Revitalizing Thoughts on Theory, Theorizing, and Philosophizing in Information Systems

• Ågerfalk, P., & Wiberg, M. (2018). Pragmatizing the normative artifact: Design science research in Scandinavia and beyond. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 43(4), 68–77.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Aken, J. E. V. (2004). Management research based on the paradigm of the design sciences: the quest for field‐tested and grounded technological rules. Journal of Management Studies, 41(2), 219–24.

  Google Scholar 

• Alter, S. (2013). Work system theory: Overview of core concepts, extensions, and challenges for the future. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 14(2), 72–121.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Andrade, A. D., & Doolin, B. (2016). Information and communication technology and the social inclusion of refugees. MIS Quarterly, 40(2), 405–416.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Avgerou, C. (2008). Information systems in developing countries: A critical research review. Journal of Information Technology, 23(3), 133–146.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Avison, D., & Malaurent, J. (2014). Is theory king?: Questioning the theory fetish in information systems. Journal of Information Technology, 29(4), 327–336.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ayer, A. J. (1936). Language, truth, and logic. London: Gollancz. (2nd ed., 1946) OCLC 416788667, Reprinted 2001 with a new introduction. London: Penguin. ISBN 978–0–14-118604-7.

  Google Scholar 

• Ballard, E. G., Barber, R. L., Feibleman, J. K., Lee, H. N., Morrison, P. G., Reck, A. J., et al. (1958). The nature of philosophical enterprise. Dordrecht: Springer.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Barkhi, R., & Sheetz, S. D. (2001). The state of theoretical diversity. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 7(1), 6.

  Google Scholar 

• Berlin, I. (1978). Concepts and categories: Philosophical essays. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Beynon-Davies, P. (2018). What’s in a face? Making sense of tangible information systems in terms of Peircean semiotics. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3), 295–314.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bhattacherjee, A., & Premkumar, G. (2004). Understanding changes in belief and attitude towards information technology usage: A theoretical model and longitudinal test. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 229–254.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bichler, M., Frank, U., Avison, D., Malaurent, J., Fettke, P., Hovorka, D., et al. (2016). Theories in business and information systems engineering. Business Information Systems Engineering, 58(4), 291–319.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Carnap, R. (1932). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language. Erkenntnis, 2. Reprinted in Logical Positivism, Alfred Jules Ayer, ed, (New York: Free Press, 1959), pp. 60–81.

  Google Scholar 

• Cartwright, N. (1983). How the laws of physics lie. New York and St Lucia, QLD: Oxford University Press and University of Queensland Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Chappell, S. G. (2005). Plato on knowledge in the theaetetus.

  Google Scholar 

• Cheikh-Ammar, M. (2018). The IT artifact and its spirit: A nexus of human values, affordances, symbolic expressions, and IT features. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(1), 1–17.

  Google Scholar 

• Chiasson, M., Davidson, E., & Winter, J. (2018). Philosophical foundations for informing the future (S) through IS research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3), 1–13.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cohen, S. M. (2000). Aristotle’s metaphysics.

  Google Scholar 

• Collingwood, R. G. (1933). An essay on philosophical method. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Colquitt, J., & Zapata-Phelan, C. (2007). Trends in theory building and theory testing: A five-decade study of the academy of management journal. Academy of Management Journal, 50(6), 1281–1303.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cornelissen, J. P. (2006). Making sense of theory construction: Metaphor and disciplined imagination. Organization Studies, 27(11), 1579–1597.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Cornelius, B. A. (1962). Coherence theory of truth. In D. D. Runes (Ed.), Dictionary of philosophy (p. 58). Totowa, NJ: Littlefield, Adams, and Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Daly, C. (2010). An introduction to philosophical methods. Toronto: Broadview Press.

  Google Scholar 

• David, M. (2015, 28 May). The correspondence theory of truth. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/truth-correspondence/.

• Davis, F. D. (1985). A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results. Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

  Google Scholar 

• De Moor, A., & Weigand, H. (1996). The role of social constraints in the Design of Research Network Information Systems. Proceedings of Eco-Informa, 96, 4–7.

  Google Scholar 

• Dennett, D. C. (2013). Intuition pumps and other tools for thinking. New York: WW Norton & Company.

  Google Scholar 

• Dennis, A. R., & Kinney, S. T. (1998). Testing media richness theory in the new media: The effects of cues, feedback, and task equivocality. Information Systems Research, 9(3), 256–274.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Derrida J. (1993). Khôra. Paris: Galilée.

