Nothing Special   »   [go: up one dir, main page]

Skip to main content

Remote Sensing Image Change Detection and Location Based on Dynamic Level Set Model

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Proceedings of the International Conference on Aerospace System Science and Engineering 2019 (ICASSE 2019)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering ((LNEE,volume 622))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 865 Accesses

Abstract

Image change detection is established for extracting changed regions in multiple images of the same scene captured at different times. Recent research has demonstrated that the change detection methodologies using satellite images, such as multi-temporal visible light remote sensing image and synthetic aperture radar (SAR) image, are particularly useful for damage assessment after various disasters, e.g., earthquakes, fires, floods, and landslides. The level set method, because of its implicit handling of topological changes and low sensitivity to noise, is one of the most effective unsupervised change detection techniques for satellite images. The signed pressure force function (SPF) improved the performances of conventional level set methods through including two grayscale parameters, i.e., the average pixel intensity inside and outside the contour, respectively. However, the mean of region pixel intensity is not a good indicator in case that the images are inhomogeneities grayscale, e.g., confused-edge objects in satellite images. In order to address this problem, we propose a novel model, denoted as dynamic SPF (D-SPF) model, which can dynamically learn a discriminative indicator for distinguishing the pixels inside or outside the contour. Specifically, the principle of maximizing entropy between the regions inside and outside the contour is used to learn the K distinguish parameters, which help to guide the segmentation contour to end on the object’s edge. The experiments are conducted on a public satellite image dataset, i.e., ERS, which contain 670 SAR and 670 optical images; each image covers approximately 150 m2 area including forests, lakes, and cities, etc. These images are challenging due to the inhomogeneities of landforms and unknown natural disasters. The experimental results demonstrate that D-SPF model reduces almost 30.4% missed detection rate on the optical images and 41.2% missed detection rate on the SAR images in comparison with SPF and obtains the best detection performances in ERS dataset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Singh A (1989) Review article digital change detection techniques using remotely-sensed data. Int J Remote Sens 10(6):989–1003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bazi Y, Melgani F, Al-Sharari HD (2010) Unsupervised change detection in multispectral remotely sensed imagery with level set methods. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 48(8):3178–3187

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Celik T, Ma KK (2011) Multitemporal image change detection using undecimated discrete wavelet transform and active contours. IEEE Trans Geosci Remote Sens 49(2):706–716

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Otsu N (1975) A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica 11(285–296):23–27

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pun T (1981) Entropic thresholding, a new approach. Comput Graph Image Proc 16(3):210–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Li C, Xu C, Gui C, Fox MD (2005) Level set evolution without re-initialization: a new variational formulation. In: 2005 IEEE computer society conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition CVPR 2005, IEEE, vol 1, pp 430–436

    Google Scholar 

  7. Chan Tony F, Luminita A (2001) Active contours without edges. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 10(2):266–277

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Caselles V, Morel J, Sapiro G (1997) Geodesic active contours. Int J Comput Vision 22:61–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kass M, Witkin A, Terzopoulos D (1988) Snakes: Active contour models. Int J Comput Vision 1(4):321–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang K, Song H, Zhang L, Zhou W (2010) Active contours with selective local or global segmentation: A new formulation and level set method. J Image Vis Comput 28(4):668–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Perona P, Malik J (1990) Scale-space and edge detection using anisotropic diffusion. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 12(7):629–639

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuanxiang Li .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Liu, Y., Li, Y., Lu, Y., Liu, J. (2020). Remote Sensing Image Change Detection and Location Based on Dynamic Level Set Model. In: Jing, Z. (eds) Proceedings of the International Conference on Aerospace System Science and Engineering 2019. ICASSE 2019. Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering, vol 622. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-1773-0_22

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics