Computing Sentence Embedding by Merging Syntactic Parsing Tree and Word Embedding

1. Agirre, E., et al.: Semeval-2015 task 2: Semantic textual similarity, english, spanish and pilot on interpretability. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 252–263 (2015)

   Google Scholar 

2. Agirre, E., et al.: Semeval-2014 task 10: Multilingual semantic textual similarity. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pp. 81–91 (2014)

   Google Scholar 

3. Agirre, E., Cer, D., Diab, M., Gonzalez-Agirre, A., Guo, W.: *sem 2013 shared task: Semantic textual similarity. In: Second Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics (*SEM), Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task: Semantic Textual Similarity, pp. 32–43 (2013)

   Google Scholar 

4. Agirre, E., Diab, M., Cer, D., Gonzalez-Agirre, A.: Semeval-2012 task 6: A pilot on semantic textual similarity. In: Proceedings of the First Joint Conference on Lexical and Computational Semantics-Volume 1: Proceedings of the Main Conference and the Shared Task, and Volume 2: Proceedings of the Sixth International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation, pp. 385–393. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

   Google Scholar 

5. Arora, S., Liang, Y., Ma, T.: A simple but tough-to-beat baseline for sentence embeddings (2016)

   Google Scholar 

6. Bengio, Y., Ducharme, R., Vincent, P., Jauvin, C.: A neural probabilistic language model. J. Mach. Learn. Res. 3(Feb), 1137–1155 (2003)

   Google Scholar 

7. Blacoe, W., Lapata, M.: A comparison of vector-based representations for semantic composition. In: Proceedings of the 2012 Joint Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and Computational Natural Language Learning, pp. 546–556. Association for Computational Linguistics (2012)

   Google Scholar 

8. Collobert, R., Weston, J.: A unified architecture for natural language processing. In: International Conference on Machine Learning (2008)

   Google Scholar 

9. Frege, G.: Über begriff und gegenstand (1892)

   Google Scholar 

10. Hermann, K.M.: Distributed representations for compositional semantics (2014). arXiv preprint arXiv:1411.3146

11. Lai, S.: Word and document embeddings based on neural network approaches (2016). arXiv preprint arXiv:1611.05962

12. Le, Q., Mikolov, T.: Distributed representations of sentences and documents. In: International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 1188–1196 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

13. Manning, C.D., Manning, C.D., Schütze, H.: Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. MIT press, Cambridge (1999)

    Google Scholar 

14. Marelli, M., Bentivogli, L., Baroni, M., Bernardi, R., Menini, S., Zamparelli, R.: Semeval-2014 task 1: Evaluation of compositional distributional semantic models on full sentences through semantic relatedness and textual entailment. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2014), pp. 1–8 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

15. Mikolov, T., Sutskever, I., Chen, K., Corrado, G.S., Dean, J.: Distributed representations of words and phrases and their compositionality. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 3111–3119 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

16. Mitchell, J., Lapata, M.: Vector-based models of semantic composition. In: proceedings of ACL-08: HLT, pp. 236–244 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

17. Mitchell, J., Lapata, M.: Composition in distributional models of semantics. Cogn. Sci. 34(8), 1388–1429 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

18. Pennington, J., Socher, R., Manning, C.: Glove: Global vectors for word representation. In: Proceedings of the 2014 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP), pp. 1532–1543 (2014)

    Google Scholar 

19. Socher, R., Huang, E.H., Pennin, J., Manning, C.D., Ng, A.Y.: Dynamic pooling and unfolding recursive autoencoders for paraphrase detection. In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 801–809 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

20. Socher, R., Lin, C.C., Manning, C., Ng, A.Y.: Parsing natural scenes and natural language with recursive neural networks. In: Proceedings of the 28th International Conference on Machine Learning (ICML-11), pp. 129–136 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

21. Socher, R., et al.: Recursive deep models for semantic compositionality over a sentiment treebank. In: Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 1631–1642 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

22. Song, M., Zhao, X., Liu, Y., Zhao, Z.: Text sentiment analysis based on convolutional neural network and bidirectional LSTM model. In: Zhou, Q., Miao, Q., Wang, H., Xie, W., Wang, Y., Lu, Z. (eds.) ICPCSEE 2018. CCIS, vol. 902, pp. 55–68. Springer, Singapore (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2206-8_6

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

23. Wu, W., Zhou, J., Qu, W.: A survey of syntactic parsing based on statistical learning. J. Chin. Inf. Process. 27(3), 9–19 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

24. Xiong, Z., Shen, Q., Wang, Y., Zhu, C.: Paragraph vector representation based on word to vector and CNN learning. CMC Comput. Mater. Contin 55, 213–227 (2018)

    Google Scholar 

25. Xiong, Z., Shen, Q., Xiong, Y., Wang, Y., Li, W.: New generation model of word vector representation based on CBOW or skip-gram. CMC-Comput. Mater. Continua 60(1), 259–273 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

26. Xu, W., Callison-Burch, C., Dolan, B.: Semeval-2015 task 1: Paraphrase and semantic similarity in twitter (PIT). In: Proceedings of the 9th International Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval 2015), pp. 1–11 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

27. Zhang, X., Lu, W., Li, F., Peng, X., Zhang, R.: Deep feature fusion model for sentence semantic matching. Mater. Continua Comput. 61(2), 601–616 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

Download references