A Systematic Development of Uncertainty Modeling in the Assessment of Health Risk to Environmental Contaminants

• Acosta H, Wu D, Forrest BM (2010) Fuzzy experts on recreational vessels, a risk modelling approach for marine invasions. Ecol Model 221(5):850–863

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Arhonditsis GB, Qian SS, Stow CA, Lamon EC, Reckhow KH (2007) Eutrophication risk assessment using Bayesian calibration of process-based models: application to a mesotrophic lake. Ecol Model 208(2):215–229

  Google Scholar 

• Ascough JC, Maier HR, Ravalico JK, Strudley MW (2008) Future research challenges for incorporation of uncertainty in environmental and ecological decision-making. Ecol Model 219(3):383–399

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Bedford T, Cooke RM (2001) Probabilistic risk analysis: foundations and methods. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK

  Google Scholar 

• Buteau S, Valcke M (2010) Probabilistic human health risk assessment for quarterly exposure to high chloroform concentrations in drinking-water distribution network of the province of Quebec, Canada. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 73(23):1626–1644

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Butt TE, Lockley E, Oduyemi KO (2008) Risk assessment of landfill disposal sites–state of the art. Waste Manag 28(6):952–964

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Chen CF, Ma HW, Reckhow KH (2007) Assessment of water quality management with a systematic qualitative uncertainty analysis. Sci Total Environ 374(1):13–25

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Croke BFW, Ticehurst JL, Letcher RA, Norton JP, Newham LTH, Jakeman AJ (2006) Integrated assessment of water resources: Australian experiences. In: Integrated assessment of water resources and global change, pp 351–373. Springer, Netherlands

  Google Scholar 

• Dong Z, Liu Y, Duan L, Bekele D, Naidu R (2015) Uncertainties in human health risk assessment of environmental contaminants: a review and perspective. Environ Int 85:120–132

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Dubois D, Prade H, Sessa S (2001) Recent Literature. Fuzzy Sets Syst 355–363

  Google Scholar 

• Ducey MJ, Larson BC (1999) A fuzzy set approach to the problem of sustainability. For Ecol Manage 115(1):29–40

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Finley B, Paustenbach D (1994) The benefits of probabilistic exposure assessment: three case studies involving contaminated air, water, and soil. Risk Anal 14(1):53–73

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Gottschalk F, Sonderer T, Scholz RW, Nowack B (2010) Possibilities and limitations of modeling environmental exposure to engineered nanomaterials by probabilistic material flow analysis. Environ Toxicol Chem 29(5):1036–1048

  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Guyonnet D, Bourgine B, Dubois D, Fargier H, Coλme B, Chilès JP (2003) Hybrid approach for addressing uncertainty in risk assessments. J Environ Eng 129(1):68–78

  Google Scholar 

• Hromkovic JI (2005) Zámecniková. Design and analysis of randomized algorithms: introduction to design paradigms. Springer, New York

  Google Scholar 

• Janssen P, Petersen A, van der Sluijs J, et al (2003) RIVM/MNP guidance for uncertainty assessment and communication: quickscan hints & actions list. RIVM/MNP Guidance for Uncertainty Assessment and Communication Series 2. Copernicus Institute for Sustainable Development, Universitat Utrecht und RIVM-MNP, Utrecht, The Netherlands

  Google Scholar 

• Jørgensen RB, Hauser T, D’Hertefeldt T, Andersen NS, Hooftman D (2009) The variability of processes involved in transgene dispersal—case studies from Brassica and related genera. Environ Sci Pollut Res 16(4):389–395

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Kalberlah F, Schneider K, Schuhmacher-Wolz U (2003) Uncertainty in toxicological risk assessment for non-carcinogenic health effects. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 37(1):92–104

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Kentel E, Aral MM (2004) Probabilistic-fuzzy health risk modeling. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 18(5):324–338

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Khan FI, Sadiq R, Husain T (2002) GreenPro-I: a risk-based life cycle assessment and decision-making methodology for process plant design. Environ Model Softw 17(8):669–692

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Knol AB, Petersen AC, Van der Sluijs JP, Lebret E (2009) Dealing with uncertainties in environmental burden of disease assessment. Environmental Health 8(1):21

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Li H, Yen VC (1995) Fuzzy sets and fuzzy decision-making. CRC press

  Google Scholar 

• Luttik R, Mineau P, Roelofs W (2005) A review of interspecies toxicity extrapolation in birds and mammals and a proposal for long-term toxicity data. Ecotoxicology 14(8):817–832

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Masters GM, Ela W (2008) Introduction to environmental engineering and science, vol 3. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  Google Scholar 

