Abstract
In earlier days, it was easier to distribute the following assets as death of a person. But with the huge amount of data with the expansion of technology, there would be a great difficulty in storing that large amount of data after the person’s demise. Nowadays, people wallow too much in social networking sites, while they do not have any idea that how much data they provoke in their daily life. To safeguard and handle the data online, they need someone who can handle the accounts. A lot of problems can arise when executors attempt to access these digital assets left behind by the deceased. Many people do not have the clear idea about digital estate which they are handling. So, to prevent those unauthorized access to digital estate, one should know all the laws and the privacy rights related to the digital assets.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Peoples, C., & Hetherington, M. (2015, November). The cloud afterlife: Managing your digital legacy. In 2015 IEEE international symposium on technology and society (ISTAS) (pp. 1–7). IEEE.
Norris, J., & Taubert, M. (2016). P-221 Working with hospices to ensure patients’ digital legacy wishes are adhered to.
Waagstein, A. (2014). An exploratory study of digital legacy among death aware people. Thanatos, 3(1), 46–67.
Cerrillo-i-Martínez, A. (2018). How do we provide the digital footprint with eternal rest? Some criteria for legislation regulating digital wills. Computer Law & Security Review.
Byrd, G. (2016). Immortal bits: Managing our digital legacies. Computer, 3, 100–103.
Correa, T., Hinsley, A. W., & De Zuniga, H. G. (2010). Who interacts on the Web?: The intersection of users’ personality and social media use. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(2), 247–253.
Gulotta, R., Odom, W., Forlizzi, J., & Faste, H. (2013, April). Digital artifacts as legacy: Exploring the lifespan and value of digital data. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 1813–1822). ACM.
Sabharwal, M., et al. (2012, December) Indian Banks: Presence and interactivity level on social networking media. IFRSA Business Review, 2(4), 360–365. ISSN (Online): 2249-5444 ISSN (Print): 2249-8168 Impact factor (2012): 0.1351.
Kang, Y. S., & Lee, H. (2010). Understanding the role of an IT artefact in online service continuance: An extended perspective of user satisfaction. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(3), 353–364.
Kane, G. C., Fichman, R. G., Gallaugher, J., & Glaser, J. (2009). Community relations 2.0. Harvard Business Review, 87(11), 45–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2020 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd.
About this paper
Cite this paper
Sudan, A., Sabharwal, M., Ismail, W.K.W., Kumar, Y. (2020). Privacy Rights for Digital Assets and Digital Legacy Right for Posterity: A Survey. In: Kolhe, M., Tiwari, S., Trivedi, M., Mishra, K. (eds) Advances in Data and Information Sciences. Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems, vol 94. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0694-9_49
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-0694-9_49
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Singapore
Print ISBN: 978-981-15-0693-2
Online ISBN: 978-981-15-0694-9
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)