  Google Scholar 

• Dietz, J. L. (2006). What is Enterprise ontology? (pp. 7–13). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Dietz, J. L., Hoogervorst, J. A., Albani, A., Aveiro, D., Babkin, E., Barjis, J., …, Mulder, H. (2013). The discipline of enterprise engineering. International Journal of Organisational Design and Engineering, 3(1), 86–114.

  Google Scholar 

• Douglas, T. (2008). Moral enhancement. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(3), 228–245.

  Google Scholar 

• Dubin, R. (1978). Theory building. New York: Free Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Ehn, P. (1988). Work-oriented design of computer artifacts. Stockholm: Arbetslivscentrum.

  Google Scholar 

• Einstein, A. (1946). Autobiographical notes.

  Google Scholar 

• Feinberg, J. (2013). Doing philosophy. Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

  Google Scholar 

• Feyerabend, P. (1975). Against method: Outline of an anarchist theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Fischer, C., & Gregor, S. (2011). Forms of reasoning in the design science research process. In H. Jain, A. Sinha, & P. Vitharana (Eds.), Service-oriented perspectives in design science research (6th DESRIST) (pp. 17–31). Lecture Notes in Computer Science: Springer.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Frigg, R., & Hartmann, S. (2013). Models in science. In E. Zalta, U. Nodelman, C. Allen, & J. Perry (Eds.), Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Retrieved December, 2016, from https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/models- science/.

• Glymour, C. (2015). Thinking things through: An introduction to philosophical issues and achievements (2nd ed.). A Bradford Book.

  Google Scholar 

• Goldkuhl, G. (2004). Design theories in information systems—A need for multi-grounding. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 6, 59–72.

  Google Scholar 

• Gould, S. J. (1993). Eight little piggies.

  Google Scholar 

• Gregor, S. (2006). The nature of theory in information systems. MIS Quarterly, 30(3), 611–642.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gregor, S. (2009, May). Building theory in the sciences of the artificial. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on design science research in information systems and technology (p. 4). ACM.

  Google Scholar 

• Gregor, S. (2014). Theory—Still king but needing a revolution! Journal of Information Technology, 29(4), 337–340.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gregor, S. (2017). On theory. In R. Galliers & M.-K. Stein (Eds.), The Routledge companion to management information systems (pp. 57–72). Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Gregor, S., & Hevner, A. (2013). Positioning and presenting design science research for maximum impact. MIS Quarterly, 37(2), 337–355.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Gregor, S., & Jones, D. (2007). The anatomy of a design theory. Journal of the Association for Information Systems (JAIS), 8(5), 312–335.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Grover, V., Lyytinen, K., & Weber, R. (2012, December 16–19). Panel on native IS theories. Paper presented at the Special Interest Group on Philosophy and Epistemology in IS (SIGPHIL) Workshop on IS Theory: State of the Art, Orlando, FL.

  Google Scholar 

• Habermas, J. (1976). On the pragmatics of social interaction.

  Google Scholar 

• Habermas, J. (1992). On the pragmatics of communication.

  Google Scholar 

• Hacking, I. (1983). Representing and intervening: Introductory topics in the philosophy of natural science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Haj-Bolouri, A. (2018a). Designing for adaptable learning. Dissertation Thesis. University West, Sweden.

  Google Scholar 

• Haj-Bolouri, A. (2018b). Kernel Philosophy: A Way of Inspiring and Mak-ing Sense of Design in Information Systems Re-search?. In AIS SIGPRAG pre-ICIS workshop on” Practice-based Design and Innovation of Digital Artifacts”, 2018-12–12, San Francisco, CA, USA (pp. 1-19). American Information Society.

  Google Scholar 

• Haj-Bolouri, A., Chandra Kruse, L., Iivari, J., & Flensburg, P. (2016a). How Habermas’ philosophy can inspire the design of information systems: the case of designing an open learning platform for social integration. In IRIS39, Information Systems Research Seminar in Scandinavia, Ljungskile, August 7–10, 2016. (Vol. 7, pp. 1–13).

  Google Scholar 

• Haj-Bolouri, A., Kruse Chandra, L., Iivari, J., and Flensburg, P. (2016b). How Habermas’ philosophy can inspire the design of information systems: The case of designing an open learning platform for social integration. Selected Papers of the IRIS, Issue Nr 7. 2.