• Maxwell RM, Kastenberg WE (1999) Stochastic environmental risk analysis: an integrated methodology for predicting cancer risk from contaminated groundwater. Stoch Env Res Risk Assess 13(1):27–47

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Mishra H, Rathod M, Karmakar S, Kumar R (2016) A framework for assessment and characterisation of municipal solid waste landfill leachate: an application to the Turbhe landfill, Navi Mumbai, India. Environ Monit Assess 188(6):357(1–26)

  Google Scholar 

• Mishra H, Karmakar S, Kumar R, Singh J (2017) A framework for assessing uncertainty associated with human health risks from MSW landfill leachate contamination. Risk Anal 37:1237–1255

  Google Scholar 

• Mofarrah A, Husain T (2011) Fuzzy based health risk assessment of heavy metals introduced into the marine environment. Water Qual Exposure Health 3(1):25–36

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Morgan MG, Henrion M, Small M (1990). Uncertainty: a guide to dealing with uncertainty in quantitative risk and policy analysis. Cambridge university press

  Google Scholar 

• National research Council (1983) Risk assessment in the federal government: managing the process. National Academies Press

  Google Scholar 

• National Research Council (1994) Science and judgment in risk assessment. National Academies Press

  Google Scholar 

• Penningroth S (2010) Essentials of toxic chemical risk: science and society. CRC Press

  Google Scholar 

• Petersen AC (2006) Simulating nature: a philosophical study of computer-simulation uncertainties and their role in climate science and policy advice. CRC Press

  Google Scholar 

• Refsgaard JC, van der Sluijs JP, Højberg AL, Vanrolleghem PA (2007) Uncertainty in the environmental modelling process–a framework and guidance. Environ Model Softw 22(11):1543–1556

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Regan HM, Colyvan M, Burgman MA (2002) A taxonomy and treatment of uncertainty for ecology and conservation biology. Ecol Appl 12(2):618–628

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Reis S, Voigt K, Oxley T (2017) Thematic issue on modelling human and ecological health risks

  Google Scholar 

• Schuhmacher M, Meneses M, Xifró A, Domingo JL (2001) The use of Monte-Carlo simulation techniques for risk assessment: study of a municipal waste incinerator. Chemosphere 43(4):787–799

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Shakhawat C, Tahir H, Neil B (2006) Fuzzy rule-based modelling for human health risk from naturally occurring radioactive materials in produced water. J Environ Radioact 89(1):1–17

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

• Singpurwalla ND, Booker JM (2004) Membership functions and probability measures of fuzzy sets. J Am Stat Assoc 99(467):867–877

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stackelberg KV, Burmaster DE (1994) A discussion on the use of probabilistic risk assessment in human health impact assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 14(5–6):385–401

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Stirling A (1999) Risk at a turning point? J Risk Res 1(2):97–109

  Article  Google Scholar 

• U.S. EPA (1989) Risk assessment guidance for superfund, volume I, human health evaluation manual (part A). EPA/540/1-89/002. Office of emergency and remedial response, Washington, DC

  Google Scholar 

• U.S. EPA (2004) An examination of EPA risk assessment principles and practices. Staff paper prepared for U.S. Environmental Protection Agency by members of the risk assessment task force office of the science advisor. EPA/100/B- 04/001

  Google Scholar 

• U.S. EPA (2005) Guidelines for carcinogen risk. U.S. EPA, Washington, DC. EPA/630/P-03/0018

  Google Scholar 

• Van der Keur P, Henriksen HJ, Refsgaard JC, Brugnach M, Pahl-Wostl C, Dewulf A, Buiteveld H (2008) Identification of major sources of uncertainty in current IWRM practice. Illustrated for the Rhine Basin. Water Resour Manage 22(11):1677–1708

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Van der Sluijs JP, Janssen PHM, Petersen AC, Kloprogge P, Risbey JS, Tuinstra W, Ravetz JR (2004) RIVM/MNP guidance for uncertainty assessment and communication: tool catalogue for uncertainty assessment. Utrecht University (Downloadable from http://www.nusap.net/sections.php

• Walker WE, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs JP, van Asselt MB, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integrated assessment 4(1):5–17

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Wang LX (1997) A Course in fuzzy systems and control. Prentice-Hall PTR, Englewood Cliffs, NJ

  Google Scholar 

• Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Change 2(2):111–127

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inform Control 8(3):338–353

  Article  Google Scholar 

• Zalk DM, Paik SY, Swuste P (2009) Evaluating the control banding nanotool: a qualitative risk assessment method for controlling nanoparticle exposures. J Nanopart Res 11(7):1685

  Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references