
Vierordt, K. (1868). Der Zeitsinn nach Versuchen. H. Laupp.
von Uexküll, J. B. (1928). Theoretische Biologie (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.
von Uexküll, J. B. (1934). Streifzüge durch die Umwelten von Tieren und Menschen Ein Bilderbuch unsichtbarer Welten (Verständliche Wissenschaft, vol. 21). Berlin and Heidelberg: Springer.
von Uexküll, J. B. (1957). A stroll through the worlds of animals and men: A picture book of invisible worlds. In C. H. Schiller (Ed.), Instinctive behavior: The development of a modern concept (pp. 5–80). New York: International Universities Press.
Wittmann, M. (2015). Wenn die Zeit stehen bleibt. Kleine Psychologie der Grenzerfahrungen. München: C.H. Beck Verlag.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Elliott, M.A. (2019). Time Opined: A Being in the Moment. In: Arstila, V., Bardon, A., Power, S.E., Vatakis, A. (eds) The Illusions of Time. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22048-8_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-22048-8_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-030-22047-1
Online ISBN: 978-3-030-22048-8
eBook Packages: Religion and PhilosophyPhilosophy and Religion (R0)