  Google Scholar 

• Hassan, N. R., & Lowry, P. B. (2015, December 13). Seeking middle-range theories in information systems research. Paper presented at the International Conference for Information Systems (ICIS).

  Google Scholar 

• Hassan, N. R., Mingers, J., & Stahl, B. (2018). Philosophy and information systems: Where are we and where should we go? European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3), 263–277.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Heng, M. S. H., & De Moor, A. (2003). From Habermas’s communicative theory to practice on the internet. Information Systems Journal, 13, 331–352.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hevner, A. R., March, S. T., & Park, K. (2004). Design research in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 28(1), 76–105.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (1989). Four paradigms of information systems development. Communications of the ACM, 32(10), 1199–1216.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Hirschheim, R., Klein, H. K., & Lyytinen, K. (1995). Information systems development and data modeling: Conceptual and philosophical foundations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Hovorka, D. S., & Gregor, S. (2012). 3. Untangling causality in design science theorising. Information Systems Foundations, 55.

  Google Scholar 

• Howell, K. E. (2013). An introduction to the philosophy of methodology.

  Google Scholar 

• Huxley, A. (1932). Texts and pretexts.

  Google Scholar 

• Iivari, J., Hirschheim, R., & Klein, H. K. (2000). A dynamic framework for classifying information systems development methodologies and approaches. Journal of Management Information Systems, 17(3), 179–218.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Introna, L. (2002). The question concerning information technology: Thinking with Heidegger on the essence of information technology. In Internet Management Issues (pp. 220–234). Hershey, PA: IGI Publishing.

  Chapter  Google Scholar 

• Introna, L. (2005). Phenomenological approaches to ethics and information technology. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

  Google Scholar 

• Jaccard, J., & Jacoby, J. (2009). Theory construction and model-building skills: A practical guide for social scientists. New York: Guilford Press.

  Google Scholar 

• James, W. (1909). The meaning of truth.

  Google Scholar 

• Janson, M., & Cecez-Kecmanovic, D. (2005). Making sense of E-commerce as social action. Information Technology & People, 18(4), 311–342.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Janson, M., Iivari, J., & Oinas-Kukkonen, H. (2000). eCommerce as computer-mediated social action. In AMCIS 2000 Proceedings, 68.

  Google Scholar 

• King, J. L., & Lyytinen, K. (2004). Reach and grasp. MIS Quarterly, 28(4), 539–552.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kuechler, W., & Vaishnavi, V. (2008). On theory development in design science research: Anatomy of a research project. European Journal of Information Systems, 17(5), 1–23.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kuechler, W., & Vaishnavi, V. (2012). A framework for theory development in design science research: Multiple perspectives. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 13, 6.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kuhn, T. (1962). Structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Langefors, B. (1966). Theoretical analysis of information systems. Lund: Studentlitteratur.

  Google Scholar 

• Langefors, B. (1977). Information systems theory. Information Systems, 2(4), 207–219.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Langley, A. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lee, A. S. (2004). Thinking about social theory and philosophy for information systems. In J. Mingers & L. Willcocks (Eds.), Social theory and philosophy for information systems (pp. 1–26). Chichester: Wiley.

  Google Scholar 

• Lee, A. S. (2014). Theory is king? But first, what is theory? Journal of Information Technology, 29(4), 350–352.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lim, S., Saldanha, T. J. V., Malladi, S., & Melville, N. P. (2013). Theories used in information systems research: Insights from complex network analysis. Journal of Information Technology Theory and Application, 14(2), 5–46.

  Google Scholar 

• Lindgren, R., Henfridsson, O., & Schultze, U. (2004). Design principles for competence management systems: A synthesis of an action research study. MIS Quarterly, 435–472.

  Google Scholar 

• Lyytinen, K., & Hirschheim, R. (1988). Information systems as rational discourse: An application of Habermas’ theory of communicative action. Scandinavian Journal Management, 4(1/2), 19–30.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Lyytinen, K., & King, J. L. (2006). The theoretical core and academic legitimacy: A response to professor Weber. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(11), 714–721.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Magee, B. (2001). Talking philosophy: Dialogues with fifteen leading philosophers. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• March, S., & Smith, G. (1995). Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems, 15, 251–266.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Markus, M. L., & Rowe, F. (2018). Is IT changing the world? Conceptions of causality for information systems theorizing. MIS Quarterly, 42(4), 1255–1280.

  Google Scholar 

• Markus, M., Majchrzak, L. A., & Gasser, L. (2002). A design theory for systems that support emergent knowledge processes. MIS Quarterly, 26(3), 179–212.

  Google Scholar 

• Mason, R. O. (1986). Four ethical issues of the information age. MIS Quarterly, 10(1), 5–12.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Moore, G. E. (1965). Cramming more components onto integrated circuits. Electronics, 38(8), 114–117.

  Google Scholar 

• Mullarkey, M. T., & Hevner, A. R. (2019). An elaborated action design research process model. European Journal of Information Systems, 28(1), 6–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Myers, M. D., & Venable, J. R. (2014). A set of ethical principles for design science research in information systems. Information & Management, 51(6), 801–809.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Nelson, H. G., & Stolterman, E. (2012). The design way: Intentional change in an unpredictable world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Ngwenyama, O. K. (1991). The critical social theory approach to information systems: Problems and challenges. In H.-E. Nissen, H. K. Klein, & R. A. Hirschheim (Eds.), Information systems research: Contemporary approaches and emergent traditions (pp. 267–280). Amsterdam.

  Google Scholar 

• Ngwenyama, O., & Klein, S. (2018). Phronesis, argumentation and puzzle solving in IS research: Illustrating an approach to phronetic IS research practice. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3).

  Google Scholar 

• Ngwenyama, O. K., & Lee, A. S. (1997). Communication richness in electronic mail: Critical social theory and the Contextuality of meaning. MIS Quarterly, 21, 145–167.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Niehaves, B. (2007). On epistemological pluralism in design science. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 19(2), 7.

  Google Scholar 

• Orlikowski, W. J. (1992). The duality of technology: Rethinking the concept of technology in organizations. Organization Science, 3(3), 398–427.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Pater, W. (1873). The renaissance, conclusion.

  Google Scholar 

• Peffers, K., Tuunanen, T., Rothenberger, M., & Chatterjee, S. (2008). A design science research methodology for information systems research. Journal of Management Information Systems, 24(3), 45–77.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Peirce, C. S. (1901). “Truth and Falsity and Error” (in part), pp. 716–720 in James Mark Baldwin, ed., Dictionary of philosophy and psychology, v. 2. Peirce’s section is entitled “Logical”, beginning on p. 718, column 1, and ending on p. 720 with the initials “(C.S.P.)”, see Google Books Eprint. Reprinted, Collected Papers v. 5, pp. 565–573.

  Google Scholar 

• Plato. (1961). Timaeus. In E. Hamilton & H. Cairns (Eds.), The collected dialogues of Plato (pp. 1151–1211). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Popper, K. (1980). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Unwin Hyman.

  Google Scholar 

• Putnam, H. (1995). Pragmatism: An open question. Oxford: Blackwell. ISBN 0-631-19343-X.

  Google Scholar 

• Putnam, H. (2001). Enlightenment and pragmatism (p. 48). Assen: Koninklijke Van Gorcum.

  Google Scholar 

• Quine, W. V. (1951). Main trends in recent philosophy: Two dogmas of empiricism. The philosophical review, 60, 20–43.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Quine, W. V. O. (1985). The time of my life: An autobiography. Cambridge: The MIT Press. ISBN 0–262–17003-5. Harvard Univ. Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Reichenbach, H. (1938). Experience and prediction: An analysis of the foundations and the structure of knowledge. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Rorty, R. (1982). Consequences of pragmatism. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. ISBN 978-0816610631.

  Google Scholar 

• Rowe, F. (2018). Being critical is good, but better with philosophy! From digital transformation and values to the future of IS-research. European Journal of Information Systems, 27(3), 380–393.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Ruse, M. (1995). Theory. In T. Honderich (Ed.). The Oxford Companion to Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sarker, S., & Sahay, S. (2004). Implications of space and time for distributed work: An interpretive study of US–Norwegian systems development teams. European Journal of Information Systems, 13(1), 3–20.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Schlick, M. (1931). Die Kausalität in der gegenwärtigen Physik. Die Naturwissen-schaften, 19, 145–162. Trans. “Causality in Contemporary Physics” in Schlick 1979b, pp. 176–209.

  Google Scholar 

• Sein, M., Henfridsson, O., Purao, S., Rossi, M., & Lindgren, R. (2011). Action design research. MIS Quarterly.

  Google Scholar 

• Sheldrake, R. (2012). The science delusion. Coronet Books.

  Google Scholar 

• Sjöström, J. (2010). Designing information systems: A pragmatic account. Doctoral dissertation, Uppsala universitet.

  Google Scholar 

• Smith, K., & Hitt, M. (Eds.). (2005). Great minds in management the process of theory development. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Sokolowski, R. (1998). The method of philosophy: Making distinctions. The Review of Metaphysics, 51(3), 515–532.

  Google Scholar 

• Söllner, M., Benbasat, I., Gefen, D., Leimeister, J. M., & Pavlou, P. A. (2016, October 31). Trust. In A. Bush & A. Rai (Eds.), MIS quarterly research curations. Retrieved from http://misq.org/research-curations.

• Sorell, T. (1994. Scientism: Philosophy and the infatuation with science (p. 1ff). Routledge.

  Google Scholar 

• Stolterman, E. (2008). The nature of design practice and implications for interaction design research. International Journal of Design, 2(1), 55–65.

  Google Scholar 

• Straub, D. (2012). Editorial: Does MIS have native theories. MIS Quarterly, 36(2), iii–xii.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Straub, D., Limayem, M., & Karahanna-Evaristo, E. (1995). Measuring system usage: Implications for IS theory testing. Management Science, 41(8), 1328–1342.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Suppe, F. (1999). The positivist model of scientific theories. In R. Klee (Ed.), Scientific inquiry (pp. 16–24). New York: Oxford University Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Suppe, F. (2000). Understanding scientific theories: An assessment of developments, 1969-1998. Philosophy of Science, 67(Proceedings), S102–S115.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Suppes, P. (1957). Introduction to logic. Princeton: D. Van Nostrand.

  Google Scholar 

• Tate, J. (1953). Plato’s Theory of Ideas - W. D. Ross: Plato’s Theory of Ideas. Pp. 250. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1951. Cloth, 18s. net. The Classical Review, 3(2), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0009840X0017581X

• Truex, D., Holmström, J., & Keil, M. (2006). Theorizing in information systems research: A reflexive analysis of the adaptation of theory in information systems research. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(1), 33.

  Google Scholar 

• Urquhart, C., Lehmann, H., & Myers, M. D. (2010). Putting the ‘theory’back into grounded theory: Guidelines for grounded theory studies in information systems. Information Systems Journal, 20(4), 357–381.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Vaishnavi, V., & Kuechler, W. (2007). Design science research methods and patterns. Boca Raton and New York: Auerbach Publications.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• van Frassen, B. (1989). Laws and symmetry. New York: Oxford University Press.

  Book  Google Scholar 

• Venable, J. (2006). The role of theory and theorizing in design science research. Proceedings DESRIST.

  Google Scholar 

• von Bertalanffy, L. (1950). An outline of general systems theory. British Journal of Philosophy of Science, 1, 139–164.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Walls, J. G., Widmeyer, G. R., & El Sawy, O. A. (1992). Building an information system design theory for vigilant EIS. Information Systems Research, 3(1), 36–59.

  Google Scholar 

• Weber, R. (2006). Reach and grasp in the debate over the IS core: An empty hand? Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 7(10), 703–713.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Weber, R. (2012). Evaluating and developing theories in the information systems discipline. Journal of the Association for Information systems, 13(1), 2.

  Google Scholar 

• Weick, K. E. (1989). Theory construction as disciplined imagination. Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 516–531.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Welton, D. (1999). The essential Husserl: Basic writings in transcendental phenomenology.

  Google Scholar 

• Wiener, M., Mähring, M., Remus, U., & Carol Saunders, C. (2016). Control configuration and control enactment in information systems projects: Review and expanded theoretical framework. MIS Quarterly, 40(3), 741–774.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wiesche, M., Jurisch, M. C., Yetton, P. W., & Krcmar, H. (2017). Grounded theory methodology in information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 41(3), 685–701.

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Winograd, T. (1995). Heidegger and the design of computer systems. In A. Feenberg & A. Hannay (Eds.), Technology and the politics of knowledge (pp. 108–127). Bloomington: Indiana U. Press.

  Google Scholar 

• Winther, R. (2016). The Structure of Scientific Theories. In E. Zalta, U. Nodelman, C. Allen, & J. Perry (Eds.), Stanford encyclopaedia of philosophy. Retrieved December, 2016, from https://stanford.library.sydney.edu.au/archives/fall2016/entries/structure-scientific-theories/.

Download references